Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
@BillyBostickson
Jul 17, 2021 • 13 tweets • 9 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
1. Some useful, albeit not fully developed, critiques of:

“The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review"

zenodo.org/record/5106841

have just been published here:
researchgate.net/publication/35…
by members of DRASTIC & others
@angoffinet @BahulikarRahul @MonaRahalkar @gdemaneuf
2. A refreshing contrast to the so-called "expert reactions" found here, including from one of the authors of the review (Prof David Robertson)!

"expert reaction to a preprint reviewing the evidence on the origins of SARS-CoV-2"

sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reactio… Image
3. Peter Gutierrez points out in his response that 4 of the authors of “The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review”, also wrote “Proximal Origin of SARS-COV-2”.

His critique focuses on:

1. RaTG13

2. Enhanced adaptation to the human host

news-medical.net/opinion/7fa9d1… ImageImageImage
4. As to be expected, Sydney University and its iconic virologist, Eddie Holmes, who is "not available for interview", are crowing over this biased review
sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/n… ImageImageImage
This review contains elementary errors as exposed here:
1.
one of the authors (Stuart Neil) then claimed
"Didn’t N501Y come up in ACE2 TG mice too?
Image
Professor Neil failed to respond
You will have to dig into the answers here

A thread with papers to educate Stuart here:
ImageImageImage
Which he didn't take kindly to

I guess it was his way of admitting he was wrong about N501Y? Image
Again Prof Neil, one of the authors of the review continues to embarrass himself. I am starting to think that the flawed N501 claim was actually written by him.
Image
Wrong again, "Prof"
ImageImage
He just can't admit his error, so I have to remind him
Image
A further elementary error in the review paper

The Straw Lab Fallacy

unroll @threadreaderapp
save @buzz_chronicles save

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillyBostickson

Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Nov 14
🧵Long live the lab-leak hypothesis!

1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.

researchgate.net/publication/39…
🧵Long live the quest for truth!

2. When that day finally comes & Baric raises his right hand, every word in there will be waiting for him


@RandPaul @RandPaulReview @TulsiGabbard
@SenJoniErnst @R_H_Ebright @jhas5 @ydeigin @gdemaneuf @mentju4 @emilyakopphsgac.senate.gov/media/reps/cha…
@RandPaul @RandPaulReview @TulsiGabbard @SenJoniErnst @R_H_Ebright @jhas5 @ydeigin @gdemaneuf @mentju4 @emilyakopp 🧵3. Watch the video explainer here

Courtesy of Google Notebook LM

vimeo.com/1136899679
Read 6 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Nov 12
✴️MICROPLASTICS IN YOUR BRAIN?

1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED

"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."

msn.com/en-us/health/o…
✴️3. NONE WERE FREE

"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Read 23 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Nov 6
🧵1. In the interview with @danaparish

Redfield stresses that the evidence points to lab creation for a reusable, aerosolized vaccine vector, with US complicity in funding/tech.

He says he is fed up with the cover-ups and predicts that full intel release would confirm this.
🧵2. Proof?

Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements

(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)

He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.

He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.
Read 21 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Oct 30
🧵1. Critique of preprint: SARS-COV-2 like FCS hype

Media article 1

dailymail.co.uk/health/article…

Media article 2

straitstimes.com/world/coronavi…
🧵2. The Authors State:

"Of note, the spike protein of this novel bat coronavirus possesses a functional FCS at the S1/S2 junction with a unique amino acid sequence motif (RDAR) that differs from that found in SARS-CoV-2 (RRAR) by only 1 amino acid."

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
🧵3. Two fatal flaws: Overreach & Undermine

A. The authors of this study on the BRZ batCoV from Brazil unfortunately overreach themselves when they connect it to SARS-CoV-2 origins.

B. The FCS evidence actually undermines the flawed hypothesis of direct bat to human emergence!
Read 13 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Oct 25
🧵1. Honest question

Did you try to read my pangolin coronavirus report but gave up because it was too long or too complex?

If you didn't see it, link is in next tweet

Help is at hand!

Thanks to Google's pretty amazing "notebook lm"

A video explainer

notebooklm.google.com/notebook/1b843…
🧵2. Just in case..

The massive report is here:

researchgate.net/publication/39…
🧵3. An updated brief explanation on Medium

The Pangolin-Mediated Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

medium.com/p/the-pangolin…
Read 8 tweets
Billy Bostickson 🏴👁&👁 🆓 Profile picture
Oct 4
"The molecular biology capabilities of WIV & the genome assessment are consistent with the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 was a lab-engineered virus that was part of a bank of chimeric viruses in Zheng-Li Shi's laboratory at WIV that escaped from containment"

usrtk.org/wp-content/upl…
2. Hypothetical Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created full-length a infectious clone in pBAC-CMV using an unpublished bat Coronavirus genome as template (BatCoVX)

page 85
3. Hypothesis 3:

Between 2017 and 2019, WIV created chimeric Bat-CoV-X viruses using the pBACCMV-BCOVX backbone and swapping out key cassettes with other bat Coronaviruses (RBD, RBM, etc.) and adding additional features such as a furin cleavage site
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(