Key points not in the story that are worth mentioning:
1. Donor data for DMFI PAC beyond 01/25/21 (GA Special Election) isnt yet public.
2. As of 01/25, DMFI had $101K cash on hand—yet they've spent $660K against Turner, so there is new money (which Schusterman could still be).
1. Donor data for DMFI PAC beyond 01/25/21 (GA Special Election) isnt yet public.
2. As of 01/25, DMFI had $101K cash on hand—yet they've spent $660K against Turner, so there is new money (which Schusterman could still be).
https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1416054425634971649
There's a reason why I haven't reported this yet, even though these numbers have been available since February.
Nearly all the money Schusterman gave DMFI was spent BEFORE their recent blitz against Turner—so we can't say for sure she's the donor behind it, though she may be.
Nearly all the money Schusterman gave DMFI was spent BEFORE their recent blitz against Turner—so we can't say for sure she's the donor behind it, though she may be.
Assuming DMFI is a semi-annual filer with the FEC, we'll know for sure who funded their recent blitz on Nina Turner on 07/30.
I think @theintercept was a bit premature on this report because there's lots of new money that hasn't been accounted for yet.
So while they may wind up being vindicated, it could also wind up being that this story is at best incomplete.
So while they may wind up being vindicated, it could also wind up being that this story is at best incomplete.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
