Every day I see people who, to shave 50 seconds off their journey, risk shaving 50 years off their life.
Or someone else's.
Every day I see something that challenges the claim we prioritise our survival.
I write from experience. In my teens, believe it or not, I was a boy racer, one of a gang of dunces who competed to do the most idiotic things in a motor vehicle. There was no way I should have been allowed on the road. Yet somehow we see stupid driving as a rite of passage.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is what @bbcbitesize is teaching our children about climate breakdown. I'm sorry, but it's an absolute disgrace. You could come away thinking: "on balance, it sounds pretty good". It could have been written by Exxon.
(h/t: @NickShepley) bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guide…
The BBC has a long and disgraceful history of both-sidesing the greatest threat to life on Earth. Every so often, it puts out a memo claiming it has got its act together. Then it fails again. People who make this content believe "neutrality" = impartiality. It's the opposite.
Here is one of the "positive" aspects of the collapse of our life support systems it lists: "more resources, such as oil, becoming available in places such as Alaska and Siberia when the ice melts".
Are they actually trying to misdirect and bamboozle GCSE students?
Not all of you will remember 1984, and the horrendous famine that killed a million Ethiopians. Those who do would prefer to forget it. But it's happening again, for the same criminal reasons, and once more the world is turning a blind eye.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
This famine has nothing to do with natural causes. It's striking Tigray, that was a world-renowned success story. Prosperity had been rebuilt through massive works to restore the land, protect ecosystems and raise crop production. The famine is gigantic and deliberate war crime.
The crime is being perpetrated by the Ethiopian and Eritrean armies, who are using hunger as a weapon of war. They were sent into Tigray by the Prime Minister, Abiy Ahmed.
Guess what? He has a Nobel Peace Prize.
If there's any justice, he should end up in the Hague.
I’ve become slightly obsessed with vitamin B12. Many people (especially older folk) are likely to be deficient, with a particular (but not exclusive) risk for those with vegetarian or vegan diets. So I’ve done a little research into good, cheap and accessible sources.
You really want to avoid B12 deficiency. It can cause serious physical and psychological symptoms. It takes a long time to manifest, so by the time you know about it, it can be difficult to treat. Some effects can be irreversible. Everyone should take it seriously.
The source that comes out on top in my brief survey is purple laver (Porphyra spp). This pack costs £1.99 at the local Chinese supermarket. It’s much cheaper than obtaining the same quantity of B12 through eating meat. It has other nutritional benefits too.
In Private Eye, @drphilhammond makes an excellent point. Scientists tend to avoid politics "because they hate the bluff, bluster, lies and deceit. Science is about sensible guessing ... making errors, owning errors and learning from them ... the antithesis of politics.”
It's not just that many politicians are amazingly ignorant of science. It's also that the scientific, empirical worldview is often entirely alien. So when they have to respond to scientific findings - whether on covid or climate - they repeatedly screw up.
We are rightly exercised by the lack of diversity in public life. But one aspect we discuss too little is the diversity of academic disciplines. Politics and the media are overwhelmingly dominated by humanities students. Humanities are essential, but we need a wider mix.
After doing a Twitter poll last year, in which a great majority said I should overcome my hesitation about verification and apply, I did so when the facility reopened. There's no explanation given, which reinforces my concerns about the process.
.@verified Could you please explain why you have refused my request for verification? Thank you.
The government is showering rich people's holiday homes with subsidies and tax breaks, fuelling homelessness and community death.
It's a total outrage. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Some of the facts and figures will make you rage and gnash your teeth. Massive subsidies for wealthy people, at the direct expense of the poor.
So why isn't this all over the papers?
Could it have something to do with the fact that a high proportion of editors and senior journalists have second homes?