SAGE: this will increase the risk of variants, will make it harder to contain variants and ethnic and disadvantaged communities will face the brunt of a lack of mitigations
Johnson: Thats a risk we are willing for them to take
Recommendations by SAGE are to try and keep transmission down.
Better support for isolation
Isolating close contacts is important, so the decision to scrap it in schools isn't supported by SAGE
Test and trace still important, still needs improving
Asymptomatic testing, important that LFDs are used appropriately and their limitations are properly explained to the public, this isn't happening
WFH still recommended
Workplaces need mandatory standards and regulations for ventilation, I guess this goes against gov ideology
Masks have high potential for significantly cutting transmission, clear guidence should be set out
So Johnson is ignoring SAGE again, makes me wonder why they still bother
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Oh what a suprise, Together Declaration are part of this network, and members of the Exec like UsForThem founder Kingsley accused anyone who said they were a hard right political project of smears and defamation
2/ Founded as anti-lockdown but going straight into anti-vax talking points, Together then switched to anti Ulez, anti net zero heading towards climate change denial
3/ They have been one of the main groups peddling nonsense about the WHO pandemic treaty, starting two years ago with Farage then becoming the leading face of a new astroturf group
While much of the media claims the inquiry is accomplishing nothing, its slowly revealed the gov knew transmission occurs in schools and causes harm to a not insignificant number of children
2/ The bill gives the Secretary of State the power to add to the list of interests that can access your childrens data through secondary legislation avoiding parliamentary scrutiny
3/ The Bill also permits 14-18 year olds to be targeted with political marketing
3/ More and more evidence emerges of the long term harms caused by covid, but the UK govs preferred paedatricians continue to peddle claims that with enough infections children will develop lasting immunity
Said this would occur after 1 infection, what is it now? 5? 7? 10?🤷♂️
🧵Cass Review
Not had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but have had time to look through the main points
What positives can be taken from it? The time spent on waiting lists was identified as a major issue, all children's services are massively underfunded at the moment
2/ I would like to think that this will lead to an investment in all children's support services like CAHMS, more pastoral support in schools etc
That would be a positive outcome, regardless of what else is included in the review, unfortunately real terms cuts are the reality
3/ What matters is how government interprets the review and what it chooses to implement, additional funding for children isn't going to be prioritised over tax cuts to appease RW papers
Imagine if the billions from last round of tax cuts had instead been invested in children