This is a weird response, imho. I never questioned your intelligence. Frankly, I find the inference odd & the implication unfair. Lots of smart people are wrong about the points they think they're making. I would assume the architect of the 1619 Project would agree. 1/
As for my tweet: When Biden et al call the Texas & Georgia legislation "Jim Crow on steroids" or the worst attack on Democracy since the Civil War(!) I take them to be claiming that the essential crime of Jim Crow had to do with voting. I think that's ludicrous. 2/
The moral horror of both slavery & Jim Crow, again imho, was about the dehumanization, the violence, the cruelty, the denial of dignity and rights. Yes, one of those denied rights was voting. But on the list of moral horrors, voting was pretty far down on the list. 3/
Today we have Democrats, journalists -- including, apparently, you -- who think (and certainly suggest) that Jim Crow's defining feature was *voting restrictions!* I think that's absurd both on the merits and as messaging. 4/
Fundamental human rights aren't about voting so much as about human dignity and equality. I think those are more important and I think anyone who thinks otherwise on the merits is wrong for obvious reasons. But if it's not obvious to you, here's my thinking 5/
It seems to me the moral horror of Jim Crow wasn't primarily or centrally about voting but about the violation of the rights MLK invoked in the Bill of Rights and the Declaration -- equality before the law and most of all the right to life. 6/
Denying people the right to vote simply by virtue of their status at birth is profoundly wrong. (And, FYI, that isn't happening *anywhere* in America today!). Even so, denying people their human dignity or life because of their birth status is exponentially more evil. And...7/
Suggesting, never mind shouting, that the denial of drive-thru voting is equivalent to legally sanctioned apartheid (& lynching etc) strikes me as a grotesque trivialization of Jim Crow. And I have to say I am totally flummoxed as to how you could see it otherwise. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Stephen your weird hard-on for me continues to amaze. As I’ve written countless times now, there’s nothing in conservatism or classical liberal theories of government that doesn’t allow for extraordinary measures to fight pandemics. 1/
George Washington and other founders went to great lengths — including sending people door to door — to fight Yellow Fever and other disease outbreaks. There are centuries of laws and precedents on my side. statutesandstories.com/blog_html/an-a… 2/
If you read what I wrote in my latest column or much of anything I’ve written about the pandemic you’d know this. But I can’t tell if you’ve ever read anything of mine other than my tweets and the title of my first book. 3/
Good thread. Here’s mine:
I find the “conservatism was always a con” stuff to be total b.s. It misses the fact that people(s) can change over time. The neo-populist right isn’t revealing conservatism’s “true colors” it’s trying to replace conservatism. Many admit it. 1/
Ideological commitments ≠ identity politics. People and parties change because cultures change. A lot of Democrats say they are socialist today. This doesn’t mean Ds were always secretly socialist and only now are showing their “true colors.” 2/
The left’s changed a lot over the last 40 years. But you don’t hear people trying to seriously argue that Sam Nunn or Scoop Jackson were just providing cover for socialists or were secret socialists, because they weren’t. 2021 Al Gore is a different dude than 1990 Gore. 3/
This is complicated because there are MANY worse franchises than LOTR. And there are several that are more overrated. It's just hard to score because many are worse AND more overrated but still less well-rated than LOTR. So: Thread... 1/
Then there's the issue of great movies that launched mediocre franchises. Usually it's the sequel that creates a franchise, so sometimes it's two good movies and then crap for miles. For example, both Alien & Aliens were Great movies. The rest? Not.
2/
Lord of the Rings is that rare franchise where none of the movies were *great*, but all were good (not even Star Wars or James Bond can claim that). So the average grade is better than a lot of franchises launched by great movies. 3/
Yawn. I got plenty. But first: I stand by my view that it reflects very poorly on you that you take Schlicter seriously. That was the main point of my response to you. He’s a deceitful and pathetic troll. But since you can’t see that. I’ll pretend you asked the question. 1/
She didn’t “attack the base.” Show me a quote from Cheney where she attacked the base. She said Trump lied about the election being stolen. That’s factually true. If some people are triggered by that, okay. But that’s not “attacking the base.”
2/
Indeed, the idea that defenestrating Cheney is a sign of seriousness only makes sense at all if you believe the party is deadly serious about being a Trumpist cult. 3/
Having just heard the 5,000th Trump apologist pundit make the same argument(s), I feel like venting.
So, as the say, thread:
1/
If your only -- or even simply your first -- point in defense of Trump is that Democrats are hypocrites or have double standards, you are in effect arguing that the left dictates your standards. ...
2/
If you say Trump can't or shouldn't be held to account because liberals didn't hold their own side accountable for (what you allege) was similar incitement or behavior, what you're really saying is you care less about your own standards than the hypocrisy of the left...
3/
So overnight my feed filled with people votesplaining to me what are and aren’t the only legitimate reasons for how I should vote. Some friendly, some not. To all of you: Please peddle it somewhere else. 1/
There is no single “only way to decide.” There is no lone consideration — policy, character, sending a message. People have been shouting binary choice at me for five years as if saying it makes it true. It’s not. 2/
They shriek how voting “symbolically” wastes a vote. Well, my vote is definitionally symbolic in DC. And B) it’s only wasted in the sense you think I should use it differently. “Why are you wasting good steak on chili?” Well, its my steak and it’s my f’ing vote. 3/