It's very neat and tidy, as Philip Bump notes. And that's suspicious. So here are the possibilities. It's real or fake. It was leaked deliberately by the Kremlin or not. It's supposed to hurt Trump or not. 1/ washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
It might seem obvious at least that it's supposed to hurt Trump. But it's not obvious. Because, almost certainly, it won't hurt Trump. The Kremlin leaking that it has kompromat on the sky, to the effect that it's blue, won't cause more people to believe the sky is blue. 2/
There's a good chance it will help Trump, therefore. Normally we don't apply the 'no such thing as bad publicity' show biz rule to political scandals. But the effect of this leak is to put the focus back on 'Russia Russia Russia' and that's good for Trump. 3/
Per that viral thread Greenwald helped spread, 'Russia Russia Russia' is Trump's best justification for keeping up the Big Lie. He is entitled to say 2020 was fraud, even without evidence, as payback for the Russia 'hoax' from 2016. 4/ outsidevoices.substack.com/p/author-of-th…
So suppose - just suppose - you are Putin and you want to help Trump, in 2021, going forward to 2024. (Because you've got kompromat on him or just because he's a known fool and ongoing threat to US stability.) How would you? You could fake up stuff, like this, and leak it. 5/
Or, strange to say, you could just leak real documents from 2016. What's harm in showing your real cards, if you're Putin? Sane people have already guessed with high confidence. You aren't telling the crazies anything bad that will disabuse them of their Trump cultism. 6/
You hereby keep 'Russia Russia Russia' in the news, while Trump trumps around, trumpeting the Big Lie. And that's good for Trump. But it also serves as a gentle reminder to Trump: remember who got you here. 7/
Of course that raises the question: what kompromat could they have that would be worse than, say, an open leak that they have kompromat? In 2016 this leak would still have killed Trump, probably. In 2021 even bad leaks are a wash in MAGA-land. 8/
I'm not a peeliever, particularly. I always figured it was most likely financial. These papers apparently say the evidence was gathered while Trump was visiting Russia, but that could still be financial. Whatever. It could be something Trump would deem more embarrassing. 9/
Anyway, let's continue on the assumption that this is a deliberate Kremlin leak to help Trump - and send him a gentle 'remember' reminder. Do you leak real papers or fake ones, if you are Putin? It's sort of a toss-up. Start with fake. 10/
Fake may be debunked in weeks or months to come. That will for sure feed the MAGA narrative that 'Russia Russia Russia' is fake. If I were writing the Ludlum novel, I'd call this one "The Gettier Conundrum". Leaks of fake material, by the Kremlin, telling the truth. 11/
Leaking real documents, on the other hand, will cause them not to be debunked in the weeks, months, years to come; will lead to an absolutely unbridgeable epistemic gap in 2024. MAGA will believe this stuff is fake, hence 'all is permitted'; everyone else will know it's real. 12/
Final possibility. What if you leak documents that are half-true? What do reasonable people know at this point? That there were ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Putin. The Trump Tower deal Trump lied about. Manafort. Meetings to coordinate re: Hillary's emails. 13/
It could be that the Russia stuff doesn't really go much beyond what we know. What we know is really bad, but it could be worse. But we don't know it's worse. But that leaves Putin with flexibility to fake up credible evidence that it's much worse and we're none the wiser. 14/
If I were Putin and I wanted to farm chaos, going into 2024, I'd get creative about leaking - real and/or fake - from 2016. That's the point when the epistemic world-lines split into the MAGA-verse of Madness, in which 'Russia Russia Russia' is fake, and the real world. 15/
Final thought: Trump and the GOP. Kremlin Papers, real or fake, the GOP is hell-bound in a deplorable handbasket. If it turns out that the Kremlin Papers are real, the GOP still has precisely one plank in its platform: Trump. Their nearest exist is far behind them. 16/
I do not hereby opine on the authenticity of these Kremlin Papers. They are suspiciously tidy and the timing is odd. But they won't hurt Trump, and will probably help him, enlivening MAGA's bitter, implanted 'memory' that 'Russia Russia Russia' was a Deep State hoaxcoup. 17/
Am I missing anything? 18/
Final thought: if Putin were going to leak real/fake docs about Trump being compromised, to help Trump - if that makes sense - why wouldn't he have done it already? Answer: before Jan 6 we didn't know that we were through the looking-glass. MAGA is with him no matter what. 19/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This sort of Dale Carnegie 101 point is reasonable in the abstract but hard to know what to do with in practice. It seems like public health officials and Dems are doing - well, not the best they can, but they are trying to reach persuadables. (There have been slips, sure.) 1/
But that leaves a large basket of right-wing anti-vaxxers who are unpersuadable by Dems and public health officials, due to FOX news (and OAN & etc.) and negative partisanship. @michaelbd and McLaughlin taking the 'feelings are facts' line, with regard to this lot, is - bad. 2/
Blaming the left for not reaching out actually makes things worse because it doesn't afford the left useful Dale Carnegie tips but does give the unpersuadables a feeling that it's the left's fault that they are unpersuaded - and feelings are facts (but only on the right). 3/
MY is screwing with us but I lectured on this! The Ur-Indie era MPDG run is Lulu to Leeloo. That is, Demme's "Something Wild" (1986), largely forgotten - although it makes the MPDG lists - to Besson's "The Fifth Element" (1997) which clearly qualifies but is seldom counted in. 1/
In film, it goes back to classics like "Bringing Up Baby" (1938) and "My Fair Lady" (1964) - the latter is later but, due to its "Pygmalion" origins, makes the clear connection to earlier English drama. 2/
The English original MPDG is Gilbert's "Pygmalion and Galatea". These were originally described as 'fairy comedies', showing the aptness of 'pixie', later. 3/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pygmalion…
What's the genetic link between Schopenhauer's pessimism and "Hello, Dolly!" ?
Answer: "Hello, Dolly!" was based on a play by John Oxenford, who wrote a review piece for "Westminster Review", in 1853, "Iconoclasm in German Philosophy". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Oxen…
That review made it's way back to Germany, in translation, and made Schopenhauer's fame, late. From Safranksi's "Schopenhauer and the Wild Years in Philosophy".
The thread in question implies Trump himself, like his followers, probably doesn't believe any of his own claims about having evidence the election was stolen. And Trump himself gives a shout out about how great the thread is! He agrees! He's probably just getting it off Hannity!
And yet somehow it's not Trump who is showing "unmitigated contempt" by knowingly lying to the American people for months on end that he has reason to think the 2020 election was stolen; somehow it's not Trump voters who show contempt by being unwilling to accept the election. 2/
Seriously, we are supposed to re-watch the video of the insurrection, this time imagining it's all about the Steele Dossier. And that's supposed to make it better? It makes it worse. 3/
There's something right about this and something wrong about it. What is right about it is that D's should fight fire with Biden. They have to win over the median voter (as R's do not). 1/ thedailybeast.com/dems-helped-gi… via @thedailybeast
The thing that is wrong about this is it equates belief with culture war. Or, more specifically, it equates distance between belief points with culture war. But, come to think of it, that can't be right. You and I can believe different things without going to culture war. 2/
Culture war is a matter of deliberately inflaming certain facts of difference for political profit. That is almost exclusively an R game, since it often (not always) affords them tactical opportunities to lose the culture war while winning politically, based on grievance. 3/
Alright, @arrroberts needs to explain something to me. What the hell is Coleridge doing, mock-plagiarizing E.T.A Hoffmann's "The Golden Pot", as "The Book of the Two Worlds", in "Blackwoods", in 1822?
He jokes it isn't his but he doesn't mention Hoffmann by name. He just says he read a "pre-existent copy" of his own (alleged) work, written by a Cervantic character from Thought-Land (Germany).
Coleridge's Maxilian is Hoffmann's Anselmus, transposed from Dresden to Dublin. WFT?