@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Complex dynamics, such as threshold effects (tipping points) and strong interactions resulting in cascading effects, are all known drivers of systemic failure in any complex system. Yet
state-of-the-art risk analyses still do not adequately account
for them."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Furthermore, most financial risk assessment still relies on historical data, and would underestimate or completely miss the potential for thresholds and cascading effects not previously experienced…"
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "While the exact effects of crossing tipping points in the Earth system may still be 'unknown unknowns’ … the existence of planetary-scale thresholds is becoming an increasingly well-established part of the risk landscape (a known unknown) that deserves attn & deliberate action"
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "In systems science it is well
established that thresholds in systems are easily overshot
when feedback has long delays, leading to collapse.
Since shortening the time lag of how the Earth system operates
is not possible..."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 “...two things will be key to achieve a financial system that fundamentally promotes long-term sustainability:
(1) incorporating the necessary information feedback and
(2) developing structures by which this information is taken
into account and acted upon."
Incorporating information (i.e., impact metrics) that can assess the degree to which investments move us toward or away from planetary boundaries and tipping points is paramount."
"The irony is that current ESG ratings are based on a risk
perception that does not account for externalities, and therefore is unlikely to address the root causes undermining sustainability."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Today, unintelligent accountability appears to be rising in the financial sector, as a result of misalignment between sustainability ambitions and current risk frameworks and risk assessment measurements. This hampers the crucial role finance can and needs to play.”
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Shifting financial sector norms and practices is therefore not
about altruism, but about self-perseverance.”
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 "Norm entrepreneurs help to establish, socialise, and normalise attitudes and behaviours in a certain domain.
Once these norm entrepreneurs have succeeded in convincing enough people, the norm achieves a 'threshold or tipping point’”
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 I’ve suggested to Ellen that she integrate sustainability thresholds (tipping points) into her work — namely, leveraging desirable social tipping points to avert catastrophic ecological (and undesirable social) tipping points.
"...traditional risk management continues to assume that risk is generally an external event
that afflicts companies – and so companies lack agency in risk creation, and can only manage risk."
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 We call this "outside-in risk, and believe it is vital to complement this perspective with inside-out risk; in other words, the risks that companies create, which then impact other companies (as outside-in risk)…"
@BeatriceCrona@vgalaz@r3dot0 “...and also circle back to impact the company that created the risks in the first place (we might call this 'bite-you-in-the-butt risk').”
@kmac "the taxonomy’s purpose … is to set a very high bar based on what scientists [say] is needed ... to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Instead of assessing sectors or companies as they are now, the taxonomy identifies … what...activities ... will lead to a safer planet"
@kmac This sets it apart from other frameworks, such as the @FSB_TCFD which seek to identify risks arising from climate change.
Or the sustainability reporting project being developed by the @IFRSFoundation, which hosts accounting standards used across the world."
"A transformational investment will not succeed without changes in how we operate. To achieve such frameworks, three objectives must be met:..."
@DWS_Group #3 "Resolve the conflict of interest along the value chain [that] are detrimental to consumers, who face uncertain definitions, higher costs and lack protection as financial products make ESG claims that cannot be verified."
@DWS_Group "Then came a formal complaint by Bill Baue … to the board of the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) about potential conflict of interests. The complaint centred around the proposed methodologies used to guide companies and investors towards net zero…"
It makes sense to briefly set the context of the significance of the issues raised in this Complaint.
In a nutshell, the Science Based Targets initiative has gained significance beyond its own direct purview, raising the stakes for it to exhibit deep integrity.
A few examples:
SBTi serves as a model for the broader initiative it has spawned, the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN), which is establishing similar thresholds-and-allocations-based methodologies for other areas of ecological impact, such as biodiversity and water.
As an original instigator of @sciencetargets it deeply saddens me to tweet this thread on the formal complaint I submitted to the SBTi Executive Board on self-dealing conflict of interests concerns.
@sciencetargets The substance of the complaint is validated by a scientific study by Anders Bjørn & Concordia University colleagues recently published as an accepted manuscript in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Research Letters:
@sciencetargets Bjørn et al raise 2 key intertwining technical problems: (mis)alignment with the “latest climate science,” and what they call “emissions imbalances” — i.e., collective carbon footprints under- or overshooting the carbon budget (slices of the pie = less or more than a single pie).
Abstract: We report three major and confronting environmental issues that have received little attention and require urgent action.
First, we review the evidence that future environmental conditions will be far more dangerous than currently believed. The scale of the threats to the biosphere & all its lifeforms—including humanity—is in fact so great that it is difficult to grasp for even well-informed experts
Second, we ask what political or economic system, or leadership, is prepared to handle the predicted disasters, or even capable of such action.