Was beating children for speaking their Native languages also part of the soul-saving process, or was that just limited to all of the murder and negligent homicide? theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-m…
Quick fact-check, here, as I try to suppress my nausea:
In 2021, I believe 3 sites have been discovered. At 1, 215 bodies of *children* have been found. At the 2 others, 751 & 182 bodies have been found, respectively, & could be a mixture of both children and adults.
Previously, a report in 2015 identified 3,200 Native children who had died at "residential schools" (concentration camps). reuters.com/world/americas…
Next, even if you buy into the revolting idea that Catholics were "helping" the "pagans" by burying them & bringing them closer to God, you're gonna have to account for the fact that the graves were unmarked, no records were kept, & the children were *missing* from their families
I'm not a Catholic, but my impression is that burial tradition involves marking the gave. I'd love to hear an explanation for the unmarked graves if the church was truly trying to do right by these "pagan" children. Would also love to know why their names weren't written anywhere
No, you're not discounting them. You're celebrating them.
"First Nations tykes"
Was the child molestation of Catholic children all over the world also actually a blessing b/c they got to be baptized & receive communion? What about the rape & murder of nuns in Ireland? Or what about all the babies & kids who were murdered *by* nuns?
Also good things?
Or do we only consider that
"child torture" + "murder" + "unmarked grave" + BAPTISM! is a soul saving exercise for Native children?
or, sorry, "First Nation tykes"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Harrison has disputed an account involving him in Tapper's book. When interviewing Tapper, @ezraklein immediately assumes Tapper's position, before going on to explain Harrison's account is driven by blind loyalty. Why is @ezraklein in any position to mediate the truth, here?
This approach from @ezraklein flies in the face of regular journalistic practice. The account involving Harrison is anonymously sourced. On a very basic level, Harrison's own version should be given greater evidentiary weight than the anonymous source's.
@ezraklein That is the first problem. But then the issue becomes even more severe. Klein first assumes Harrison is not only wrong, but intentionally dishonest. Klein then seeks to explain this "dishonesty" through infering some other motivation on Harrison's part.
The white men are playing their parlor games again.
We've gone through so many iterations of "I'm not racist; Here is an example of the one Black person I like" and "I'm not sexist; Here is an example of a different woman I like," that I just had to roll my eyes w/ Rice. Don't have issues w/ her; It's that the REACHING is obvious
Also, I love Cory Booker. Do not wish to criticize the man. But anyone who has watched Booker vs. Harris speak--whether in Senate testimonial sessions or on the campaign trail--& judges Booker as the more "deft" either doesn't speak English or is blinded by some other variable.
Take healthy steps to protect yourself today. If you are a good person, there are other people out there who are getting high on hurting you & others. They seem to be confusing cruelty w/ not just moral virtue, but political acumen. They don't deserve the pain of good people.
For those who are making the above mistakes: You are on a bad path. No one is immune to the psycho-social effects of social media. Some of the cruel people are random to me; Others are people I've been aware of for years. I've seen new hives created. I've seen the radicalization
Being cruel on the internet doesn't make you savvier. It doesn't make you more interesting. It makes you like 95% of the people on the internet. People who have found that keyboard-enforced-social distance gives a thrilling freedom to some darker adolescent forces inside them.
Something I will be clear about: I am light-years more qualified to be commenting on Biden's "cognitive state" than others who opine. I was a researcher in Vanderbilt Medical School's Department of Hearing & Speech Sciences. I am an "expert" in Communication Science & Disorders.
The conversation as it is happening now offends me on a personal level. It offends me on a tactical level. It also offends me on a personal level. These offenses increase the more I & others are gaslit into being the less objective folks in the conversation.
I dropped out of HS. I then went to a community college for English. After that, I went to Grad School, where I taught more than a dozen sections of Ling. 101, won the college-wide Grad teaching award, & presented my thesis @ the Global French Linguistics conference. I got my MA.
The people asserting that Biden had "cognitive decline" have the burden of proof; let's be clear about this. I am often accused of being a "Biden loyalist"--and I do love the man--but that's not what this is about. It's about *simple* truths in a time where truth is shredded.
It is very important to me, as a person who cares about truth, particularly in an era of fascism, which is also an era where previously shared premises are being shredded. We have to defend the truth. We have to stick by evidence.
We are allowing fog & shadows, anonymous reports, "evidence" that is contrary to our own perception, rule the day. It has to stop.
Dems are doing "The Beaver." Party-flagellation is as innate as walking for some; combine that w/ addiction to social media conflict, which can only be fed thru intra-party conflict, & now we have a New Problem, conjured from wholecloth & Streisand-effected to the f*cking moon.
"The Beaver," from @agraybee absolutely needs to be incorporated into the social media lexicon, à la "Waffles."
@agraybee There is no need for any of this. Two journalists are coming out with a book. From what we've read so far, it doesn't seem like a very good one. There's no new evidence of "cognitive decline." Biden did drop out. There is no reason for any Democrat to participate in *any* of this