Pelosi has jammed Kevin McCarthy into a corner on the 1/6 committee. Picking Republicans who supported the Big Lie will show how deeply implicated the party is in the crime. Yet he can't pick Rs who will treat the proceedings seriously, either. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Kevin McCarthy may pick Elise Stefanik and Jim Jordan for the 1/6 committee, according to Punchbowl News.

They are both major proponents of the Big Lie.

Indeed, virtually every GOPer floated by Punchbowl voted against Biden's electors:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
.@rickperlstein says we're seeing an "insurgency against democracy with parliamentary and paramilitary wings."

There's really a spectrum here, and congressional Republicans can be found all along it.

The 1/6 committee will inevitably illuminate this:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein A highly suggestive quote from @RepRaskin, to me:

“If we are willing to identify the role of the president of the US in these events, surely we have to be willing to look at the role all other relevant actors played. We want nothing but the facts.”

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThePlumLineGS

30 Jun
Trump is now raging at Wisconsin Republicans for not doing *enough* to find fictional fraud and overturn his loss. This again shows that his movement will never be pacified by audits and investigations. Only a future steal attempt will suffice. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
A naive pundit reading holds that if Republicans pass "election integrity" measures, it'll be easier for them to rebuff demands to subvert future results that Trumpists say are fraudulent.

Trump's raging lunacy in Wisconsin should crush those fantasies:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
These audits aren't good faith efforts to empirically confirm the results for folks who are "misled." They're dry runs at creating pretexts for questioning/overturning future elections.

Fealty to Trump means being willing to subvert *legitimate* results:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
29 Jun
Right wing anger at Gen. Milley over the "white rage" comment is really an effort to delegitimize any debate over the role of white supremacy and racial nationalism in inciting 1/6. The new select committee should engage this debate frontally. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
There's important stuff buried in the bill creating the 1/6 select committee.

Its mission is to investigate threats to our democratic institutions more broadly. It defines white supremacy as a key anti-democratic threat. That will force a crucial debate:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The right's anti-democratic nationalism turns on the idea that the opposition is illegitimate and can be excluded from the Real Nation. Once this is established, anti-democratic tactics constitute the righting of a profound wrong.

With @lionel_trolling:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
.@SenatorSinema has accidentally exposed the profound weakness of the pro-filibuster stance. She raises the prospect of legislative majorities curbing voting, without admitting this is *already* upon us. She is consigning us to that very fate. My response:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@SenatorSinema The threat posed by ending the filibuster really is frightening.

Imagine a world in which legislative majorities could pass voting restrictions over the objections of minorities!

Oh wait, we already live in that world:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@SenatorSinema Here's what makes Sinema's argument so dishonest.

Sinema claims we have more to lose than gain from ending the filibuster. But she doesn't admit to what we *actually would gain* from ending it -- a check on democratic backsliding and minority rule:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
18 Jun
An interesting move: As part of their probe of the Trump DOJ subpoening of Dems' phone records, House Judiciary Dems have demanded release of communications between the Trump WH and DOJ about those subpoenas.

We know where that could lead.

New piece:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
DOJ is still refusing to answer basic questions from @RepAdamSchiff's office about the Trump-era subpoenaing of his and @RepSwalwell's phone records, an official confirms to me.

Judiciary Dems are now demanding info from DOJ that will shed light on that:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@RepAdamSchiff @RepSwalwell “AG Garland has an interest in restoring the rule of law — of that I have no doubt. But we believe that there will be no return to the rule of law if we allow these events to be swept under the rug.”

@RepRaskin, to me. This DOJ secrecy is untenable:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
15 Jun
House Dems just released new info detailing Trump's corrupt pressure on Jeffrey Rosen (Barr's replacement) to use DOJ to subvert the election. This will get worse: Sources tell me Rosen is in talks about sitting for an interview. He can tell us much more:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The new revelations from House Dems detail a truly extraordinary effort on Trump's part to enlist DOJ in his scheme to subvert the election and remain in power illegitimately.

I summarized some of the main findings here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
If Dems can secure an interview with Jeffrey Rosen, it could fill in the full scope of Trump's efforts to corrupt DOJ into helping overturn the election.

Here's a rundown of what we could learn. We may be just scratching the surface now:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 5 tweets
11 Jun
NEW:

@RepAdamSchiff's office has repeatedly asked DOJ for info on the subpoenaing of Dems' metadata, including what the legal basis is and what prompted the move.

Incredibly, DOJ has refused to answer, a committee official tells me.

New reporting here:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@RepAdamSchiff “We have repeatedly posed basic questions to the department for more than a month, but have received virtually no information."

Intel Committee official tells me DOJ won't divulge legal basis for seeking Dems' metadata and what triggered the decision:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@RepAdamSchiff Crucial context:

Trump himself called for an investigation into alleged Adam Schiff leaks in early 2020 and early 2018.

That may broadly sync up with the new revelations about the Trump DOJ subpoenaing Dems' metadata.

I have Trump's quotes here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(