Great comments from @AlecMuffett here. ID companies are lobbing UK gov to introduce phrenology as an identifier for internet access. Yes, that means using the webcam to measure your head to determine that you are a precious British child. #SunlitUplands theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Incidentally, one of the companies promoted in this article is participating in the ICO's regulatory sandbox, e.g. developing along the very edge of privacy law.
But as you know, UK gov is preparing to deregulate pesky privacy law in favour of "innovation".
Follow that thought.
See how I said "precious British child" there? That's not hyperbole. We’ve also seen verification providers lobbying government to require not just age, not just ID, but *nationality* verification as requirements for internet access.

What, as they say, could possibly go wrong.
We'll have more to say on this during the work week, but in the meantime, please make sure you join us and that your company supports us too. We have a fight on our hands. They have corporate budgets. openrightsgroup.org/join

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heather Burns

Heather Burns Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WebDevLaw

12 May
🧵You're going to read a lot today about the government's plans for the Online Safety Bill on #onlineharms, a regulatory process which has eaten up much of the past two years of my professional work. I suppose if I had a hot take to offer after two years, it's this:
1) If you see the bill being presented as being about "social media" "tech giants" "big tech" etc, that's bullshit. It impacts *all services of all sizes, based in the UK or not. Even yours.* Bonus: take a drink every time a journo or MP says the law is about reining in Facebook.
2) If you see the Bill being presented as being about children's safety, that's bullshit. It's about government compelling private companies to police the legal speech and behaviour of everyone who says or does anything online. Children are being exploited here as the excuse.
Read 10 tweets
29 Apr
It's taken less than three weeks for India to go from this to taking down posts critical of the government in a national emergency. Think that couldn't happen here too?
We, and other groups, have been very clear on how the UK's plans would hand a gift to authoritarian regimes. One MP's response to that, last week, in a Parliament committee: to hell with other countries. "Chi Onwurah: I would. I want to touch briefly on a rea
So to recap, the British Internet for British People should set a "world-leading" example for other nations to follow, up to the point where other nations use our model to justify their authoritarianism, at which point we wash our hands of our "world-leading" influence.
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
I know we talk a lot lately about the UK's assault on e2e encryption, and it may seem a bit over the top, but it's important to understand what's on the table, and what policymakers are being told. Here a thread about e2e in the #onlineharms context.
It centres on a report released last month by the Centre for Social Justice, and endorsed by the former Home Secretary, Sajid Javid. Folks in power read these reports and follow their recommendations. Have a look at page 52. centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
It calls for, as we've warned was likely, the use of e2e encryption to qualify as a violation of the "duty of care" in the Online Safety Bill. They note: "It will be insufficient for a platform to argue that introducing such a high-risk design feature will have benefits in other
Read 9 tweets
16 Jul 20
For years, the US has defiantly refused to reform its surveillance powers, or implement a Federal-level privacy law which respects privacy as a human right and safeguards the data of non-Americans. The CJEU has just ruled that enough is enough.
Today's ruling could have had implications for the Brexit transition, had SCCs been invalidated. That part remains. The ruling is, however, a warning shot to the UK's process of securing an adequacy decision. We are a Five Eyes ally with domestic surveillance issues of our own.
The UK, as I've said for years, was barely an adequate country in terms of domestic surveillance while *within* the EU. To secure adequacy, the UK's privacy practices will need to be better outside the EU than they were in it. Where does this go next? Trade deals.
Read 12 tweets
26 Dec 19
Um, yes, yhat's exactly how trade deals work. For the 1,000th time: the UK cannot have a data adequacy agreement until it is a third country outside the EU, not before; and because of surveillance & human rights issues there's no way in hell we'll get one.
thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/b…
Watch out for a lot of this: journalism painting the lack of a adequacy agreement as EU intransigence, when it's entirely the UK demanding the entitlement to remain a member of a club it's leaving without the club's rules applying to it.
One more time for the intransigents.
afterbrexit.tech/data-protectio…
Read 4 tweets
24 Apr 18
Watching @UKHouseofLords Comms committee hearing on internet regulation - tweetings may follow.
parliament.uk/business/commi…
There is no means of independently auditing social media companies' self-regulation - co-regulation may be the way forward. Focus tends to be quantitative (how many offensive posts taken down) than qualitative (how many takedown requests were accurate.)
Over-reliance on criminal mechanisms e.g. twitter joke trial - should we be looking at less intrusive regualtion as in self-regulation or something more industry driven like ASA, BBFC.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(