If you read the article, you'll know the Brazilian guy in question committed suicide.
So in what world is this in any way newsworthy?
Only if it can be used to pump up fears against China and its vaccine.
The US Dept of Health and Human Services' latest report says that one of its key achievements of 2020 was persuading Brazil not to buy the Russian vaccine.
Brazil has lost more than 500k people to COVID and has barely vaccinated anyone as a result.
As this Guardian article implies, Western nations would rather millions more in the Global South died than China or Russia save their lives.
Thus, I actually don't think the anti-vax stuff is simply irresponsible journalism; I think it is something much darker.
Considering what we've seen already, these headlines are pretty sus as well.
If you're unaware, leaked gov documents show that Reuters was covertly working with the UK government to "weaken Russia." So a similar deal against China is not implausible.
In March 2025, Trump carried out a premeditated attack on the Al Rasool Al-Azam Oncology Hospital in Saada, Yemen, turning it into rubble. At least two people were killed and 13 more injured.
This was not an isolated incident. Eight days previously, on March 16, Washington launched 13 separate airstrikes against the building, systematically destroying the hospital’s five blocks.
The Anti-Cancer Fund, a local government medical organization, described the events as a clear “war crime.”
Syria 🇸🇾 In 2017, on Trump's orders, US forces repeatedly bombed the National Hospital in Raqqa, carrying out 20 separate attacks against the building, including using white phosphorous munitions.
A highly controversial and widely-banned weapon, white phosphorous instantly ignites upon contact with oxygen, sticks to clothes and skin, and burns at an extremely high temperature. It cannot be extinguished by water, leaving those affected to suffer excruciating – and deadly – injuries.
At least 30 civilians were killed, some likely due to the effects of the white phosphorous, which causes respiratory damage and organ failure.
Alert🚨: New Epstein email I found shows renowned academic Noam Chomsky telling Epstein that he is “fantasizing about” Little St. James Island.
(I'm digging through the Epstein Files for Chomsky's connections to the disgraced pedophile. Check my timeline/follow for more drops.)
Noam Chomsky participates in Jeffrey Epstein's birthday, even contributing a note for a "birthday booklet" -- which sounds very similar to the infamous 2003 one Trump wrote a poem for.
"I am very enthusiastic about these meetings" with a convicted sex trafficker, Noam Chomsky's wife says, about the pair meeting up in Boston.
This is one of the most extraordinary and illuminating passages in all journalism.
CNN frames Maduro as a paranoid liar for claiming the CIA is trying to overthrow him.
Yet in the very next sentence, it casually notes that the CIA did, in fact, overthrow him.
The level of cognitive dissonance and imperial brain rot you must have to write this, and then have it read by an editor and published, is truly breathtaking.
In Western media, the US government is always presented as a force for good, even when it is attempting regime change ops.
Meanwhile, the idea that the CIA might be trying to overthrow foreign governments, when considered at all, is presented as a ludicrous accusation from a "dictator" that they've been defaming for years, as my academic paper explored.
As @ryangrim pointed out, there is ample concrete evidence that the CIA and US government have been trying over overthrow Maduro for years.
Multiple books from cabinet members have confirmed that the CIA was carrying out terror operations in Venezuela during Trump's first term, and John Bolton's book all-but-confesses that the US government was behind the 2018 assassination attempt against Maduro.
And in 2020, a CIA agent was caught outside Venezuela's largest oil refinery carrying explosives.
You probably haven't heard about this, because it was completely ignored in the Western press.
[Thread 🇻🇪🇺🇸] Discussion of the phrase "Venezuela human rights" has hit a massive all-time high, according to Google Trends.
In this thread, I'll show how that is a clear sign that a potential US military intervention is imminent.
The United States has moved around 10,000 troops to the region, as the Trump administration openly states it is trying to carry out regime change in Venezuela.
Yesterday, Trump announced he had authorized "lethal" CIA missions inside Venezuela, in order to topple President Nicolás Maduro.
Interest & use of the phrase "Libya human rights" peaked in March 2011, just hours before the US led a massive intervention in the country, overthrowing President Gaddafi, and turning North Africa's most prosperous country into a failed state, replete with open-air slave markets.
Once the operation started, Western interest in Libyan human rights fell to almost zero.