AllThingsVentured Profile picture
Jul 11, 2021 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Even with the very weak current IMO regulations, UNCTAD expects the fleet to slow by 6.7% this decade. An extra ~1% of new ship capacity per year will be needed to offset in addition to ~2% per year to replace old ships. Compare this to a #drybulk orderbook of just 5.6% today. Image
#Drybulk demand grew at a CAGR of 4.7% per year since China was admitted to the WTO. Even if this slows SIGNIFICANTLY to 2.5%, this means to maintain the very tight supply/demand balance we see today, we will need 5%+ of new ship capacity to deliver each year this decade. Image
In DWT (capacity terms) this 5%+ per year of new ships needed is equivalent to ~50M DWT. This is more ship capacity than has been built in each of the past 8 years. Although not a problem in isolation, shipyards are already full through 2023 ships from other fast growing sectors Image
Over the same 8 year period shipbuilding capacity has actually been contracting and expected to contract further. All other sectors will need the same extra ~1% of new capacity per year to offset slow steaming and shipbuilding capacity is already sold out before this effect. Image
With shipbuilding capacity for large ships sold out through 2023 despite one of the lowest cross-sector orderbooks in history on a percentage basis of the global fleet, it is clear that shipbuilding capacity will be grossly insufficient by 2024. Image
Despite persistently high rates in the last cycle starting in 2003, it took many years to build enough shipbuilding capacity and then many more years to build enough ships to meet demand leading to a 7 year period of very high #drybulk shipping profits. Image
Although every cycle is different and this is NOT the last cycle, many of the same forces are at work. I expect an extended period of high profitability as forces constraining supply will cause supply to consistently lag demand making shipping a top performer in the coming years.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AllThingsVentured

AllThingsVentured Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AllVentured

Mar 21
Shipping cheat codes:

In a shipping bull market, you want to own big ships.

In a shipping bear market, don't own shipping.

In neither scenario should you own small tankers.
Large crude tankers fetch much higher rates and margins in a tight market and fall back to the same near breakeven levels in a bear market.

Hydrocarbon trades (regardless of clean/dirty) are super fungible over any time period more than the next couple months. If profits in one size get out of whack, the WILL be quickly cannibalized by other ship sizes into a more typical $/ton distribution.

Read 4 tweets
Mar 19
1/ FINALLY some good data on US port calls vs Chinese fleet proportion regarding the proposed Chinese ship fees.

🧵TLDR: Most shipping trades will easily find non-Chinese tonnage to call US ports to avoid the fees

h/t Omar/Jefferies the first reasonable take vs the hysterics Image
2/ Here are the ratios of non-Chinese fleet to US share of global trade to show how many times over US trade is covered for each segment by the non-Chinese fleet:

Drybulk - .5/.075 = 6.7x
LNG - .9/.2 = 4.5x
Boxships - .6/.15 = 4x
Tankers - .7/.18 = 3.9x
LPG - .85/.45 = 1.9x
3/ Thats not to say there won't be disruption and extra costs. THERE WILL BE. Just not nearly to the hysterical estimates I keep seeing from shipping analysts and the liner company CEOs talking their book and threatening huge reductions in port calls. Not going to happen.
Read 13 tweets
Dec 5, 2024
The main reason #tanker rates and equities have sold off from their June highs?

➡️Huge global inventory drawdowns⬅️

The 150mm bbl drawdown since early June represents 30 VLCC equivalents that went unemployed vs a flat inventory counterfactual.

thread 🧵
2/ With inventories at bottom of 5 year averages, it seems unlikely that inventories decline meaningfully from here. Just returning to flat inventories adds back the +30 VLCCs of demand. Adding the expected 1mm b/d supply/demand growth in 2025 requires another +30 VLCCs.
3/ Therefore my base case for 2025 sees +60 VLCC equivalents employed vs levels seen since June.

This is vs a fleet of ~900 VLCCS so +7% utilization relative to recent months.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 8, 2024
1/ Buried under all of the Middle East and port strike chaos headlines, a very important debate about a carbon tax on shipping is ongoing at IMO meetings this week.

ft.com/content/407307…
2/ Support for a carbon tax is gathering momentum as it would be one of the most simple, economic, and effective ways to lower carbon emissions in the shipping industry. On the other side of the debate are middle income countries responsible for the lion's share of world trade
3/ These major exporters oppose it because it will increase the cost of traded goods which is partially borne by the producer and partially borne by the consumer. Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 23, 2024
🚨 Breaking 🚨

Biden Admin sanctions 147 vessel Sovcomflot fleet as foretold in the below thread.

A nice gift on a Friday. If history is a guide and we can use COSCO sanctions as a proxy, Tanker longs should do exceptionally well next week.
Image
These sanctions actually DO work.

What few vessels the US has sanctioned due to Russian oil prior to Sovcomflot have been mostly stranded due to the sanctions.
Image
Image
I never trade after hours but felt compelled to today. Picked up a good chunk of $IMPP (had already been buying this dip earlier this week) and $TNK at fair prices. Tried for some $TNP as well but only got a bit.

I count 42x aframax and 15x suezmax in the sovcomflot fleet. If all of these are sidelined, I expect midsize rates to benefit the most which is why I bought the above. $NAT also a good option but already bid up much higher after hours.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 9, 2023
1/ Just like with the Russia/Ukraine conflict #tankers are likely to be the #1 beneficiary of renewed enforcement on Iran oil sanctions and associated changing trade patterns 🧵:

2/ The Biden Admin is in a tough spot. If Iran orchestrated the latest conflict in Israel, they will have to respond. How to do this without impacting oil prices? After all, turning a blind eye to existing sanctions has allowed Iran to increase exports by a huge ~500kb/d over the past year keeping a lid on prices.
Image
3/ Just like Russia/Ukraine, the strategic objective of the Biden admin will be to keep the oil flowing but limit the economic benefit gained from it by Russia/Iran as attempted with the price cap. Now that we know that price caps don’t work, what better way to do this than to drive up the cost to ship it?

Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(