"In 1974, the CIA produced a study on 'climatological research as it pertains to intelligence problems.' It warned of a new era of weird weather, leading to political unrest and mass migration (which, in turn, would cause more unrest)." (1/x) theguardian.com/science/2021/j…
This week, the Guardian has published an excerpt from the great @alicebell's new climate book OUR GREATEST EXPERIMENT. A thread.
“'The climate change began in 1960,' the report’s first page informs us, 'but no one, including the climatologists, recognized it.'"
"Crop failures in the Soviet Union and India in the early 1960s had been attributed to standard unlucky weather. The US shipped grain to India and the Soviets killed off livestock to eat, 'and premier Nikita Khrushchev was quietly deposed.'"
"But, the report argued, the world ignored this warning, as the population continued to grow and states made massive investments in energy, technology and medicine. Meanwhile, the weird weather rolled on, shifting to a collection of west African countries just below the Sahara."
"People in Mauritania, Senegal, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Chad 'became the first victims of the climate change,' the report argued, but their suffering was masked by other struggles – or the richer parts of the world simply weren’t paying attention." 1974.
"As the effects of climate change started to spread to other parts of the world, the early 1970s saw reports of droughts, crop failures and floods from Burma, Pakistan, North Korea, Costa Rica, Honduras, Japan, Manila, Ecuador, USSR, China, India and the US."
"But few people seemed willing to see a pattern: 'The headlines from around the world told a story still not fully understood or one we don’t want to face,' the report said."
"This claim that no one was paying attention was not entirely fair. ... A few months before the CIA report was issued, the US secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, had addressed the UN under a banner of applying science to 'the problems that science has helped to create...'"
"...including his worry that the poorest nations were now threatened with 'the possibility of climatic changes in the monsoon belt and perhaps throughout the world.'"
"By 1977, the problem was seen more through the lens of the oil crisis rather than overseas famine. As Americans felt the difficulties of unusual weather and oil shortage, the New York Times mused, perhaps this might unlock some change?"
"The paper reported that both energy and climate experts shared the hope 'that the current crisis is severe enough and close enough to home to encourage the interest and planning required to deal with these long-range issues before the problems get too much worse.'" (x/x)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"One of the largest nodule deposits is the Clarion Clipperton Zone in the Pacific Ocean 1,000 miles west of Mexico and roughly 500 miles south of Hawaii — well outside any country's territory." (1/x) axios.com/undersea-minin…
"Exploration rights to the underwater field are controlled by the International Seabed Authority, created in 1982 by the United Nations to ensure mining in international waters benefits all countries, not just wealthy ones."
"Through sponsorship deals with three tiny Pacific island nations vulnerable to climate change — Nauru, Tonga and Kiribati — The Metals Company secured exploration rights to approximately 150,000 square kilometers of the ISA-licensed seabed."
“What this means, in practical terms, is that there are a lot of old buildings in Miami that might look good on the outside, but inside, they are barely standing. ‘It’s like cancer in the building, eating it from the inside,’ says one developer.” rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
“While renovating a South Beach hotel, one architect I know discovered the structural walls were so weak you could practically knock them down with a hammer.”
“A lawyer involved in redevelopment of an old structure on 5th Street told me the concrete wall was so soft that he could reach into it and grab a handful of sand.”
Yesterday, I published a long piece on the off-the-charts Pacific Northwest heat dome and what @GovInslee called "the beginning of a permanent emergency." But I left two big and important thoughts out. A thread (1/x). nymag.com/intelligencer/…
The first is well-captured in this bold Guardian front page. The newspaper has repurposed a comment by @Sir_David_King and stood behind it entirely, without quotes or attribution, as, effectively, a statement of fact.
To a certain degree, this probably overstates the near-term lesson of the heat dome, since even under present climate conditions this event appears to be shockingly unlikely. But precisely where it hit really does matter, and it is perhaps all the more terrifying as a result.
A very thorough, vivid ominous read of the leaked I.P.C.C. report and its implications for Europe. A thread (1/x) politico.eu/article/how-cl…
"The scientists warn that billions of people are at risk of chronic water scarcity, tens of millions exposed to hunger and places near the equator will experience unsurvivable heat, unless steps are taken to build up defenses against climate shocks and cut emissions fast."
"During la canicule, the heat wave of 2003, European cities cooked their people. Something like 80,000 people died. Under any future warming scenario, a summer like 2003 will be disturbingly normal."
“I was feeling immediate symptoms of heat exhaustion just being out there. It was already in the 90s at 9 a.m., and then on Monday when we finished up, it was over 100. I am definitely concerned that someone could get hurt and it could be fatal.” (1/x) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
“The workers were sweating, very red; it’s extremely hot outside and they’re wearing layers of clothing to protect themselves from the sun. They were in long-sleeved sweaters, completely covered from head to toe, including face masks.”
“And they looked pretty beat. Some of them had been working from 3 a.m. or 4 a.m. And there were others who had started working overnight, at 11 p.m. to midnight, and were still there around the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 a.m.”
“Despite three decades of political efforts and a wealth of research on the causes and catastrophic impacts of climate change, global carbon dioxide emissions have continued to rise and are 60% higher today than they were in 1990.” (1/x) annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/an…
“Exploring this rise through nine thematic lenses—climate governance, the fossil fuel industry, geopolitics, economics, mitigation modeling, energy systems, inequity, lifestyles, and social imaginaries—draws out multifaceted reasons for our collective failure.”
“However, a common thread that emerges across the reviewed literature is the central role of power, manifest in many forms, from a dogmatic political-economic hegemony and influential vested interests to narrow techno-economic mindsets and ideologies of control.”