Today's vote on the aid cut cannot undo the damage a hastily implemented cut has wrought on the UK aid programme. Programmes abandoned midway through. Contracts broken. People laid off. Morale hit. Reputation damaged.
if the government really wants to move to a lower aid spend through this Parliament, as is now clear from its motion, it should have had the honesty to legislate in advance to amend the act setting out the 0.7% target
and then it should have implemented the cut in a sensible value for money way -- rather than slamming on the brakes, pretending this was a short-term move - but now admitting it isn't.
and if MPs vote for the motion today, the govt will have to legislate. This motion can't override the legal commitments in the act as far as I can see.
the move was always pretty dubious legally - now it is explicitly setting out its intention to breach the act. so we have bad VFM, bad faith, a bad start to Global Britain, a shadow over the newly created FCDO and reduced our moral authority at the COP.
development was one of the areas where other govts acknowledged we were world beating.. even if Parliament votes to restore the 0.7% (and am personally not a fan of input targets), the govt's short-termist actions will cast a long shadow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
watching Policy Exchange event on Northern Ireland with Brandon Lewis and David Frost .. terrible broadcast quality - not sure hybrid events are the way forward.. anyway will tweet
Lewis starting by talking up what is going on in NI .. (without any mention of the protocol opportunities). Continuing to work on New Decade New Approach which brought Stormont back...
committed to legislate a package on legacy to help NI move forward.. determined to work across the board in NI on how to move forward..
we are celebrating the fifth birthday of @tradegovuk next Tuesday
first we are discussing how you go about creating a new department and new capacity from scratch - with @JohnAlty1@Lorand_Bartels@SamuelMarcLowe - and me ... join us at 11.30
then we are discussing Parliament's role - or lack of it - in scrutinising trade policy with @hhesterm@AlexanderHorne1 Mark Garnier from Trade Select Cttee and Jill Barrett
yesterday we looked at the referendum day experiences of Hilary Benn, Joanna Cherry and Claire Fox @UKandEU#Brexitwitnessarchive -- so today let's look further...
Philip Hammond was Foreign Secretary .. a eurosceptic Remainer.. he told us what happened to the Cabinet the day after
Intriguing choice of muzak while waiting for Michael Gove to unveil lessons form the pandemic.... may feel obliged to live tweet... (there was applause at one stage...) can you really be this late for an online speech? Maybe Lindsay Hoyle has summoned him?
v interesting that this is being hosted by Smarter Govt Commission (but smart does not extend to being on time..). Nick Herbert refers to bold Ditchley speech last year (I thought it was a bit of a non-event..) . Yippee Q and A...
Gove - opening - this is one of those times when need for reform more evident.. made strengths and weaknesses made more vivid... Lots of wartime parallels here (Johnson as Attlee??? new one that)
Some thoughts on the Cameron/Greensill/Crothers affair.. we have focussed a lot on ministers and civil servants. The rules clearly need tightening up - but at least there is a semblance of rules - but there is a grey area.
One of the Maude/Crothers reforms of the Cabinet Office was to bring in a lot of business expertise.. give them desks in govt -- and a role advising on managing contracts with strategic suppliers