it's that proclaimin' hour: the more I learn about the lineage of each, the more I think a blending of the open science, semweb/linked data, and piracy communities would be an extremely healthy thing for the human knowledge ecosystem. but I still don't know much much they talk rn
the semweb/ld people are maybe a decade ahead of the open science people on the cultural burnout from purity/overpromising vs. tooling to make it real problem. the piracy people are maybe 15y ahead on incentive systems for uploading data and decentralized curation of metadata
if academia was as nimble as infosec, it would pick off the admins, sysops, and moderators of private BitTorrent trackers: they built what we're trying to build a decade ago and did it at the scale of the entirety of human culture, not just one scientific subdiscipline.
the semweb/ld people are probably present in many of the same institutions that the scientists are, but we don't talk to them because we have no idea what kind of incredible work is being done in the libraries of our universities.
scientists interested in the always-scattered notion of "openness" serve as a profoundly underexplored bed of technological development, user testing, and parallel thought about provenance for the lineage of semweb/ld developers currently taking refuge in corporate world.
these are just technical communities and communities of practice. if we were to also collaborate with the information infrastructure studies and STS researchers, we might stand a real chance of turning the rudder away from the totalization of the corporate knowledge economy.
("just" =/= "lesser than" here^^. saying we should work with the people who study how digital infrastructure is developed as we develop digital infrastructure if we want it to work.)
I think we should be humbled as we build databases with dozens, hundreds, and thousands of datasets by the fact that piracy communities built infra for hundreds of millions of datasets for pretty close to zero dollars. when they get shut down, the data is restored in a few weeks.
from analyzing the incentive structures of these systems we might reframe development priorities for scientific infrastructure around systems for developing sustained digital communities with p2p backbones and expressive UI; instead of rigid specs and renting servers
know how much**

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with jonny saunders

jonny saunders Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @json_dirs

4 Jul
"practicality" might have been the worst choice of word possible here. I meant as compared to maybe "ineffability," favoring embracing folk knowledge. In this context it means vs. idealism, academic impossibility. humbling how the meaning flips over such a small cultural divide
I was using linked data here as if it were a near-synonym for semantic web, a subconcept of the broader idea: that's how I've heard it used. but to some people in these communities it is an opposing idea, a reaction against semweb. so close and yet so far
the variation in reaction is instructive: some hear semweb as the totalizing ontology part (it's impossible, it failed), some as the technology and its effects (thriving under different names!) some hear it as the syntax and standards of triplets and beyond (still don't know!!)
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct 19
Today we're releasing Autopilot - a Python framework for performing complex behavioral experiments by distributing them over swarms of Raspberry Pis. Let me tell you how we've rewritten what you should consider possible in your experiments /1
site: auto-pi-lot.com
We think that to make transformative progress in understanding the brain, we need to study complex, naturalistic behavior. We know we're not alone there, but the technical demands of these experiments start to sound almost comical: eg. how hard would it be for you to... /2
measure pupil dilation, respiration, and running speed; track the position of a dozen points in 3d, record hundreds of channels of ephys while an animal performs some complex task in a virtual reality space that you render in real time? /3
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(