Patrick Chovanec Profile picture
Jul 2, 2021 27 tweets 10 min read Read on X
If I can impose on your patience, today is a two-fer. For my next MSFS trick, I'll be flying the classic British WW2 fighter, the Spitfire. But not just any Spitfire, mind you, the one-of-a-kind "Black Spit" of the Israeli air force.
I'll explain the story behind the 57 Black Spit in a second, but first, let's get this thing started. Starting a Spitfire can be complicated, and it took me a few tries to get it right.
The key is priming. You need to pump what they call the black "wobble ball", or the right, until the red light below it goes off, in order to create pressure for any fuel to flow. Then you need to pull that gold knob in and out about 5 times to get fuel into the engine to start.
To the left, you can see the throttle, prop handle, and fuel mixture knob, as well as the dials for rudder and elevator trim. You have to change these to certain settings for key stages of flight, in order to keep the Spitfire stable.
Because the thing about the Spitfire is, it's build to fly fast and agile. That makes it a nightmare on take off and landing, when that becomes "slow and fragile".
The issue with takeoff isn't so much keeping it going straight down the runway, though you do need to kick the rudder right to keep it from veering to the left.
No, it's that just as you start to lift off, the Spitfire gets all squirrely and wants to bank and yaw all over the place until you pick up some speed. The first time I tried to take off, a few days ago, I ended up overcorrecting and nosing straight into the ground.
So now that I've taken off from Ben Gurion and am flying over downtown Tel Aviv, I can tell the story of the Black Spit.
Israel was born in 1948, and immediately found itself in a war for survival with all of its Arab neighbors, who refused to recognize its existence. To fight, the Israelis scrambled to get their hands on any surplus weapons they could, anywhere they could find them.
They built a couple of Spitfires from assorted parts left over by the British. They bought a couple from Czechoslovakia. This one they happened to buy from Italy, in 1949, just after they won their war.
Quick aside: the reason I'm flying a Spitfire here, instead of over the White Cliffs of Dover, is because this is a fairly late model Spitfire Mk.IX. This is not the version that fought the Battle of Britain ...
The Mk.IX had a more powerful Merlin engine than the early Spitfires, which enabled them to hold their own against the new German Fw190 fighter. They were mainly used for cross-Channel raids on enemy airbases, to distract the German fighters away from Allied bombers.
In the air, the Spitfire is skittish, but extremely agile. Barrel roles and flying inverted is easy. (You try this with a Cessna 172, the engine will cut out and you may rip the wings right off).
Speaking of which, watch these jokers try it. Listen to the engine nearly cut out, then they go into a kind of upside down dive. Listen to that wind whooshing by. If they aren't exceeding the "never exceed" speed, they must be close.
Entering a shallow dive to build up speed ...
... and pulling the stick all the way back to do a loop.
Here's what that looks like from the cockpit.
So anyway, after Israel's war of independence, the Spitfires were used for training the new Israeli air force. Pretty soon, all of them were sold to Burma.

All except one.
The Commander of the new Israeli Air Force, Ezer Weizmann, served as a Spitfire pilot in the RAF in WW2. (He later became Israel's Defense Minister and, eventually, President).
When he was training in Egypt, his instructor painted his own Spitfire black, which Ezer thought was pretty cool. So he kept one of the Spitfires - this one - painted it all black, and used it as his personal aircraft to hop all around Israel.
Now it's time to land this baby back at Ben Gurion.
So I've lowered reduced speed below 160mph, lowered the gear, and brought the speed down further to 120. The problem is, the indicator isn't lighting up showing my landing gear locked. I don't know why.
Well, gear locked or not they look down, so I'm coming in. It actually wasn't as terrible as I thought it would be. But you really have to tap the brakes very gently to slow down gradually. If you stomp them, you'll flip right over onto your nose.
One tricky thing about the Spitfire is that the gear raise outwards - which means they stick down very close together, near the body. This makes it very easy for the Spitfire to topple over sideways if it gets off balance on landing.
Weizman's "Black Spit" is still airworthy, btw, and was recently (2012) restored to prime condition.
Not the Spitfire you were expecting, but the Spitfire you didn't know you needed.
I would have flown this thing over Jerusalem for you, but the terrible truth is that the rendering of the Old City in MSFS right now is TERRIBLE, and no one has fixed it yet. I hope someone does.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Chovanec

Patrick Chovanec Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @prchovanec

Nov 7, 2024
I no longer feel like I belong in this country. On a deeply personal level, its values are no longer my values, as they once were. My persistence in it feels increasingly strange and unwelcome.
This is not some angry declaration. The feeling perplexes me, more than anything else.
I say this as someone who served in the military, worked in politics, and spoke proudly and fondly of our country while living abroad.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6, 2024
Well, so it has come to pass. I cannot say I am surprised, because I did see it coming, but it is saddening nonetheless. I will not say much, because I don't trust myself to. But I do think this nation has made a grave mistake. How grave, we shall only learn in time.
This is not the country that I spent a lifetime, at home and abroad, loving and defending. It is something else, and what exactly that means for me I cannot yet say.
I'm cautious about sayihg what I really feel right now, especially on this platform, because I know it would be mocked. And that, itself, is a symptom of what I see, the glee that many now take in other Americans' sadness and fear. We are remaking ourselves in his image.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 29, 2024
Then you're a fool. We have a democratic republic. I've been a limited-government conservative Republican my whole life. In fact, some of my major criticisms of Trump are that he is too much a big-government interventionist in the economy.
This inanity about "the US is not a democracy, it's a republic" is getting way too prevalent. The US has a republican form of government - as does China and North Korea. Unlike them, it is democratic in that it derives its authority from the consent of the governed.
"The US is not a democracy, it's a republic" is a line that comes from the old John Birch Society (which was drummed out of the mainstream Republican Party because of its extreme conspiratorial views) based on a very ignorant reading of how the Founders used the term democracy.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 25, 2024
If Musk tried to withhold Starlink services to aid a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, our Defense Dept should sit him down and tell him he going to restore it or the U.S. government is appropriating the company in the interests of national security. Full stop.
I’m usually for the U.S. government taking a hands-off approach to business, but we’re talking about a wartime scenario that would almost certainly involve the U.S. in a peer-to-peer conflict and there’d be no room for fooling around.
And quite frankly if he was having conversations with any adversary country about it that would be very problematic in and of itself.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 11, 2024
1. There are times when a thread makes so many important mistakes and feeds into so many misconceptions that it's worthwhile to address it point by point. My apologies.
2. It is true that Trump's tariffs against China were ostensibly imposed for the purpose of forcing China to alter it own unfair trade practices - in large part because the President's legal authority to levy special tariffs requires him to cite this as the reason.
3. However, it was unclear from the start what the "ask" was from China - what exactly the Trump Admin wanted China to do that would allow the tariffs to be lifted. And Trump repeatedly talked about tariffs being good and beneficial in their own right.
Read 20 tweets
Jul 27, 2024
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem. As someone who used to analyze and “summarize” these bills for Congress, let me explain …
The reason the bills are “mammoth” is that they includes hundreds, even thousands of legislative changes on a wide variety of unrelated topics. Basically a “bill of bills”.
Where AI could help us by offering some context to what these often small changes actually mean, in terms of policy. Often it’s hard to understand what changing “and” to “or” in Clause 81 of Title II refers to or the impact it could have.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(