Time for another Truman Show, Only this time Truman is wearing a Nerd Sweater.
Many of you probably witnessed the 6 MDPI editor rage quit this the weekend over this manuscript that attempted to look at adverse events of the experimental shot that shall not be named. mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/…
The knee jerk reaction from Team Panic was that MDPI was a Predatory Journal and the paper should be retracted, censored, sworn at, and ejected into space, never to return.
Then this crowd began to realize all of their Vax-Pimp hero's were on the editorial board.
Oops
Then a controlled Rage quite chain reaction ensued that seemed to be contained to only those editors donning Nerd Sweaters.
The most predictable of course was Grand Poobah Florian Krammer, known for how loaded with Gates money he is.
Next up in the Vax Tyrant Tirade was Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris.
Chair of the WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety.
Chair of this Vax Network with Gates Funding.
This one is juicy.
Connected to Fondation Merieux.
This is a charity from the Merieux family which many of you may recall, is tight buddies with the CCP and funded the building of the P4 lab in Wuhan. globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/partners/
3rd in line for lemming like leadership in the quit machine... You guessed it. Gates Money.
Katie Ewer pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33306989/
Maybe there is an independent thought in here?
Diane Harper from Michigan. You can thank her for the Gardasil nightmare.
4/4. Maybe we'll get lucky with Rage quitter #5.
Paul Licciardi- Murdochs
Nope.
And the last Nerd Sweater Rage quitter is Andrew Pekosz from John Hopkins... I mean Bill Hopkins University. I dont see obvious direct funding here but with the amount of Nerd Sweater money in JHU, I can't imagine how anyone there would spit on the ring. npr.org/sections/goats…
So this rage quitting got the Journal to issue a letter of concern which is foreshadowing a retraction. The main complaint:
Deaths after vaccination are not causal but coincidental.
OK- The authors don't make such hard claims but lets be fair and apply that to the qPCR test?
Authors provide a calm response to such criticism.
If you don't trust the Lareb-ADR data.. why are we collecting it? If Death post vax is coincidence, then death 28 days after qPCR is also coincidence and we must be honest not asymmetric.
It didn't take long for Science magazine to pile on. Out comes this one sided smear campaign on the paper.
It's basically a "STAY IN YOUR LANE!" fallacy smear.
You are not allowed to do Numerator/Denominator math without a license.. or a Nerd Sweater. sciencemag.org/news/2021/07/s…
Not a simple journalistic check. Don't even go an inch deep on the corporate conflicts that exist in this Journal. Clueless to the hundreds of Millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in BioNtech and CureVac. fool.com/investing/2020…
Maybe this is because these journals are a mirage of a distributed consensus. AAAS also has money from Nerd Sweaters.This deal expired
We need to decentralize peer review and make it Peer to Peer. Dis-intermediate the 3rd parties which invite conflicts. aaas.org/news/aaas-alli…
There is a way to do this with Bitcoin.
Peer to Peer currency. Immutable ledgers. No need for a Journal. Ultimate transparency. No advertisement/Nerd Sweater in the picture.
But what do I know? I don't have a sweater.
Does the author of the science article look like a neutral party on this?
Notice how they framed this retraction.
Didn’t give the authors anytime to respond despite the authors assuring them they had a response in preparation.
Violation of COPE ethics.
As health agencies assure the public that the DNA contamination is of no consequence, behind the scenes they are scurrying to have it removed from future vaccines!
No prior vaccine in Canada has been approved with such a sequence contaminant.
@FLSurgeonGen
Pfizer assured them the sequence is not material to plasmid manufacturing.
This is an overt lie.
You cannot make plasmids without the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene.
It is active in mammalian cells.
If it’s not needed, why is it in there?
Regulators are asking for their PCR protocol.
That means they have performed ZERO checks on this DNA contamination themselves and are entirely relying on the word of the manufacturer.
They look at the Fluorometry data as well ask why 2 diff methods?
First order of business.
How do these authors make money?
Oh… by treating cannabis use disorder!
You need to associate cannabis with harms in order for society to believe they should pay for treatment.
The authors declare no conflict despite how blatant and overt this is.
It’s ironic that the authors are from an institution notorious for using violence against its patients.
Life threatening and traumatic restraints have killed patients under their care.
So now that we understand what these physicians are pimping let’s walk through their scam.
While a helpful high school version of biology,
Her statement about the 100% unidirectional nature of DNA was put to bed decades ago when we sequenced the human genome and found 8% of it coded for HERVs.
Most cell biologists also understand that when cells divide the nuclear envelope dissolves allowing cytosolic RNA and DNA to enter the nucleus.
In true form, the journalist never links to the paper.
Did you not realize that?
If you go digging for it, you’ll see it’s a non peer reviewed study designed to never find a 1:5000 event like myocarditis.
But one person died 4 days after vax and they chalked it up as coincidence.