1) #GETTR founder Miles Guo Wengui (aka Miles Kwok) pled the Fifth when asked in federal court about his money man, William Je. He didn't dispute that Je is a member of the CCP's Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CCPPC). en.cppcc.gov.cn
2) #GETTR founder Guo is asked at the April 22, 2021 federal Strategic Vision trial, "Who is William Je?"
Guo: "The Fifth Amendment."
3) Strategic Vision: "Aren't you concerned with Mr. William Je being your money man if he is associated with the CPPCC?"
4) Miles Guo Wengui (aka Miles Kwok), the founder of #GETTR, admitted in the trial that his "ultimate concern" was not to overthrow the CCP, but to fight the Wang Qishan faction within the CCP that had ousted his sponsor, Deputy Minister of State Security Ma Jian.
5) In the trial, Miles Guo Wengui admitted that he met with senior Ministry of State Security officials in his New York CIty home in May 2017.
Guo admitted he signed a letter to Xi Jinping that he didn't "cross the red line" in exposing too much dirt on CCP leaders.
6) At the Strategic Vision trial, Miles Guo Wengui refused to tell the court, on grounds of self-incrimination, whether or not it was true that the CCP retaliated against him by freezing his assess in Hong Kong and the Mainland: "I am invoking the Fifth Amendment."
7) Miles Guo Wengui admitted he received Communist Chinese Deputy Minister of State Security Liu Yanping at his New York home in May 2017.
Strategic Vision: "Mr. Guo, you were bargaining with him over your assets, though, weren't you?"
Guo: "I am invoking the Fifth Amendment."
8) In the Strategic Vision trial, #GETTR founder Miles Guo Wengui would not tell the court whether he was getting money from Communist China.
Twice he pled the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination to avoid answering.
9) Miles Guo Wengui invoked the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination to avoid telling a US federal court whether he was taking money through Communist China at the time he became a business partner with Steve Bannon in 2017-18.
10) In the federal trial on April 22, Miles Guo Wengui invoked the Fifth Amendment THREE TIMES when asked who was funding his front company's lawsuit against Strategic Vision, and when asked about a "loan" from his CCP money man for the front company.
11) #GETTR founder Miles Guo Wengui admitted in federal court that he had told Strategic Vision that the manager of his business operations (who also managed Steve Bannon's Rule of Law Society) was a member of the Chinese Communist Party.
12) Miles Guo Wengui tells court he "cannot recall" whether his lawyer @DanPodhaskie was speaking on his behalf in telling media that Guo & "Bannon have a joint mission in regards to China, which is to get rid of the radical cadre" inside the CCP. (And not to oust entire CCP.)
@DanPodhaskie 13) Bannon's business partner and #GETTR founder Miles Guo Wengui pleads against self-incrimination when asked about his CCP "money man."
Strategic Vision: "And you introduced William Je to close associates as your money man, haven't you?"
Guo: "The Fifth Amendment."
14) #GETTR founder Miles Guo Wengui refuses to tell the federal court about his CCP "money man" sending cash:
Strategic Vision: "And he [William Je] sends money to places when you ask him to do so, doesn't he?"
Guo: "The Fifth Amendment. I'm invoking the Fifth Amendment."
15) Miles Guo Wengui won't tell the court who owns Guo Media, reputed to be one of the companies that spawned #GETTR.
Strategic Vision: "Do you own Guo Media?"
Guo: "I'm invoking the Fifth Amendment."
SV: "Do you know who owns it?"
Guo: "I'm invoking the Fifth Amendment."
16) Federal Judge Lewis Liman asked Miles Guo Wengui if he and Steve Bannon had a "joint mission in regard to China, which is to get rid of the radical cadre inside the Communist Party."
Guo replied: "I don't altogether agree."
17) Strategic Vision asked Miles Guo Wengui in federal court about his whether he believes famous statement that 99.99 percent of the Chinese Communist Party is "decent people."
Guo said "No."
Strategic Vision: "Okay. So closer to 99 percent, then?"
Guo: "I don't know."
18) Miles Guo Wengui again refused to tell the court whether he told my colleague & me that he had been unable to take money out of Communist China since becoming a "dissident."
Guo: "I'm invoking the Fifth Amendment."
This was a civil case. Guo was invoking a criminal defense.
19) I had erred in previous tweets by saying that Miles Guo Wengui invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked if he was still working for the Chinese Ministry of State Security.
Guo legally did not deny the allegation. He indignantly called it "rubbish," but that is not a denial.
20) By claiming "I don't really know what you're talking about" and calling it "absolutely rubbish," Guo is not perjuring himself because to plead ignorance and act indignant is not legally a denial. Guo worked with the MSS while in China under MSS Deputy Minister Ma Jian.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Congressman Jamie Raskin, speaking at 0:40 on this video, represents the second largest USAID contractor, taking in $161.4 million in USAID "awards" in 2021. developmentaid.org/news-stream/po…
Jamie Raskin is also the representative in Congress of this giant USAID contractor, Global Communities, which took in $160,000,000 in 2023.
In late November, two intelligence community groups met separately in the homes of two former senior intelligence officials on how to infiltrate loyalists of Obama DNI James Clapper into the Trump administration.
One meeting took place at the home of former Obama official who was deputy director of ODNI. The other was at the home of a former senior national intelligence service member's home in McLean. The two individuals are linked through spouses/employees of a private intelligence contractor.
At the two gatherings, members discussed how to burrow in laterally and select the promotions of others to maintain the Obama/Clapper/Brennan networks at the top bureaucratic levels of the Trump intelligence community.
All of them had worked for Clapper and other senior Obama officials at ODNI, CIA, @NatReconOfc, or the Department of Defense.
Did one of the meetings take place at this person's house?
Here's how their strategy works: They mobilize appointees at other agencies to open up senior career positions, then move their favored ideologues laterally into those senior career positions at other intelligence agencies.
Once moved into those senior career posts, it is very difficult to remove them.
Some, like Kim F at @NGA_GEOINT, are moved from intelligence posts through a revolving door to Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs).
Some of the better known FFRDCs include MITRE, Rand Corp., and MIT Lincoln Labs.
Other revolving doors include Aerospace Corp., Booz-Allen-Hamilton, and Peraton. These companies are notorious, taxpayer-funded holding farms for the deep staters from within CIA and DIA.
The FFRDCs provide favored ideologues with an income until another senior government intelligence position opens up after a few months, at which point the seniors move them to those vacant top career posts.
The relations are not only professional and ideological, but can be deeply personal, down to a sexual nature of the type that should deprive offenders of their security clearances. But they protect one another.
If Senate Republicans don't confirm Matt Gaetz as attorney general & Kash Patel as FBI director, President Trump should sign an executive order to dissolve the FBI by rescinding the July 26, 1908 order that the FBI calls its founding document.
The FBI cannot be reformed. We need better, more effective federal law enforcement and counterintelligence than the FBI provides - and one free of the taint of decades of abuses. Only Gaetz & Patel can do that. Here's how the process might look.
Grok, Perplexity, and ChatGPT can't find a law that established the FBI. When you ask ChatGPT for the law, it gives the 1908 attorney general memorandum, saying "the FBI was formed through an executive order rather than a specific law."
🧵 Destruction of federal records outside the confines of the Federal Records Act (FRA) is a crime.
That destruction is going on right now.
To report report unauthorized disposition, email UnauthorizedDisposition@nara.gov.
The FRA has not been enforced anywhere in the federal government over the last 16+ years. archives.gov/news/topics/fe…
2) Any federal employee altering or destroying a federal record, prior to meeting its appropriate National Archives & Records Administratin (NARA)-approved retention period, after November 5th should be caught and prosecuted for violating the Federal Records Act.
Each agency's Senior Agency Official for Records Management and Agency Records Officers must also be held legally responsible.
Trump47 should remove & replace failed NARA leadership and comprehensively reform the government's records management system.
4 years ago today: @Politico breaks false story of the 51 intelligence and national security former officials saying Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. politico.com/news/2020/10/1…
NY Post contacted many of the Spies Who Lied to get a response. Here's the list, directly quoted from @nypost:
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group: Didn’t respond.
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer [and former advisory board member of @ProjectLincoln, which was co-founded by a registered agent of Russia]: Declined to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.