By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court refuses to hear Arlene's Flowers, which involves a florist who refused to serve same-sex couples. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Gorsuch joins Thomas in suggesting that the Supreme Court consider overturning New York Times v. Sullivan, which provides strong First Amendment protections against defamation lawsuits brought by public figures. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Gorsuch says that "modern developments" have undermined New York Times v. Sullivan, condemning the decision as "a subsidy for published falsehoods on a scale no one could have foreseen." supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Here's Thomas' separate opinion also arguing that the Supreme Court should overturn New York Times v. Sullivan and radically weaken First Amendment limitations on defamation suits brought by public figures. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
The Supreme Court takes up Carson v. Makin, a sequel to Espinoza v. Montana, which asks whether the Constitution forces states to spend public money on explicitly religious education. (SCOTUS will say yes.) scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
The Supreme Court takes up American Hospital Association v. Becerra, giving itself the opportunity to weaken or overturn Chevron deference toward administrative agencies. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
The Supreme Court will decide whether the Affordable Care Act's civil rights provisions allow disparate impact lawsuits for disability discrimination. (It will say no.) scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
Just want to point out that Thomas' call to overturn New York Times v. Sullivan favorably cites to Judge Silberman's overtly partisan rant against the media: slate.com/news-and-polit…
On the other hand, Thomas once again calls on the Supreme Court to reconsider its (terrible) qualified immunity jurisprudence, at least outside the context of law enforcement. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
By a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to Kelo v. New London, which gave the government a lot of leeway to take private property for "public use" (as the government defines it). Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
By a 6–3 vote, SCOTUS reverses an 11th Circuit decision granting habeas relief to Matthew Reeves for ineffective assistance of counsel.
Sotomayor: "The lengths to which this Court goes to ensure that Reeves remains on death row are extraordinary." supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
I didn't mention the Amish case earlier but basically: Minnesota tried to force Amish people to install a modern septic system, which violates their beliefs. The lower court sided against the Amish. SCOTUS vacates that decision in light of Fulton. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Gorsuch wants us to know that he cares deeply about the religious liberty rights of Amish people, and he's glad that the Supreme Court has given them another chance to win their case against Minnesota's septic system tyrants. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
If you're wondering why SCOTUS did not take up Arlene's Flowers and grant businesses a sweeping First Amendment right to discriminate against LGBTQ people, I think this is a good theory. ADF's lawyers are really terrible. Becket's are excellent.
I'm always surprised when I see folks I respect, and consider to be genuinely decent humans, praise ADF ... like, what are you saying about people like me behind closed doors? I probably don't want to know. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Anyway, the Supreme Court has already packed its next term with blockbusters, including cases that:
•challenge Roe v. Wade
•demand a constitutional right to concealed carry
•demand public funding of religious education
There will be more! Best start preparing for June 2022.
How do we feel about Clarence Thomas trolling us by citing Pizzagate as a reason to overturn New York Times v. Sullivan? supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Supreme Court's FIRST opinion of the day is in Brnovich, the Voting Rights Act case. It's a 6–3 decision with Alito writing the majority. All three liberals dissent. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The Supreme Court holds that neither of Arizona's challenged voting restrictions violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The Supreme Court weakens, *but does not eradicate,* the Voting Rights Act's "results test"—which gauges the impact of voting restrictions on minorities—in cases (like this one) that involve "vote denial" rather than "vote dilution." supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
As @ClaraJeffery has pointed out, RCV is ***not*** the reason for the delayed results in New York. RCV does not delay results. The wait is due to other factors, particularly a grace period for late-arriving ballots. Lowry's criticism is extreme bad faith. fairvote.org/ranked_choice_…
Also, to claim that ranked choice voting somehow delays election results is to reveal that you have no fucking idea how ranked choice voting actually works. What absolute inanity. If he has the capacity for shame, which I doubt, Rich Lowry should be ashamed of himself.
What do conservatives think they have to gain by lying about ranked choice voting, anyway? It doesn't have a partisan valence. Or is this just another phase of their ongoing campaign to undermine confidence in the integrity of any election a Republican doesn't win?
The Supreme Court's FIRST decision of the day is in Minerva Surgical v. Hologic. It's a 5–4 decision, with Kagan writing the opinion for the court upholding and "clarifying" assignor estoppel.
While both Alito and Barrett dissented, they did so on very different grounds, and argued with each other over (among other things) what Scalia would've done in this case. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The Supreme Court takes up two new cases involving free speech and immigration and issues two per curiam decisions. Full order list here: supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
SCOTUS' new cases are Austin v. Reagan National Advertising (another First Amendment case about sign regulations!) and Patel v. Garland (limited to question 1 below), which sounds like a @ReichlinMelnick case. The court will hear these cases next term. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Here's the big news: In what appears to be a 6–3 vote, the Supreme Court *reverses* an 8th Circuit decision that found officers used no excessive force when they killed someone using brutal tactics reminiscent of George Floyd's murder. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
The Supreme Court's FIRST opinion of the day is in TransUnion. It's another 5–4 decision with Thomas joining the liberals in dissent—the second of the week!
In an opinion by Kavanaugh, the court finds that most members of the class suing TransUnion for Fair Credit Reporting Act violations do not have standing.
These decisions don't make the headlines, but they illustrate the far-reaching impact of a 6–3 conservative majority. Thomas has twice peeled off from the conservative bloc to join the liberals, but it doesn't matter because, well, Amy Coney Barrett. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The Supreme Court's FIRST opinion of the day is Lange v. California. In an opinion by Kagan, the court holds that pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not categorically justify a warrantless entry into the home.
Yikes, though: KAVANAUGH joins the portion of Thomas' concurrence sharply criticizing the exclusionary rule and asserting that it never applies to evidence illegally obtained in "cases of fleeing suspects." supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The vote breakdown in Lange is pretty interesting, but both Kagan and Kavanaugh question whether Roberts' Fourth Amendment analysis is actually different, in practice, from the majority's. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…