This is a long thread, but I think worth reading, about how governmental entities are trying to control covid-related dialogue (specifically about the vaccines). It starts & ends with this letter. @noorchashm is an immunologist at UPenn with over 2 decades' experience. 1/ 
He started a campaign called "ScreenB4Vacccine" based on his evidence-based belief that vaccinating people with natural immunity is not only unnecessary, but creates a heightened risk of adverse effects. The practice thus violates medical ethical rules, Noorchashm contends 2/
He is no stranger to one-sized fits all medical prescriptions and their potentially catastrophic effects, as his wife was a victim of precisely this practice: she died following a procedure that was conducted without adequate assessment of her individual circumstances 3/
(the procedure likely spread hidden cancer cells that may well have remained dormant).
For nothing more than advocating for a practice based on his decades of experience, the doctor first was questioned by an investigator, and then sent the letter posted in the first tweet 4/
For nothing more than advocating for a practice based on his decades of experience, the doctor first was questioned by an investigator, and then sent the letter posted in the first tweet 4/
This is agency -- an arm of the government -- telling a doctor to shut up, and not to say anything that departs from CDC guidelines. He is being threatened with prosecution (civil, presumably) if he does not follow these orders. This is not a free society. 5/
This is not a Western-style democracy. This is outrageous, frightening, and must not be tolerated. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
