Okay, here’s my question: if you believe the “extreme manifestations” of contemporary civil rights and racial justice rhetoric are easy to separate from the more reasonable and traditional manifestations, are there any major ideas endorsed by MLK that you still oppose today?
And if yes, do you believe you would you have criticized King in 1967 prior to his death or not?
Can you cite some major national civil rights or racial justice advocates directly and unreservedly promoting these ideas? (Slides from random DEI trainings don't count)
The reason this is important is that the tactic being adopted is to take random chaff about racial inequality (e.g., bad DEI trainings) and to pretend these are the main thrust of racial justice and civil rights advocacy today, meriting the current backlash
But this is nonsense in at least two respects:
1. These radical new ideas are either things that MLK et al. believed in the 60s, or else fringe ideas that you have to go looking for
2. Racial justice thinking is WAY MORE popular today than during the supposedly "traditional" era
MLK would have endorsed, and indeed campaigned for, virtually every modern-day civil rights argument with substantial uptake among progressives. The idea that we've somehow broadly graduated to another tier of radicalism is ahistorical
Of course you occasionally run into outright racial separatists and the like - but rather famously, those existed in the "traditional" civil rights era too! And they were much more intellectually influential than they are today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Stancil

Will Stancil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whstancil

8 Jul
Not to repeatedly belabor the obvious, but “CRT” is just being used as a catchall code for “literally anything related to race that makes a white person feel bad.” It’s a way of pretending all those parts of history or politics are something separate from the I-have-a-dream parts
White conservatives have been running into an issue, which is that they are substantively losing on racial justice and civil rights. The public is increasingly against them. So they’re trying to divide off all the stuff that people find uncomfortable and attack only that.
A QUICK GUIDE TO CRT:

The parts of the history of race in America where the good guys win and everything works out in the end = not CRT

The parts of the history of race in America where white people are villains, problems are not solved, and they persist to the present = CRT
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
It seems like a party dedicated to winning the culture war, rather than avoiding it, could make hay of the GOP's straightforward support of mob violence, constitutional disorder, and insurrectionary anger?
"Ashli Babbit had it coming" is not a hard case to make.
Anyway, notice how the endorsement of force in defense of the liberal state takes elevates emotions a little? These are the tools conservatives use. The reason the insurrectionary far right makes such a good culture war foil is that it lets liberals use them too.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jul
Some reporters keep reporting Republicans saying "Yeah haha we're just trying to delay this thing as long as possible to sink Biden's agenda" and then other reporters turn around and report "Republicans are still undecided on this bill, for reasons" with a totally straight face
What if the "linkage" to reconciliation bill - which was publicly discussed throughout the negotiations - is not the actual reason the GOP is backing away from the bipartisan bill
The GOP literally just played this game with the Jan. 6 commission - asked for a bunch of conditions, was given them, and then backed off the bill anyway. We're going through the exact same process and yet, incredibly, some reporters think the issue is the substance of the deal?
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
Centrists have been spewing this nonsense for years and it's never made more sense: "The senators with knife-edge margins are free to alienate the party with controversial stands, while the senators with huge electoral buffers are easily pressured"
Manchin can only win elections by the skin of his teeth and can't afford to lose any of his base. He's MORE structurally bound to the party than a Ron Wyden or a Tammy Duckworth, who could survive any number of spectacular political bellyflops
The problem here is that journalists don't think about numbers real good and they say "Well, WV is a red state, therefore Manchin should just be a Republican and he'll win his elections," without considering that most of Manchin's voters are, in fact, still Democrats
Read 4 tweets
2 Jul
Brian's idea here is a voting tax credit. Maybe it would work, maybe not.

Regardless of whether it does, the key is CREATIVE THINKING. When the plane's in a death spiral, don't sit placidly at the controls and try to fly normally. Try Plan A, try Plan B, try Plan C.
Obviously the best path for Democrats worried about democracy would be normal legislation like HR1. But if that's not going to work, if they're stuck using reconciliation, that doesn't make the crisis go away! Failure is no excuse to pretend the problem doesn't exist.
Sometimes you get the sense that some Democrats rather enjoy having major reforms blocked, because it allows them to mentally revert back to a much happier world where the crises they were trying to solve simply don't exist and they can busy themselves with tax policy or whatever
Read 4 tweets
1 Jul
What I think is so stupid about the "is it genes or culture" debate - I mean, besides the obvious - is that even minimal exposure to successful people immediately reveals that it's most often neither.
Successful people don't usually succeed because they were given some kind of special intellectual toolset that they used to go out and beat the competition.

They succeed because... drumroll, please.... they are friends and family with other successful people!
Social networks are more-or-less inherited from birth, they often neatly follow racial or ethnic lines, and they transmit success between generations, all without any need for the successful people themselves to have any especially remarkable qualities whatsoever.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(