Your tweet is incompatible with the liberal order
https://twitter.com/conor64/status/1414999633957330950
Do people honestly believe that the Lumières would have had any freaking problem w/ a continued questioning of
-theories of equality
-legal reasoning
-the inner-workings of rationalism
-&, ahem, so-called "neutral" principles of law?
-theories of equality
-legal reasoning
-the inner-workings of rationalism
-&, ahem, so-called "neutral" principles of law?
"̶E̶n̶l̶i̶g̶h̶t̶e̶n̶m̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶r̶e̶l̶e̶a̶s̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶m̶a̶n̶ ̶f̶r̶o̶m̶ ̶a̶ ̶s̶t̶a̶t̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶b̶o̶n̶d̶a̶g̶e̶.̶. . . ̶H̶a̶v̶e̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶c̶o̶u̶r̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶y̶o̶u̶r̶ ̶o̶w̶n̶ ̶u̶n̶d̶e̶r̶s̶t̶a̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶!̶"
"Don't ever question anything I wrote"
-Immanuel Kant
"Don't ever question anything I wrote"
-Immanuel Kant
Per this criticism, the real tyrant in the Dreyfuss Affair was Émile Zola
https://twitter.com/DeborahKnox/status/1414998679996469252
Also, since some seem confused, questioning the "foundations of the liberal order" is not the same as being anti-liberal. It means that people are questioning the history of how liberalism has manifested & the laws & systems this *manifestation* has produced.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
