This week on my podcast, I read my latest @locusmag column, "Tech Monopolies and the Insufficient Necessity of Interoperability." It presents a theory of change to get us to a world of aggressive, trans-industry, global trustbusting.

locusmag.com/2021/07/cory-d…

1/ A mousetrap superimposed over the Matrix 'waterfall' effect.
Most industries are monopolized. Whether we're talking about athletic shoes or pharmacy benefit managers, the path to monopolization is the same: companies buy up small competitors, merge with major ones, and use their investors' cash to subsidize anticompetitive attacks.

2/
The reason they're able to get away with it is that for 40 years, the world's been in the grip of a dangerous economic delusion: that the only basis for fighting monopolies is "consumer welfare." That is, monopolies should only be considered harmful if they make prices go up.

3/
The "consumer welfare" standard originated with the far-right economics cult of the University of Chicago and was launched by Ronald Reagan, and has been supported by every president since (until Biden, whose EO from last week explicitly rejects it).

pluralistic.net/2021/07/10/unn…

4/
Reagan had incipient dementia (and was thick as pigshit even in his prime), but consumer welfare's boosters understood its consequences: by focusing solely on what monopolies did to us as "consumers," we'd remove from consideration how monopoles acted on us as CITIZENS.

5/
"Consumer welfare" was a recipe for concentrating corporate power so that it could overwhelm regulators, lawmakers and judges, creating a kind of pluocratic planned economy where how we live and work is decided in unaccountable board-rooms, not public legislatures.

6/
Lawmakers were complicit in this power-grab while it benefited them - while the campaign contributions offset the voter alienation that followed from every corporate sellout - but today, it seems, a critical mass of lawmakers have had enough.

7/
The 26-hour markup session for House Democrats' six landmark antitrust bills saw every kind of lawmaker speak out against tech monopolies - from far-right clowns like Matt Gaetz to "squad" member Pramila Jayapal, and every kind of "moderate" in between.

8/
Lawmakers are, for once, ahead of the electorate. Lots of voters are furious about some kind of monopoly - tech, health insurance, cable, beer, finance, meat packing - but precious few who understand that the problem isn't with one industry, it's with monopoly itself.

9/
To create the momentum we'll need for global, cross-industry trustbusting, we have to create and build momentum for the movement. I think we should start with tech.

Even though few people have fixing tech at the top of their agenda, NOBODY likes the tech industry.

10/
What's more, though tech companies monopolized the same way that, say pro wrestling did (spending their way to the top, buying out or crushing all rivals), tech has particular, specific characteristics that make it easier to pry apart again.

11/
You've probably heard that tech is monopolized because of "network effects." That's econ jargon for a product or service that gets more valuable as more people use it. You join Facebook because your friends are there. Once you're on FB, others join because YOU'RE there.

12/
But while network effects explain why tech GETS big, they're not why tech STAYS big. For that, you need to look at the neglected economics concept of "switching costs" - the things you give up when you stop using a product or service.

13/
Facebook and other Big Tech companies do everything they can to raise switching costs. When you quit FB, you lose access to the friends, communities and customers who stay behind. There's no technical reason this has to happen.

14/
You can switch cell carriers without losing the ability to call your friends, after all. The high cost of leaving FB was deliberately created by the company, which has used expensive lawsuits and technological countermeasures to block every attempt to interoperate with it.

15/
But if we used the law to guarantee interop, to force FB to connect to other, non-monopolistic services (say, ones run by co-ops, nonprofits or startups) then FB's billions of users wouldn't be a reason to join FB, they'd be a reason to LEAVE it.

16/
If we passed the #ACCESSAct - which imposes a duty on Facebook to interoperate with rivals that promise not to mine or commercialize data - then leaving FB would give you all the benefits of FB (community and friends), with none of the privacy costs.

pluralistic.net/2021/06/22/vap…

17/
And if we safeguarded #CompetitiveCompatibility - the right to interoperate without permission, we'd future-proof the ACCESS Act, by securing the right to mod FB to protect security, add accessibility, and add other forms of interop.

eff.org/deeplinks/2019…

18/
Fixing industry - including and especially tech - requires action from the public sector. We can't make monopolies better by acting as "consumers" - we have to act as CITIZENS.

You won't fix #SurveillanceCapitalism by buying Apple products.

onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy…

19/
For all the noise that tech companies make about their rivalries - Google vs Facebook, Apple vs Google - at bottom, they differences are as meaningless as the flavors of "marshmellows" in a box of Lucky Charms.

20/
Apple and Google are effectively a combine - for years, Google's Eric Schmidt sat on Apple's board. Apple's biggest single customer is Google. And Apple and Google had no problem illegally colluding to suppress wages with "no poach" agreements.

knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/silico…

21/
Same goes for Google-Facebook's rivalry. For two companies that are supposed to be as different as night and day, there are a fuckton of personnel who have moved from one to the other - all the way up to Sheryl Sandberg, the one-time Google VP who's now Facebook's COO.

22/
In his dissent to #CitizensUnited, Justice Stevens wrote that corporate free speech was bullshit because "corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires."

Companies want us to believe they have "values," but these are just marketing crap.

23/
That's why monopoly is so easy. Back when the DoJ killed AT&T and T-Mobile's merger, John Legere took charge of T-Mobile's and declared himself the "un-CEO," growing out his hair and donning a t-shirt and emphasizing that he was nothing like his rivals.

24/
But Legere was an ex-AT&T exec. T-Mobile's differences from the other carriers - its claim to be an "un-carrier" were as superficial as those Lucky Charm marshmellow flavors.

That's why Legere was able to merge T-Mobile with Sprint, pocket $135m and retire.

25/
If corporations really had character and personality, if corporate rivalries really meant anything, then we wouldn't have waves and waves of mergers.

26/
I mean, either Disney and Fox were completely at odds with one another and Rupert Murdoch and Bob Iger were Romeo and Juliet, whose desperate, burning love for one another united their two great houses, or...

27/
...It was all bullshit.

To the extent that corporations have "character" and "value," these boil down to one thing:

Class solidarity among monopolists.

28/
Which is why boycotts or other purchase decisions are not going to solve the monopoly problem. You're not a consumer, an ambulatory wallet who votes by buying or not buying. You're a citizen, who can and must demand action from your state on your behalf.

29/
Corporate capture isn't inevitable. It's the result of monopoly - of massive profits and concentrated decision-making power following from boiling an industry down to a few companies.

We CAN have a responsive government, but only while it is more powerful than companies.

30/
We need to bust every trust, but we have to start somewhere. Tech is uniquely suited to being that starting point, both because of the role interop can play in shattering tech's power, and because tech is the infrastructure for a mass movement to change every industry.

31/
You can read the article here:

locusmag.com/2021/07/cory-d…

Here's the podcast episode:

craphound.com/news/2021/07/1…

Here's a direct link to the MP3 (hosting courtesy of the @InternetArchive, they'll host your stuff for free, forever):

archive.org/download/Cory_…

32/
And here's the RSS feed for my podcast:

feeds.feedburner.com/doctorow_podca…

Image:
Royalty Free (modified)
flickr.com/photos/9978344…

CC BY:
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.…

eof/
ETA - If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

pluralistic.net/2021/07/12/mon…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cory Doctorow

Cory Doctorow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctorow

12 Jul
Neo Tōkyō in アキラ (AKIRA) 1988, dir. Katsuhiro Otomo. wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/656522507…アキラ-akira-1988-dir
Neo Tōkyō in アキラ (AKIRA) 1988, dir. Katsuhiro Otomo. wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/656522507…アキラ-akira-1988-dir
Neo Tōkyō in アキラ (AKIRA) 1988, dir. Katsuhiro Otomo. wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/656522507…アキラ-akira-1988-dir
Read 10 tweets
12 Jul
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Podcasting "Tech Monopolies and the Insufficient Necessity of Interoperability"; The Sacklers will get to keep billions; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2021/07/12/mon…

#Pluralistic

1/
Tomorrow, July 13, I'm doing a benefit appearance at the Project Abraham Book Club to help raise funds for Yazidi refugees in Canada. We'll be talking about my book RADICALIZED.

d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/truthmustbetol…

2/
Podcasting "Tech Monopolies and the Insufficient Necessity of Interoperability": Corporate rivalries vs public power.



3/
Read 21 tweets
12 Jul
The Sacklers engaged in an intergenerational, half-century program of drug-pushing; starting by creating the market for benzos and culminating in creating the opioid epidemic. They made a vast fortune off the misery they created and today they're richer than the Rockefellers.

1/ The columnated facade of the Serpentine Sackler Gallery; beh
The family drug company, Purdue Pharma, created the addictive, destructive opioid Oxycontin, then systematically lied to the public about its safety, while bribing doctors and pharma distributors to overprescribe it, leading to over 850,000 US opioid deaths.

2/
The family used philanthropy to ensure its name was associated with galleries and museums rather than mass murder and had their lawyers threaten their critics (like me) and when that stopped working, they stashed billions offshore.

reuters.com/article/us-pur…

3/
Read 21 tweets
12 Jul
Batman (1943), “The Bat’s Cave” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656517228…
Batman (1943), “The Bat’s Cave” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656517228…
Batman (1943), “The Bat’s Cave” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656517228…
Read 8 tweets
12 Jul
Kolchak: The Night Stalker (1974), “Mr. R.I.N.G.” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656482725…
Kolchak: The Night Stalker (1974), “Mr. R.I.N.G.” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656482725…
Kolchak: The Night Stalker (1974), “Mr. R.I.N.G.” gameraboy2.tumblr.com/post/656482725…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(