Drew Holden Profile picture
Jul 8, 2021 26 tweets 19 min read Read on X
🧵THREAD🧵

The downfall of Michael Avenatti was obvious many miles away. Well, to everyone except the mainstream media.

With the news of Avenatti’s sentencing, I thought it was time to go down memory lane for some of the best Avenatti takes. ⤵️
We need to start this with some of the all-time greats.

Perhaps my favorite comes from @ChrisCillizza.
Now I say perhaps because these two takes from @JoyAnnReid should be etched into stone for the rest of human history.
But maybe the all-time best comes from - who else - @JRubinBlogger, who politely asked Avenatti to consider running for Congress before running for President (“I love ya, but…”)
But don’t be fooled. This wasn’t just the fangirling daydreams of a few chatty media types.

We had countless stories just like this one from @NBCNews that helped build Avenatti into a folk icon.

They have…not aged perfectly.
There were a lot of takes about how brilliant Avenatti was, so well positioned to strike at Trump, so likely to be his undoing.

This from @latimes captures the sentiment well. “Trump meets his match”
I’m…not confident this should be the takeaway, @JuliaDavisNews.
For @USATODAY, Avenatti had “cornered” the President and his team (this was around impeachment - Avenatti repeatedly said Trump wouldn’t serve out his term)
Some of the framing was…a little much.

Here, @frankrichny for @NYMag says that, despite the criticism, Avenatti is “the one media whore I can’t get enough of”
There were loving profiles in places like @nytimes.

(That also includes glowing actual coverage about Avenatti and, as we’ll get to soon, his future ambitions).
But it wasn’t just the Times who profiled him. Here’s @NPR which, as a reminder, gets a cut of your tax dollars, doing the same.
And of course the media hung on every twist and turn of the Avenatti saga.

Who can forget the fawning coverage of his presidential ambitions?

I’m not sure the idea that “Michael Avenatti’s Past Won’t Stop Him” - running for President or otherwise - has held up @TIME.
Who can forget this classic chyron from @brianstelter @ReliableSources
But @CNN pushed Avenatti hard even beyond just Stelter.

Although I will say, having Avenatti on to talk about “the news media’s credulity” is a little too on the nose, @brianstelter

Take a look: @ChrisCuomo @Acosta
This from @Slate presented without comment.
But the worst outlet had to be @MSNBC. Avenatti was a regular fixture on the outlet. They all but played comms director for him, even covering his Twitter spats with President Trump.

@maddow helped push some serious propaganda. And @AriMelber I…I don’t know what to tell you.
A few predictions & other commentary on the network haven’t exactly aged perfectly.

@JoeNBC, might you have preferred your original skepticism?

And @JonathanTurley, do you still stand by the idea that “the Michael I know would not make any allegations that he couldn’t back up”?
Some of the coverage was paparazzi-esque.

Avenatti was a media creation. And they squeezed every ounce out of him that they could - even in weird ways. @washingtonpost @Eugene_Scott @VanityFair
Again, the coverage was weird. But I think I will - in this case and in all others - dispute the suggestion that “CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin is America” @washingtonpost @AlexHortonTX
As @FreeBeacon wrote about, just @CNN and @MSNBC gave Avenatti nearly *$200 million* in free airtime in a two month window: freebeacon.com/politics/cnn-m…
A lot of reporters were obviously star struck with Avenatti - who will be spending 30 months behind bars for attempted extortion.

That includes @NicolleDWallace (I don’t think the teaching gig will happen), @chucktodd (maybe pushback would’ve been warranted?) & @atrupar
Some of the blue check takes were really…something.

@SteveSchmidtSES (“clairvoyant”)
@ananavarro (not sure this comparison held up!)
@funder
@kurteichenwald (yikes man)
There should be an enormous lesson here: the media is incredibly vulnerable to a certain variety of camera-savvy huckster who tells them what they want to hear.

The media was the mark, and boy did they get taken by Michael Avenatti.
The question now becomes: will anyone learn anything?

Alas, my hunch is no. No one has faced consequences from promoting and fawning over the fraud of Avenatti. Avenatti was good for business. And we’ll see more like him in no time.
Avenatti is the apotheosis of a character that’s been all-too-common in the Trump era: a thinly veiled fraud whom the media push because they say mean things about a Republican.

If the media hopes to build any trust with the American people, they need to stop creating Avenattis.
With the pandemic in the rearview mirror, it can be easy to forget the destruction that it caused.

Food banks have been hit hard. In your charity, if you liked the thread, a donation to Capital Area Food Bank would go a long way. capitalareafoodbank.org

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
🧵Thread🧵

Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.

Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.

Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.

That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…Image
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.

I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.

The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.

An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 20
🧵Thread🧵

Do you remember the media meltdown over Trump’s pardons? As Biden hands out decades-long passes to his family and friends, that concern is nowhere to be seen.

Biden no doubt wants you to forget this outrage in the glow of the inaugural.

Don’t. Screenshots help. ⤵️
When Trump announced pardons late in his first term, @nytimes said it “showed his willingness to use his power aggressively on behalf of loyalists” to “override courts, juries and prosecutors to apply his own standard of justice for his allies.” Image
Image
When Biden did the same thing, @nytimes said he was using his “power to protect people targeted by…Trump” to “head off politically driven prosecutions.”

A little different, huh? Image
Image
Read 28 tweets
Jan 14
To commemorate this tragic news, a quick 🧵thread 🧵of some of my favorite Jennifer Rubin tweets.

She will be missed. See why. ⤵️
My favorite: Andrew Cuomo defender and reply guy Rubin.

These are real tweets. She’s commenting on the spaghetti. Image
Image
Image
Hard to square the circle here, in retrospect. Image
Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(