People make the claim that academia is a "monoculture" b/c Democratic voters are over-represented, but here's the thing: we have two political parties. One of them is racist, denies science, & is increasingly pro-coup. It makes sense that academics tend towards the other option.
Also, voting for Democrats does not make someone a Democratic fan. Plenty of people--including those on college campuses--really don't like the Dem party for various reasons.

Again, we have 2 choices. Just 2. One of them is batshit, bigoted, & anti-democratic. The other is not.
While the GOP *is* increasingly monocultural, the Democratic party is not. The party is ethnically/culturally diverse, but also ideologically diverse.

Compare the number of intra-Dem conflicts over the past 4 years w/ intra-GOP conflicts.
Twitter is not real life, but it can be illustrative: how many left/left-of-center factions on here are there compared to right factions? &, even in terms of the real world, Dems famously spend their time fighting amongst each other, sometimes productively, sometimes not so much
In terms of academia, there's plenty of representation of principled conservative thought. There are also many subjects--like markets--they are debated from left, liberal, libertarian, or conservative positions

Milton Friedman & Friedrich Hayek are widely taught

This is great!
I've met *plenty* of libertarians in philosophy departments (in terms of political economy, not in terms of loving Gary Johnson). I wouldn't say many of them adore the Democratic party, but most of them vote Democratic. Because, again: 2 choices.
Also, there's the fact that the Koch bros have funded institutes all over US academia. In some cases, there have been concerns over undue influence. In others, academics feel they're completely free from pressure. regardless, tho, this isn't suppression of conservative thought
Anyways,
-Academia isn't monocultural. There's plenty of infighting--both disciplinary & political--among people who vote D.
-I'm glad principled conservative thought is taught. But principled conservative thought doesn't include "racism and endless lies"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

18 Jul
I feel like I just read a screed from a white child about how his Black dolls are so much cooler than his white friend's Black dolls
If you want to understand the dynamics of the CBC and Black candidates for Congress, maybe just try to do some factual reporting, instead of wish-casting your feelings in some kind of bizarre white-puppeteer act about Black people you like vs Black people you think are uncool.
The fact that Nina Turner is identified as Black in this tweet but Shontel Brown is not carries the implication that perhaps the CBC has some kind of lack of support for Black candidates. Which, again, sounds like white people playing puppeteer with Black people. Not your toys! Image
Read 4 tweets
18 Jul
The issue here is that such commentary obscures that the correlation is driven by bigotry: linking people *by ethnicity* to a government/bad actor & then directing violence towards them. If the bigotry did not exist, the correlation would not exist. Image
Here is an analogy. I do not mean it to be a direct comparison, but rather just an elucidation of the logic. If a Muslim man of color commits a crime, hate crimes against Muslims go up. If a white non-Muslim man commits the same crime, hate crimes against white men do not go up.
So, the bigotry driving these correlations can get erased if we just say, "There's a correlation between X actor [person or state] committing a bad act & increased hate crimes against people of shared ethnicity/culture." This correlation only exists in cases of *extant* bigotry.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul
I cannot take another 20 tweet thread from a millennial or zoomer about the unique suffering of their generations. Silent Gen & Boomers also went through economic crises, as well as the various delights of polio, dental surgery w/out pain killers, & military drafts.
And, while cishet white men went through all that, women, POC, and LGBTQ folks were subjected to even more great things, like legalized marital rape, apartheid & its long aftermath, & watching their friends die from a disease labeled the "Gay Plague."
That's not to say zoomers & millennials haven't had their own suffering. They've got plenty to reasonably complain about, including the growth of economic inequality. Every generation has had its own advances in some domains as well as its own pain in others.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jul
I don't know how much performative liberalism is at play here. I think it's more general group dynamics, such that people tend to act like the people around them. Also many older liberals have faith in the vaccines, but have a better-safe-than-sorry approach to masks
Anecdotally, when I went to a liberal area (St. Paul, MN) in mid June, the vax rate was high. People were still really cautious while entering places. Mostly b/c they seemed to want to ensure other people felt safe around them. There was a lot of "don't worry I'm vaccinated!"
Also anecdotally, I came from a low vax county where all are maskless & was shocked to see how many in St. Paul were wearing masks in the grocery store, knowing how many were vaxxed. But that % rapidly declined over just a week. A lot of this has to do w/ behavioral adaptation
Read 4 tweets
15 Jul
I know I shouldn't be surprised, but I'm always kind of shaken when I see US leftists 1. take a US-centric view on domestic affairs in other countries &/or 2. side w/ oppressive regimes over regular citizens & protesters just b/c the government is "communist" or "socialist"
Multiple things can be true:
-The U.S. embargo is bad
-Trump's sanctions made it worse
-Anti-Cuban rhetoric has been used for U.S. nationalistic purposes
-The Cuban gov't has also screwed over the Cuban people for reasons unrelated to U.S. actions
-The Cuban gov't is oppressive
It really is shocking to see ostensible leftists side w/ governments over protesters. The protesters aren't necessarily "right wing." They want food & medicine & electricity. And they have been beaten & imprisoned over the past week. 1-5 deaths are estimated.
Read 7 tweets
15 Jul
I wrote for @johnastoehr about the trope that colleges are descending into a kind of authoritarian conformity of social liberalism. The reality is academia is hardly “monocultural” & certain GOP ideas are antithetical to the project of education itself. editorialboard.com/p/theres-room-…
Writers from across the political spectrum love to opine about the death of "debate" on campuses, especially when it comes to conservative ideology.

But no one ever tells us which conservative views are being omitted & why exactly they are worthy of intellectual inquiry
Let’s be clear about a few things:
1. Certain forms of “intellectual conformity” are not actually bad
2. Coherent non-batshit conservative belief is well-represented in academia
3. A lot of current GOP *political* thought is antithetical to the entire project of education
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(