Was beating children for speaking their Native languages also part of the soul-saving process, or was that just limited to all of the murder and negligent homicide? theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-m…
Quick fact-check, here, as I try to suppress my nausea:
In 2021, I believe 3 sites have been discovered. At 1, 215 bodies of *children* have been found. At the 2 others, 751 & 182 bodies have been found, respectively, & could be a mixture of both children and adults.
Previously, a report in 2015 identified 3,200 Native children who had died at "residential schools" (concentration camps). reuters.com/world/americas…
Next, even if you buy into the revolting idea that Catholics were "helping" the "pagans" by burying them & bringing them closer to God, you're gonna have to account for the fact that the graves were unmarked, no records were kept, & the children were *missing* from their families
I'm not a Catholic, but my impression is that burial tradition involves marking the gave. I'd love to hear an explanation for the unmarked graves if the church was truly trying to do right by these "pagan" children. Would also love to know why their names weren't written anywhere
No, you're not discounting them. You're celebrating them.
"First Nations tykes"
Was the child molestation of Catholic children all over the world also actually a blessing b/c they got to be baptized & receive communion? What about the rape & murder of nuns in Ireland? Or what about all the babies & kids who were murdered *by* nuns?
Also good things?
Or do we only consider that
"child torture" + "murder" + "unmarked grave" + BAPTISM! is a soul saving exercise for Native children?
or, sorry, "First Nation tykes"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
-False
-Grotesque
-Yes, "blood libel"
-Will reduce the salience of actual mistreatment Palestinians or anyone else might face in any military/state custody
The "maximally evil Israel" lies protect no one; hurt many
The entire Israel/Palestine conversation is just drenched in maximalist characterizations & lies, thus removing accountability from *everyone*. Israelis are dehumanized as monsters. The malfeasant far-right gov't denies the extremist lies & then the actual truth never gets told.
If you want to hold Netanyahu & his far-right government accountable, you should tell the truth. But people are too interested in grotesque Blood Libel to do this. So we end up with a polarized spectrum between total dehumanization & total denial of any wrong-doing.
"Did Platner know it was a Totenkopf? And, if yes, did he therefore lie in 2025 when he said he had no idea?"
Most surely: Yes & yes.
Apparently there was a whole thing re: Marine Scout/Snipers ("SS") getting SS (Nazi Tattoos). This story broke in 2012. It was a military scandal.
Then, in June, 2020, Platner got in a long debate on reddit about Marines and SS insignia, related to the previous scandal. This is all publicly accessible.
Others on the same reddit thread, including at least one self-identified Marine, argued whether or not SS insignia is bad and/or, within the Marine Corps, signals Nazi ideology. The Marine who argued YES, it does signal Naziism, wrote:
"The US Marine Corps DOES NOT TOLERATE NAZI SYMBOLISM... The Commandant of the Marine Corps gave orders to stop it, issued an apology, and ordered an investigation."
Separately, Platner, who had a Totenkopf on his chest, argued the opposite, while invoking Black Marines.
Specifically, a user named SP4CEM4N_SPIFF wrote "I remember this being exposed nearly a decade ago. It's like people claiming the confederate flag isn't about hate," to which Platner replied: "I will be sure to inform the black guys I know with bolts that they're Nazis now and not USMC Scout/Snipers."
Here, Platner is directly making the connection between SS tattoos & their intentional use by U.S. Marines (which was previously a scandal), while also doing kind of a "Black person human shield" thing. Note, again, others in the thread are really disgusted by the use of SS insignia & support the military taking strict action.
The original thread was about Zachary Sanns, a former Marine who was arrested for impersonating a federal officer at a Las Vegas BLM protest while armed and bearing SS tattoos.
Platner was not Scout/Snipers. He was a machine-gun operator. With a Totenkopf. And he recently told everyone, including those in the Democratic Party who support him, that he had no idea what the symbol meant.
I think the most galling thing, for me, to read, is that Platner argues with the guy who says "it's like saying the Confederate Flag isn't about hate."
It's galling because the guy with the confederate flag comment is right. It's also galling because now we know, for sure, in 2026, that Platner has been through this whole conversation--does your Nazi tattoo mean you're a Nazi?--before. And he's acting completely ignorant of it.
This comment in the thread is, I think, quite relevant.
We're being lied to. SS Lighting Bolts on Marines was a controversy in 2012. Platner commented about it in 2020. Other marines in the comments had strong feelings, as well. cbsnews.com/news/panetta-t…
The "should Democrats embrace Hasan Piker" question has been well-answered by now, but this new pathetic twist is that GOP media was all pre-emptively keyed up to respond to us "embracing Hasan Piker," which we outright refused to do. Looks like we did good, fellow Dems.
Now take this lesson and move on from the human tinker toy and focus your sites on the corpse-desecrating-rape-denying-Nazi-tattoo-wielding little psychopath from Maine. It's gonna be the same thing. You know it will be.
The GOP was sooooo ready for "Democrats to go on Piker." And so many people just lapped it up. Lucky thing we didn't fall for it. So look alive. They're gonna hammer us with Platner. You know they will.
I asked "Claude" to fact-check 2 claims for me: 1) That the Michigan Synagogue attacker was inspired by Hezbollah & 2) That the attacker aimed to murder Jewish children. The ChatBot answered #1 correctly; #2 incorrectly. I queried it & asked it to describe its errors. Please read
I experiment with AI all the time. I ask it to fact-check, but often find myself having to correct it. It is based on statistical frequencies in input. If input contains flawed majority frames, that's what the AI spits out. This has real consequences, esp. for knowledge-building.
The statistics the AI gets for its "knowledge" mirror human stats. If a false narrative gets pushed enough--or, in the case of intent to murder Jewish children, a flawed evidentiary standard gets pushed--it will get repeated in the AI output. This is what users will "learn" from.
I had a court victory today. My abusive ex was concealing income from his ex-wife, the bio mom of my stepchildren, whom he abused as well. I gave her a detailed account of his income, from my time w/ him. Today she obtained more child support for her children, my stepchildren.
Few people ever seem to understand just how much you can love children who are not biologically your own. I would have done--and would do--anything for my stepchildren. There was a point at which I realized I could not do anything to legally protect them. But their bio mom could.
I realized if I truly loved my stepkids, if I truly wanted to be a parent to them, a protector of them, I had to give every piece of info I had to their bio mom. About abuse. About dentist appointments. About income. I didn't have legal power. I had no power. But I did have info.
I really want strategists to start thinking about how THEY feel when the topic of Israel/Palestine comes up. I'm not talking about frothy antisemites. I'm talking about Normies. You're at Happy Hour w/ friends from work. Someone says, "Let's talk about ISRAEL." How do you feel?
Personally, I would think "Oh fuck. I'm about to lose some friends." I can't even talk about Israel/Palestine WITH MY PARENTS and I think we're almost 95% in agreement. Not an issue I would want to push to the forefront of my electoral politics.
I'm dating a man right now who's really great and I said we could not talk about Israel/Palestine several times over the course of several weeks. Then finally, I agreed to talk about it & . . . we 1) got into a fight & 2) I found myself pulling up newspaper clips from 1948.