Climate change is upon us and it is an existential emergency.
It requires an emergency footing response that is transformative, sweeping, and immediate.
We should abolish or replace any institution or entity that chooses to stand between us and such a response.
It requires an emergency footing response that is transformative, sweeping, and immediate.
We should abolish or replace any institution or entity that chooses to stand between us and such a response.
For example: “But we can’t pass meaningful for climate reform because of the Senate” is an argument to abolish the Senate, not an argument to stop pursuing climate reform.
Realize that whatever reason one would give for not passing immediate radical sweeping climate change policy is an argument for abolishing, purging, removing or replacing that thing.
Aliens, visiting a blasted planet earth 400 million years later, find a message carved in diamond: WE COULD HAVE SAVED IT, BUT THERE WERE THESE PROCEDURAL RULES
“Destroying the planet because ...” 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
