Uh, say what? I'll spell it out if I have to. But I really hope I don't have to.
It's about the % increase. NYC is worse than every city but Baltimore. I might try and spell it out. It's exactly what twitter isn't good for.
This statement, in the tweet: "NYC has fought back gun violence better than other major cities." It's exactly what the chart doesn't show. They just showed a chart to make it look official. That's the crazy thing. He could have just lied without showing contradictory data.
I also suspect the numbers--the data--are probably wrong. Because why wouldn't they be with this acumen level of data analysis. But should I waste my own time to figure it out? I'm not going to.
Other things that set off my BS alarm bells (and I could be ring. They're just alarms after all. Might be a false alarm): 1) 3 digits with a useless decimal place; give the pretension of ultra super preciseness.
2) Year-to-date shooting data? It *can* be done, but I don't have it. Boston? Baltimore? Philadelphia? I guess maybe from open data, but I'm not certain you can get it. Maybe it's all open city data and the data is accurate. IDK. Murder data? Yes. Shooting data is tough.
Let me spot check Chicago and NYC, because @w_h_thompson keeps track of Chicago. And NYC Compstat give the stats for NYC.
The data he provides, which shows a 65% increase in shootings in NYC... it isn't even accurate. And the error, strangely, is in his favor. 2020=7.2 & 2021=9.8. It's a 36% increase.
I can't even both with this. For what it's worth, I get a 2021 rate in Chicago of 72, which is far off from his chart. I have no idea where their data is from. Nor do I care.
Anyway, leaving aside data accuracy(!), using his data looking at (probably false) year-to-year change, this is what you get. And NYC doesn't come out looking good. But it's all BS. (and it's not the default colors of excel that are bad @Crimealytics it's everything else!)
Does NYC have a lower rate of gun violence than other cities? Yes. but if you put out a chart showing year-to-date 2021 vs 2020, then that's your point. Otherwise you could just use rate. And yes, NYC has fewer shootings than Baltimore. Or compared to 1990. But recently? No.
*72 is for the half year. So it would be an annual rate of 144, which still didn't jibe.
I think all that data presented is wrong. Period. At least for NYC and Baltimore. I'm guessing none of it is accurate.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Moskos

Peter Moskos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeterMoskos

29 Jun
Ranked choice voting? Here's my guide.
1) Use all your choices! Doesn't matter how much you hate a candidate as long, as there's somebody you hate more.
2) There is one game to play. If you don't vote for a front-runner 1-4, still put the one you would prefer as #5.
What these preliminary results mean ,with 219,944 "inactive ballots" is that 23% of voters didn't put Adams OR Garcia in ANY rank. That's a shame if you care, since it seems to come down to those two. 16% didn't vote for the top 3?! You had 5 ranks. Don't leave blanks! ImageImage
If you only put down two votes out of five because, perhaps, "those are the only two I like," and those two don't make it to the final round, your vote becomes "inactive. It literally does not count.
Read 4 tweets
29 Jun
Fill out all the ranks when you vote! Even if you don't like your 5th choice. People who didn't fill out all five because they didn't "like" a candidate will lose their (unless they voted the 2 finalists). I suspect most Wiley voters would go for Garcia over Adams.
If you don't like Adams but voted for Paperboy Love Prince instead of Garcia as your 5th choice (presuming you didn't put Adams one through four), it's on you!
(Also, the stat nerd me loves this single elimination runoff system!) web.enrboenyc.us/rcv/index.html
How were _three_ candidates eliminated between Rounds 8 and 9? I thought he or she with least votes was eliminated?
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
"Flooding the zone" is as stupid as depolicing. Policing is about what police officers do, not how many are standing around watching the chaos, ordered not to police. And Times Square should be no more important than the neighborhoods where people get shot far more routinely.
You know what I think the problem is? Some people thinks shootings just happen, in the passive voice. Cops actually know who the shooters are. By name. The problem is not with 100% accuracy. But shooters aren't hiding inside until they come out to shoot somebody all ninja Ike.
How do cops know who the shooters are? Because the guy has literally shot somebody before. The shooter is there hanging out all the time. Policing is just a job, so the cop is there only 40 hours a week. But they know each other. It's not rocket science.
Read 5 tweets
28 May
NPR's ideological cognitive dissonance on full display. Their facts support the "myth." Also, if A) Asian American aren't high earners, then B) Asian Americans are average earners or C) low earners. Which one is it? "Some are poor" is A) no duh, and B) doesn't disprove anything. Image
There's something a bit comical about some young "data analyst" at NPR "discovering" that America's arbitrary racial categorizations hide significant diversity and ethnic categories _in_ racial groups. Wow! Who could have guessed that everything isn't always about race?
"Myth: Asian Americans face less systemic racism and discrimination"

I don't think people argue this point much at all. Those inclined to do so argue that Asians face plenty of racism and succeed quite well (on average) despite it. Image
Read 8 tweets
18 May
If only we could have seen this coming.
A crazy idea, but hear me out: what if better and even more policing really _does_ improve quality-of-life, prevent violence, and save lives? Big, if true.
Imagine if there were some disease and I was like, "More doctors would be good."
And you were like, "But we know doctors don't prevent illness!"
To which I said, "Uh, sure. But doctors still improve health."
You: "I saw this video about a doctor somewhere that killed someone!"
Read 5 tweets
17 May
Good God and I hope people don't vote somebody who bribed a (corrupt) city worker and then lied about it during an investigation.
The thing about not paying bribes is it's really easy to not pay bribes. You just don't pay bribes.
And it might be worth pointing out there is a difference between a bribe and extortion. Both are bad. You might in theory pay if you're being extorted. But nobody is forced to pay a bribe. (And that includes Americans traveling abroad as well as local residents.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(