Why ERCOT had a close call June 14-16: 1. Demand high for June (70 GW; T in 90s), but not for summer peak (expected ~77 GW, or 80+GW in heat wave) 2. Winds very slow 3. Thermal power plant outages higher than expected (~15% of 64 GW fleet) throughout month 4. Solar kept lights on
ERCOT's summer assessment of resource adequacy unrealistically expects to get 95% output from its 64 GW thermal fleet during summer peak demand. But outages have stayed ~10-15+%, and output is often below 90% even at plants that don't report outages.
As I noted here, 20 GW of ERCOT's 64 GW thermal + hydro fleet is >40 years old, and 30 GW is >30 years old. Expecting 95% output from it when we need it most seems like wishful thinking, especially given recent levels of outages.
With ERCOT's thermal fleet aging, almost all growth has been solar & wind. Solar topping 6 GW kept the lights on while winds were so stagnant that DFW had its worst ozone smog day in 15 years. Expected unprecedented growth in solar will ease strain in future summer afternoons.
ERCOT's outage data shows outages in June at many of the same plants that struggled in February -- Parish gas and coal, Limestone coal, Barnie Davis gas, Sandy Creek coal, etc. ERCOT's "firm" power plants haven't been so firm, even without extreme summer T or drought yet.
Key caveat: I see some oddities in ERCOT outage data. E.g., Martin Lake reported "fuel problems / repairs" at its 3 huge coal units, but claimed zero reduction in capacity. So, its 2400 MW doesn't appear as outage in my plots, but may have been important.
Reporting treated the June 14-18 outages as an anomaly due to a heat wave. But it wasn’t that hot, and outages were high all month. It’s the expectations of “firm” performance that are overly optimistic. forbes.com/sites/nicholas…
Given all of the above, hard to see how ERCOT would keep the lights on if we get record heat with slow winds. No need for PTSD from February; any trouble would likely be less widespread and pass as temperatures cool and winds pick up, but rolling blackouts are certainly possible.
During tightest conditions & slowest winds (June 15 afternoon), over half of outages were from Comanche Peak nuclear, Limestone coal, Barney Davis gas, Parish coal & gas, Kiamichi gas, & Antelope Elk gas. Limestone, Davis, & Parish failed in February too. mis.ercot.com/public/data-pr…
Governor Abbott’s letter to the PUC will actually make Texas electricity costlier and less reliable, while skewing the playing field to favor aging thermal power plants over new renewables. Here’s why… 🧵 texastribune.org/2021/07/06/tex…
1. Abbott wants subsidies for development & maintenance of coal, nuclear & gas plants. But no one wants to build costly new coal & nuclear. Better maintenance is indeed needed as thermal plants suffer 3x expected outages; that’s a cost of doing business, not cause for subsidies.
2. Abbott also asks PUC to impose new costs on wind and solar. But those are what developers want to build because they’re the cheapest and cleanest options, and corporate consumers are increasingly demanding clean electricity.
ERCOT debuted "extreme scenarios" in its summer SARA, but downplayed them without justification as "1-in-100" events. In fact, power plant outages are double their worst case and wind output low. Solar has saved us this week, but the grid seems unready for an August heat wave.
So far, demand hasn't topped 70 GW (and fortunately stayed below forecasts today), but it could reach 80 GW in an August heat wave. We'll need most power plants back online and perhaps a few new solar farms to handle that.
Article leads with two companies that went bust, before eventually noting that DOE loan guarantees netted a $2B profit, funded Tesla and other successes, and brought down the costs of solar, wind, and EVs. Sounds like a success to me. nytimes.com/2021/03/29/cli…
So Obama’s program netted $2B, helped turn wind and solar into thriving industries, boosted Tesla and EVs, and created jobs, but it's called "not particularly effective?” Sounds like a success worth emulating, rather than focusing on “Solyndra syndrome” yet again.
So the bill “didn’t have a big impact,” but it made it “cheaper to reduce emissions,” “created political support for doing so,” and “gave a jolt to EV manufacturing”?? Sounds like Dems are right to “go bigger — much bigger,” rather than get hung up on “Solyndra syndrome.”
So many of the misleading narratives about the #TexasBlackout are missing a fundamental understanding of our electric power supply, and its mutual vulnerabilities with our gas systems. We're facing an _energy systems_ crisis, not just an electricity crisis.
To understand why, we can begin by seeing how ERCOT generates power on average. Nearly half is from gas. Wind topped coal last year for the first time. We have just 4 nuclear units, little hydro, and solar soaring from a small base.
That supply provides power for most but not all of the state. And the grid is contained within Texas, with very little transmission linking to the rest of the country or Mexico. So what happens in Texas, stays in Texas.