I would like to note. That EVERY SINGLE thing I claimed from the beginning regarding the network infrastructure configuration in Arizona was just proven true today, on the record, by an expert witness.
If networks were shared, within the county or state, that single breach /1
If networks were shared, within the county or state, that single breach /1
https://twitter.com/cchampion_z06/status/1391639424526548992
Could lead to the access of EVERY SINGLE MACHINE on the private side of the network. Once you get past the gatekeeper, if updates, malware/virus software, password best practices, are not completed and follow guidelines, you can create your own little back door to a machine /2
On the protected side which will just sit there waiting for the right moment that the election machines are turned on. The moment the time is right, you can then access anything, do your business, and then remotely activate the EXACT scripts talked about today to cover your /3
Tracks by overloading the memory allocation size of the logs. The election equipment will have information on data sent/received, but only the routers will tell you the exact mac addresses in which this originated to. Imagine a jewelry heist, to quote the president, /4
The jewels were stolen, you see that they aren’t there. You know they were taken, the inventory clearly is modified, now HOW did the theif get in? Which door did they come through, which cameras were active in that area so that you can catch the license plate of the theifs car /5
They should be able to unequivocally prove data has been modified without the routers. The question is can they determine WHO modified it. That is going to be the grand scheme of this whole endeavor. It is the missing piece to the puzzle, the router logs are the videos from /6
The security cameras at the heist.
Out of everything we learned today, it is BRUTALLY evident that the county is NOT using best practices on their IT infrastructure as many in the media have purported to be obviously impossible. “This is a wealthy county, do you really think /7
Out of everything we learned today, it is BRUTALLY evident that the county is NOT using best practices on their IT infrastructure as many in the media have purported to be obviously impossible. “This is a wealthy county, do you really think /7
They don’t know what they are doing or would skimp on equipment or hire somebody incompetent” as I believe @Garrett_Archer told me once. The answer to that is no, I don’t think they are stupid enough or cheap enough to skimp. But I know humans are lazy, tech illiterate, /8
And continuously refuse to apply updates all the time. Hell, if I have a project due, I’m gonna hit the hide button on the reminder all day long. Humans make mistakes. The issue here is that due to @katiehobbs decision to apparently co-mingle the IT infrastructure for the /9
Election, she either knowingly or unknowingly opened up the MOST SACRED RIGHT in this country, our vote, to outside actors because she exponentially increased the chances that a lazy, busy, incompetent, or bad actor, didn’t apply updates and allowed their machine to become /10
The nexus for a breach. Quite possibly unknowingly.
This is the ENTIRE REASON for dominions manual to DIRECTLY address this and specify a closed network for the election equipment. @katiehobbs LITERALLY added a line item, in the contract, to ignore this recommendation /11
This is the ENTIRE REASON for dominions manual to DIRECTLY address this and specify a closed network for the election equipment. @katiehobbs LITERALLY added a line item, in the contract, to ignore this recommendation /11
From dominions own manual. You can read yourself in the contract.
The fact that there was CLEARLY a data breach, per the FBI, on systems which were co-mingled, many of which even the election systems PC’s had NO UPDATES applied since they were new, is absolutely disgusting /12
The fact that there was CLEARLY a data breach, per the FBI, on systems which were co-mingled, many of which even the election systems PC’s had NO UPDATES applied since they were new, is absolutely disgusting /12
And whomever is in charge of auditing @maricopacounty election machines should be fired IMMEDIATELY. The next question is the obvious one, WHY WERE THESE FAULTS AND LACK OF CRITICAL UPDATES NOT DISCOVERED IN THE LAST 2 “AUDITS” ?!?!?!??? How could something so obvious, so /13
Important, so clear, be missed by not one, but two “accredited” audit firms? Was it in their scope? Seems like it should obviously be something that is checked when the systems are certified before each election even if it wasn’t in the scope or SLI or Pro V&V. Next question /14
If they didn’t have this scope, did they also not check, or did the SOS @katiehobbs not check to confirm the configuration of each of the ICP-2 tabulators to confirm the wireless and cellular interfaces were in fact not enabled? Or are we just relying on a private company /15
A FOREIGN company based in Canada, to confirm these devices are disabled? Where are the reports showing status on these interfaces if they were checked in the certification? Surely the SOS could easily provide the paperwork logs showing these devices status reports no? /16
Next, let’s discuss the “sharpiegate” situation that everyone claimed was not an issue. Todays testimony proved, once again, exactly what I stated months ago. Yes in a perfect world ballots are designed, laid out, such that bleed through will not affect a ballot cast. They /17
Are designed such that the ovals do not align from front to back in case of a bleed through situation. This is where the ballot printer alignment is SO CRITICAL. If the ballot is printed out of alignment, it then changed the relationship front to back on the ballot. Those /18
Critical areas you tried to hard to avoid lining up front to back, now have the opportunity to do exactly that. This, as stated, can and does create a situation with stray marks, overvotes, extra votes not meant to be cast, etc. I find it odd, that per testimony today, /19
That the mail in ballots from run beck appear to be printed very well, yet the ballots printed for in person voting, I believe they said roughly 168k, are the ones affected by all of these printing irregularities. Who votes in person the majority of the time? Conservatives. /20
Was this done intentionally? 3200 percent out of alignment is a CRITICAL flaw. There is no question it is unacceptable and even the liberal news can agree. Why were precinct poll workers also specifically instructed and provided sharpies? In a perfect world with alignment /21
In spec and accurate, this would be a non issue as @Garrett_Archer has stated, and he is correct. But with alignment out so far, it absolutely CAN become an issue and confirms witnesses who said their in person ballots were flagged as overvotes in person. Those same voters /22
We’re then instructed to just “push the accept button” or whatever the option is called. Who certified the ballot printers for these locations? How could they be certified to be within spec with test ballots, yet still print ballots 3200 percent out of alignment? Clearly, no /23
Question, either the printers weren’t checked, or something occurred to make them suddenly start printing out of alignment after they were fine for the tests if the tests were done.
So many questions… so little transparency from @maricopacounty it’s truly shameful IMHO.
/end
So many questions… so little transparency from @maricopacounty it’s truly shameful IMHO.
/end
@jellen805 @CannConActual @AmericanREI5 @melissa5053 @ArizonaAudit @maricopacounty @Garrett_Archer @RaheemKassam @RealMarkFinchem @SonnyBorrelli @kelliwardaz @WendyRogersAZ
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
