Many of us are getting through the pandemic and ongoing domestic insurgency in part by playing mobile games to escape—so as a digital culture professor and former video game reviewer, I thought I'd make a ranking. sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-recomm…
1/ I figured I'd also do a brief thread to highlight a few of the 100 mobile video games listed at PROOF—at the link above—that really stand out to me for one reason or another. If you try out only one or two of the 100 games listed, these would be some good options to check out.
2/ There are 100 games on this ranking of mobile games, and I've only played *2* all the way through *multiple* times; it's just not something I tend to do. But I did with these 2 games, whose art, tone and complexity is perfectly calibrated: a Card RPG (l) and strategy game (r).
3/ Having said that, because sports games aren't really subject to a "playing all the way through" analysis, I'll say that the game I spent the *most* time playing—including winning many Retro Bowls—is the one below, which is endlessly customizable and has a great franchise mode.
4/ Here are two games I got wonderfully lost in for quite some time, as they both create incredibly deep and believable magical worlds that are well *worth* getting lost in for some time: the former is a Strategy game and the latter a Card RPG. Can't recommend them highly enough.
5/ Games that are absolute artistic achievements that you just want to stare at:
6/ Four more games particularly noteworthy for their artistic vision:
7/ Here are four of the eight most addictive games on the list:
9/ (It probably goes without saying, but Proof subscribers are warmly invited to suggest new games for me to play in the comments at the link atop this thread. I try my best to check out games recommended by members of the PROOF community—and rank them if I feel they deserve it.)
10/ Okay, so how about the *strangest* games in the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games? Easy:
11/ Four more *strange* games in the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games:
12/ If you like "adorable" games, I've got four games that'll have you clutching your stuffed unicorn and shouting, "He's so fluffy! I'm gonna die!"
13/ And second-to-last, here are the games I found myself most viscerally invested in—anxious, consumed, totally transported but fixated. You might even say "ensorcelled." (Besides Gris and Kingdom Two Crowns, both of which I mentioned already.) The untitled game is "Grim Quest."
14/ Finally—as I often get asked by folks who don't play video games at *all* where they should start if they do decide to just *try* playing games on their Android phone—here (besides Threes) are the best super-duper-starter games that made the PROOF Top 100 Android Video Games:
15/ (I should say that Alone is a *very* hard game—it's just also very, very simple. It can be picked up and played instantaneously.)
Imagine being a 42 year-old pleading with a known pedophilic sex criminal to fly you to his island so you can party with girls he assures you will be 25 or younger.
Then imagine lying about it to hundreds of millions. Even after your lies are caught.
You don't hate Elon enough.
Instead of saying—as honor demands—"I made horrible mistakes for which there's no excuse, I'll take time away from public life to reflect on them," he's kept lying, attacked media, tried to distract, and obscenely said he worked harder than Epstein's victims to get the Files out.
Now imagine that this happens during the same 12-month period this man gleefully—without having any idea what he was doing, or even *caring* if he had any idea—cut a massive foreign aid program whose erasure is projected to cause *more than 10 million deaths* in the years ahead.
This major report on the Greg Bovino-to-Tom Homan handover in Minneapolis at once reveals that the Trump regime hasn’t changed its plans for ICE *and* serves as a primer on the many aspects of the criminal justice system Homan lied about today.
It can't be sufficiently emphasized that the Trump regime has at all points lied about every aspect of its immigration agenda, every aspect of how immigration enforcement works and every aspect of the justice system that touches upon immigration enforcement.
It's all a long con.
No one is saying that every American must understand the justice system.
That would be ideal, but it's impractical.
The problem is that our justice system lies at the center of our politics—which means ignorance about how it works is ripe for abuse by an authoritarian regime.
I shouldn't even have to say this, but precisely *no one* in the independent journalism sphere is saying that Trump can *legally* cancel the midterms.
So corporate media should put on its thinking cap and ask themselves what independent journalists *are* saying.
Yes.... *that*.
It's Month 1 of a 10-month plan and they're already illegally invading countries, illegally occupying U.S. cities, posting Nazi memes from government accounts almost daily, and publicly saying there should be no elections anymore. You think their plan is to do *anything* legally?
So I've no idea why corporate media keeps sanctimoniously reminding us of something we already know—that Trump can't *legally* cancel elections. Because that's not where the debate or mystery is now. The question is whether he thinks he can wait until 2028 to declare martial law.
The question media should be asking: if Minneapolis only needs 600 police officers to perform all general law enforcement activities in the city, why did Trump send 3,000 federal agents to execute a statutorily and constitutionally *much* smaller task?
Answer? He wanted a *war*.
Based on the size of the task and authority ICE actually has—merely executing judicial warrants for already-identified undocumented persons—we'd expect an ICE "surge" in Minneapolis to be about 100 agents.
Trump sent *30 times that*.
Because he wants to declare an insurrection.
So if you're an American paying only small attention to Minneapolis and wondering why things are crazy there, imagine *your* town being the target of an *unprecedented* federal op.
Big deal, right?
Now imagine the feds sending *30 times* too many men—most *virtually untrained*.
(🧵) THREAD: There’s no purpose in debating Trump supporters on Venezuela. They lack the background to participate in a coherent conversation. Do they know Trump is backing a socialist despot over a capitalist who won the 2024 election by 34 points? No.
It gets worse from there.
1/ People without principles, like MAGAs, desperately alight on random anecdotes to try to “prove” points—as they don’t know how to *actually* prove a point, make an argument, hold a consistent position, marshal evidence, or maintain logical throughlines across diverse scenarios.
2/ So for instance, they’ll tell you that the justness of what Trump did is “proven” by how some Venezuelans reacted to it. But these are the same folks whose political ideology has long been grounded in denying international law and the sovereignty or interests of other nations.
As detailed in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption, Trump used Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani and a megadonor to launch clandestine negotiations in Venezuela that would've effectuated some version of the deal. America is being lied to every which way.
What the NYT-bestselling Proof Series has shown—across 2,500 pages and over 15,000 reliable major media citations from around the world—is that what we think of as many different scandals is *one* scandal: the Trump-Russia Scandal. Ukraine, Israel, KSA, Venezuela... even Epstein.
The Trump-Russia Scandal, as a research topic, is so vast—it covers so many continents, decades, and scandals in various nations—that we can analogize being a scholar of it to being a scholar of the Cold War or the Gilded Age.
We keep speaking of trees without seeing the forest.