Robert Colvile Profile picture
Jul 6, 2021 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
We've just published a huge set of polling from @FrankLuntz on the new values and language of British politics. You can find the full thing here, but I thought I'd summarise the most arresting findings. (Warning: long, but worthwhile) cps.org.uk/media/press-re…
First things first: the public is really pissed off! Solid majority for 'fuck 'em all' to both business and political leaders Image
Likewise, when we asked them to pick the words that represented their feelings towards same, they were overwhelmingly negative ImageImage
(Quick ops note: Frank's method is to give people a load of choices and ask them to pick their top two/three/four. Hence percentages adding to more than 100.)
Not to belabour the point, but when you ask people what politicians are in it for, this is the answer you get... Image
And likewise, these were their top picks when asked to describe British businesses. Image
As I wrote in my @thesundaytimes column, there's a huge challenge here for free market types like me - it's not just that people don't like business, but that messages and language around aspiration, competitiveness, entrepreneurship just don't resonate thetimes.co.uk/article/aspira…
So what do voters want instead? Well, here are their top picks. Image
They're worried about the NHS... Image
They're worried about crime and increasingly about cost of living - expect both to start hitting the headlines much more often... ImageImage
And they're worried about the gap between rich and poor, especially Labour voters. Image
Politically, the big gap between Tory and Labour (which I want to write about more) is optimism vs pessimism. That may be down to who's in power, or it may be deeper-rooted. The gap in these three questions is fascinating in terms of, essentially, whether Britain is broken ImageImageImage
There's lots in the survey about woke, cancel culture etc, but that's been covered elsewhere so I won't go into it here. But the age breakdown here is utterly fascinating, which goes hand in hand with the party breakdown above. Image
There is loads of utterly fascinating stuff in the survey (that link again here cps.org.uk/media/press-re…), but I'll finish on some personal highlights
This is from the business questions we asked, but applies more widely. Climate change isn't a partisan issue any more. Uniquely (says Frank), the right and the left are both concerned about it. Image
(Uniquely as in vs other countries.)

Climate is also the exception to the rule that, as Frank told the Sunday Telegraph, people mostly just want companies to shut up about CSR and purpose and focus on doing a better job for their workers and customers telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/07/0…
Other striking findings: always call yourself an employer, never a business, and delete 'corporation' from the dictionary. Image
Even Tory voters care about protecting the poorest and most vulnerable Image
Overwhelmingly, we all think we put in more than we get out... Image
...and that government is wasting the cash it already spends, either on the rich (Labour) or immigrants/scroungers (Tories). (Stunningly low figures for 'the poor', 'people like me', 'hardworking taxpayers' etc.) ImageImage
I don't think it's in the slide deck, but it is also impossible to overstate how much Tory voters hate foreign aid spending. Sorry, Andrew Mitchell, but they're not with you on this.
Finally, a quick illustration of why the Tories are in a better position than Labour. Both the public and Tory voters prefer the party of today to Cameron's (though there is a lingering pash for Thatcher). But everyone still misses Mr Tony Image
If you found any of that interesting, please join @FrankLuntz and @nfergus for a @CPSThinkTank event tomorrow on 'The New Language of Politics', at which they'll be discussing all this and more. Sign up here us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
And obviously please follow me, Frank and @CPSThinkTank for more insight, both from his survey work and our amazing team of researchers
PS For those asking why the language differs on the final slide between ‘hate’ and ‘strongly oppose’, it’s a typo. We changed it for both but didn’t update properly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Colvile

Robert Colvile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rcolvile

May 8
Big new report out on the immigration system from @CPSThinkTank, by @RobertJenrick, @NeilDotObrien & @MalvernianKarl. There’s a huge amount of really interesting stuff in there – so let me run through the key points/charts. (1/?) cps.org.uk/research/takin…
Image
The first and most obvious point is that there has been a HUGE (and historically unprecedented) rise in net migration. In the 25 years before Tony Blair took office, cumulative migration was almost 100x lower than in the 25 years after. Image
Over the last few years in particular, the numbers have gone into overdrive - driven by a massive surge in non-EU migration.
Image
Image
Read 31 tweets
Mar 24
Is Britain ready for the Baby Bust? My column this week is on, quite literally, the biggest story in the world - what's happening to population. Quick thread as some of the stats are pretty jaw-dropping (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/were-d…
A big new study in the Lancet confirms what demographers have known for ages - we're heading for a shrinking planet. By 2100, fertility rates in 97% of countries will be below replacement rates healthdata.org/news-events/ne…
But the fall isn't even! At the moment, Africa, India and China all have approx 1.4 billion people. By 2100, India is expected to be at 1.5 billion. China will almost halve, to 800 million. But Africa may be at 4.2 billion.
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Mar 19
Yes, it's another prominent article in the Guardian pretending that we don't need to build any more houses. And like all the others, it's riddled with glaring errors. Just in case anyone believes this bullshit, let's do the thread thing. (1/far too many) theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2…
Central thesis of this article: there is no shortage of housing. It's all about landlords. Literally 'mass-scale housebuilding isn't necessary'. Punch! But, er, wrong. Image
Right, let's kick off. (Not screenshotting every par as this bloody thing is 1800 words long.) Two claims - the familiar one that we have more households than homes, so can't possibly have a crisis, and a new one that London is the same size, so how can prices rise? Image
Read 31 tweets
Feb 13
I've written before about @SadiqKhan's thoroughly awful record on housing, and his relentless attempts to gaslight London into believing the opposite, but surely even his most loyal cronies can't defend the latest figures, published today. (1/?)
Target for GLA affordable housing starts, 2021-6: 23,900 to 27,100 p.a.

Actual GLA affordable housing starts, first three quarters of 2023-4: 874
Council house starts the Mayor boasted about in May: 23,000

Council house starts under the 'Building Council Homes for Londoners' programme since May: zero. (Yes, zero.)
Read 8 tweets
Jan 30
The new population projections are out. And they show (shock!) that we either need to cut net migration, or build WAY more houses. Preferably, both. Quick thread (1/)
As @CPSThinkTank has pointed out repeatedly, the 300k a year housing target is based on a decade-old estimate that net migration would be 170,500 a year. The levels we've had have been... not that. Image
@CPSThinkTank The most recent assumption was that net migration would, despite current sky-high peaks, fall back to 245k in the long run. Many of us were not convinced - not least since the original estimate behind that was already invalidated by visa data at the point of publication! Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 21
Everyone is talking about Horizon/Fujitsu. But there are some key aspects everyone has missed - including the big reason Fujitsu kept getting contracts even after the scandal broke. Have done a deep dive for my column - thread below (1/?) thetimes.co.uk/article/the-vi…
Image
The story starts in the 60s, when the Wilson govt hits on a new solution to Britain's lack of competitiveness - not nationalisation, but national direction. It forces private firms to merge (at gunpoint) to create 'national champions' which can export to the world.
One of these is British Leyland. Another - Tony Benn's brainchild - is International Computers Limited, or ICL. This is meant to be Britain's answer to IBM. Spoiler warning: it isn't.
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(