Many of us are getting through the pandemic and ongoing domestic insurgency in part by playing mobile games to escape—so as a digital culture professor and former video game reviewer, I thought I'd make a ranking. sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-recomm…
1/ I figured I'd also do a brief thread to highlight a few of the 100 mobile video games listed at PROOF—at the link above—that really stand out to me for one reason or another. If you try out only one or two of the 100 games listed, these would be some good options to check out.
2/ There are 100 games on this ranking of mobile games, and I've only played *2* all the way through *multiple* times; it's just not something I tend to do. But I did with these 2 games, whose art, tone and complexity is perfectly calibrated: a Card RPG (l) and strategy game (r).
3/ Having said that, because sports games aren't really subject to a "playing all the way through" analysis, I'll say that the game I spent the *most* time playing—including winning many Retro Bowls—is the one below, which is endlessly customizable and has a great franchise mode.
4/ Here are two games I got wonderfully lost in for quite some time, as they both create incredibly deep and believable magical worlds that are well *worth* getting lost in for some time: the former is a Strategy game and the latter a Card RPG. Can't recommend them highly enough.
5/ Games that are absolute artistic achievements that you just want to stare at:
6/ Four more games particularly noteworthy for their artistic vision:
7/ Here are four of the eight most addictive games on the list:
9/ (It probably goes without saying, but Proof subscribers are warmly invited to suggest new games for me to play in the comments at the link atop this thread. I try my best to check out games recommended by members of the PROOF community—and rank them if I feel they deserve it.)
10/ Okay, so how about the *strangest* games in the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games? Easy:
11/ Four more *strange* games in the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games:
12/ If you like "adorable" games, I've got four games that'll have you clutching your stuffed unicorn and shouting, "He's so fluffy! I'm gonna die!"
13/ And second-to-last, here are the games I found myself most viscerally invested in—anxious, consumed, totally transported but fixated. You might even say "ensorcelled." (Besides Gris and Kingdom Two Crowns, both of which I mentioned already.) The untitled game is "Grim Quest."
14/ Finally—as I often get asked by folks who don't play video games at *all* where they should start if they do decide to just *try* playing games on their Android phone—here (besides Threes) are the best super-duper-starter games that made the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games:
15/ (I should say that Alone is a *very* hard game—it's just also very, very simple. It can be picked up and played instantaneously.)
This is the serial child rapist the Dear Leader is about to pardon to save himself.
Any MAGA providing rhetorical cover for Donald Trump as he seeks to cover up years of pimping teens—teens he'd fed booze and drugs—at the Plaza Hotel in the 1990s is as good as a pedo themselves.
Trump had his own teen rape victim procurer. He even turned his sex trafficking ring at the Plaza into a business that thereafter was accused of human rights violations by its workers—who deemed themselves slaves. What Epstein did in FL Trump not only allowed but mirrored in NYC.
All this is based on existing reporting. I've compiled hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of reliable major-media sources on these matters into PROOF OF DEVILRY, which will be published shortly as the seventh book in the NYT-bestselling Proof Series.
(1) Trump and Epstein became friends in 1987, not 1990. The New York Times inexplicably cuts 3 years off their 17-plus-year friendship.
(2) Their friendship did *not* end because Epstein was a creep. It ended over a Florida real estate deal. nytimes.com/2025/07/19/us/…
To the credit of the NYT, it does eventually clarify Point #2 in the report.
I do wish it spent more time on the fact that an anonymous person dimed out Epstein after Trump got angry at Epstein over the real estate deal in 2004—and that Trump has a history of diming people out.
That question alone could change everything.
If in fact Trump extended his long history of being a disgusting snitch only when it personally benefits him by reporting Epstein to the police in 2004—or having an agent do it—it would confirm he knew exactly what Epstein was up to.
Everyone in America needs to read this FREE—I’ve gifted it below—report from the conservative WALL STREET JOURNAL about Trump and Epstein.
Apparently the president has now threatened to sue the WSJ over this 100% accurate report due to how damaging it is. wsj.com/politics/trump…
Holy actual literal shit OMG
By the way, the answer to the riddle in the note (in effect, “What do you get for men [Trump and Epstein] who have everything?”) is “You get them something one isn’t *allowed* to have.”
Trump then writes that he and Epstein have the thing they want in common—and it “never ages.”
Can I make the blindingly obvious observation that now that we know Trump and his crew doctored the Epstein video we can't possibly trust that anything else they release will be all they actually have?
Wouldn't you just assume documents are being *burned and shredded* right now?
Like aren't we actually past the point of no return here? The second we learned that they cut out 3 minutes from the Epstein video and tried to pass it off as a legitimate piece of evidence, wasn't that pretty much the end of any Epstein credibility for the whole administration?
You don't have to be a former federal investigator to know that every moment between the release of that fake video and the inevitable future decision by Trump to release "everything" was a moment that Trump goons at DOJ/FBI spent destroying evidence that didn't center Democrats
What would Trump do if this song went viral today?
WARNING: This song goes hard and makes no apologies.
LYRICS:
Gather round and I'll tell you of two Florida men
Who for twenty or so years were the best of friends
One of them ended up mysteriously dead
While the other one sleeps in a White House bed
I have no difficulty saying that Trump and Musk caused some of the 50+ flood deaths in Texas.
And here's why: these two men with no expertise in disaster preparedness were told not to cut the positions they cut, and were told people would die if they did.
And then people died.
Moreover, Democrats are never going to start winning elections again until they're willing to call a thing just what it is.
Texas Democrats should be clear and persistent in saying that public service cuts overseen by non-experts desperate for billionaire tax cuts killed people.
And if Republicans respond by saying that Democrats are politicizing these deaths, the Democrats should respond: THAT'S BECAUSE THE DEATHS ARE POLITICAL. POLITICIANS CAUSED THEM.