Was beating children for speaking their Native languages also part of the soul-saving process, or was that just limited to all of the murder and negligent homicide? theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-m…
Quick fact-check, here, as I try to suppress my nausea:
In 2021, I believe 3 sites have been discovered. At 1, 215 bodies of *children* have been found. At the 2 others, 751 & 182 bodies have been found, respectively, & could be a mixture of both children and adults.
Previously, a report in 2015 identified 3,200 Native children who had died at "residential schools" (concentration camps). reuters.com/world/americas…
Next, even if you buy into the revolting idea that Catholics were "helping" the "pagans" by burying them & bringing them closer to God, you're gonna have to account for the fact that the graves were unmarked, no records were kept, & the children were *missing* from their families
I'm not a Catholic, but my impression is that burial tradition involves marking the gave. I'd love to hear an explanation for the unmarked graves if the church was truly trying to do right by these "pagan" children. Would also love to know why their names weren't written anywhere
No, you're not discounting them. You're celebrating them.
"First Nations tykes"
Was the child molestation of Catholic children all over the world also actually a blessing b/c they got to be baptized & receive communion? What about the rape & murder of nuns in Ireland? Or what about all the babies & kids who were murdered *by* nuns?
Also good things?
Or do we only consider that
"child torture" + "murder" + "unmarked grave" + BAPTISM! is a soul saving exercise for Native children?
or, sorry, "First Nation tykes"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Arab peoples in Gaza and the West Bank are not more indigenous to the area than the Jewish people of that same region. This isn't a commentary on gov't policy. (The Settlers are bad). I just don't know why we accept "indigenity" as a truthful premise when it's not one.
People who practiced Judaism were in that region before people who practiced Christianity and both those people were there before the practice of Islam. This is a factual timeline. It should not be disputed. Or morally-repurposed. It's just what the timeline is.
I am getting more and more frustrated by the levels of untruth we accept. For apparently "moral" (?) reasons. Why do we accept "The indigenous people of Palestine" as a description in opposition to Jewish populations when that is just clearly false?
It is fundamentally quite irritating that we allow anyone associated with "The Young Turks" lecture us about nation states or genocide. "Oh, I was UNAWARE of what The Young Turks did." If you were, why are you talking about Sykes-Picot & state-building in post-Ottoman lands?
If you were so naïve as to what the Young Turks did, why should we listen to you about Israel or anything else in the post-Ottoman world? Why, in particular, should we be forced to endure your rants about genocide?
You're either a naïf who knows NOTHING about the Young Turks--and therefore literally nothing about genocide--or you actively chose to name your platform after the people who inspired Raphael Lemkin to coin the word "genocide."
In 2016, HRC said something along the lines of "My personal opinions are often different (more progressive) than my public opinions" & people acted like she'd just revealed herself to be Beelzebub. HRC wasn't alone in that approach. Dems acted w/ this separation for decades.
Joe Biden changed history on LGBTQ rights not because his opinion diverged that much from mainstream center-left Democrats *but* because he blurted out what many already believed: gay marriage was good. This worked out well for us. The time was right.
Somewhere along the line, this approach changed. HRC's "separation" of personal from political was pilloried. Bernie & his acolytes shifted the party "left"--including, in 2019-20 on social issues that Bernie himself didn't even really care about. Everything became a purity test.
I really do think we are in a dangerous moment in terms of antisemitism. Yes, already dangerous. But a # of factors that are interacting & I think it will get worse. Dems aren't the only social force responsible for this, but they do need to get better on the issue as a group.
I've talked about the rise of antisemitism in the U.S. quite a bit. I'm not trying to address that rise, now, specifically, though it is a constant. I am trying to identify a new specific danger with which the "rise" interacts.
The U.S. rightwing is having a discussion centered around Nick Fuentes and antisemitism. The US leftwing (broadly construed) is not speaking up, partially because we have antisemitism problems in our own ranks. There's weakness on all fronts. Nick Fuentes will probably succeed.
Maybe it's 2 years of being told I love genocide, or maybe it's the fact that my ex- called Ted Kaszinski "Uncle Ted," endlessly ranted about ecoanarchism, & also orchestrated 2 false arrests & one 302 after beating me. Either way! Done w/ psychopaths masquerading as "Leftists."
Like this is why "Leftists" on this website have no power over me, lol. Do you know how many monologues about Luigi Mangione I've had to listen to? Like, can you even imagine being like, "If I don't nod along to this Luigi Mangione rhapsody I MIGHT GET BEATEN AND THEN ARRESTED?"
Hasan Piker is the EXACT SAME MAN. I can't barely handle it. Well, maybe he doesn't call the Unabomber "Uncle Ted" & perhaps he hasn't already beaten up a woman but the energy is there. Also why would I take "Leftists" on here seriously ever again? Or anywhere?
John Thune is nervous. He just spread a bunch of lies on @pbsnewshour but I noticed one thing in particular: He reassured the audience that the underlying structure of ACA would be intact. He's lying. But I don't think I've heard a Repub make a promise about ACA like that before.
Maybe it's happened & I just haven't noticed it. If you have, we should pinpoint the time when they shifted from full-frontal ACA attack to "Don't worry about the baseline of ACA." That's a shift. It's either new or it happened & we didn't notice. Either way. . . .
Republican Senate Majority leader reassuring the public re: the "basics of ACA" (& his reassurances are lies) is interesting. Particularly in the midst of a government shutdown w/ some role reversals occurring. Signals need for defense of ACA; possible weakness.