Saw "Roadrunner: A Film About Anthony Bourdain" today.
Morgan Neville has made some of my favorite documentaries of the last ten years. So I wasn't surprised it was great. I was surprised at some of the ways in which it was great.
I have an uncomfortably intimate relationship with suicide. Heroes of mine have killed themselves. Good friends, too. My mother's suicide upended my life in ways from which I'm still recovering, years later.
So anything dealing with suicide is a toss of the dice for me.
Is it going to ruin my day? My week?
Am I going to find something in it with which I connect in a way that is strangely comforting?
You never know until you roll those bones.
What I found in this film was as close a true representation as I've seen of someone who is a whole, complicated and intelligent person who chooses to do something irrational that hurts others because...people sometimes do that.
Over the years I've heard many people say, "I just don't know how people kill themselves. I don't know how they get there, how they make that decision."
To that I can only say: "I envy you."
I know how they get there. I've lingered in that particular doorway.
It isn't that you know you're going to hurt all the people who love and need you, that you'll be leaving a giant crater in all of their lives and decide you don't care.
It's that you feel, you really believe, things will likely be better for everyone without you in the picture.
There are a lot of ways to get there -- even for people who are talented, successful, beloved.
A key to understanding it in Bourdain, which I think the film explores brilliantly, is that from early childhood he knew he wasn't like other people. He didn't want what they wanted. He didn't understand why certain things, in which he had no interest, made them happy.
In his late teens and early 20s, he found kitchens. The hours: crazy and crushing. The people: misfit toys. The lifestyle: consuming. It alienated him from "normal people" - and he loved it.
I get that.
At around the same time, I fell in love with newspapers and newsrooms.
There are people for whom a job is a means to the rest of life -- a paycheck, some security, the foundation on which you can build the more important things.
And then there are those of us for whom what we are doing *is* how we are doing, always.
It's not always healthy or enviable. It's not to be romanticized. But, like the weather or substance addiction, it is also not in your head. It is a reality.
You can deal with it well or you can deal with it poorly.
How happy you're ever likely to be depends on that choice.
Seeing how much writing and creating were Bourdain's life, the way he struggled to center other things but could never achieve the balance he thought he should want...it was very sad, but powerfully relatable.
I've known people who can turn anything into heroin.
There is a scene, after he discovered Jiu Jitsu in his 50s, when a friend says he wouldn't stop talking about it. It was insufferable.
It gave me spasms of involuntary laughter because I could certainly relate.
I was that guy with boxing. With motorcycles. With books and records. With girls.
Some of this you can work on in therapy. Find tools to help. Some of it you can medicate. Some of it's just character. And character is destiny.
Which is not to say that some people are destined always to set themselves on fire.
But there are those who are that way inclined.
But the end - the mess, the depression, what he'd have called "the nasty bits" - those aren't his story and his legacy. That's just how it ended.
The things he left behind -- a daughter, a family and far-flung network of loving friends, an awful lot of good writing, good interviews, good television -- those are his legacy. And they're appropriately celebrated.
Can't recommend this film highly enough, if you can go in knowing that.
Had some early Sunday morning thoughts on errors, corrections, conflict, resolution, faith and journalism.
This is applicable to #UNC and the #NikoleHannahJones story, of course. But honestly, these are things I think about as a reporter all the time -- and have for many years.
We all, whatever we do, make errors.
I struggle with them as much as anyone. But I come to them with what I consider two enormous advantages:
1) I was raised by Southern Women, the Catholic Church and the United States Marine Corps.
2) I'm a professional journalist.
Let's take these one at a time.
What my mother, a Southern woman, taught me about making errors: It's inevitable. If you can laugh at it, laugh at it. If it's more serious than that, correct it and make restitution early. If you can do both, you're golden.
Walter Hussman was so committed to his core values of journalism, centering objectivity and the separation of news and opinion, that he touted them on...Tucker Carlson.
Carlson has depended in court on the argument his reputation is such that reasonable people would not consider anything he says on his show to be a statement of fact.
Even when he *literally tells you* he is offering undisputed facts.
Meeting with #NikoleHannahJones for an interview this week made me reflect on my June interview with Walter Hussman, the conservative Arkansas media magnate and #UNC megadonor who lobbied against hiring her.
It's worth talking a bit about these two people and interviews.
When I interviewed Hussman last month, he projected an intense folksiness -- sort of Mr. Rogers meets Bill Clinton.
Given Hussman's history with the Clintons in Arkansas, he might not love that comparison. But it's apt.
A part of this was Hussman saying to me, repeatedly, "Well, Joe, you and I are both reporters..." or "Well, since we're both journalists I think you understand..."
This is a common rhetorical device. Find an area of common ground, assert affinity, create a bond.
Gang, we should talk about some of the things I saw at yesterday's #UNC BOT meeting on tenure for #NikoleHannahJones.
I should start by saying my observations are informed by 20 years of professional reporting - covering cops and courts, local and state government, higher ed.
Given the controversy over the Nikole Hannah-Jones tenure issue, #UNC had to know there was going to be a large crowd at this meeting and they would see protests.
I wish I was kidding when I tell you I've seen multiple small town boards of aldermen handle protests much better.
I've been to a number of BOT meetings at The Carolina Inn, where they're generally held in one or several large ball rooms. Pre-pandemic, chairs were provided for the public. In the pandemic, those chairs were eliminated. A 75 person cap was in place yesterday, everyone standing.
An observation about infection clusters at UNC Schools - Chapel Hill and otherwise: It's been obvious from the beginning of planning there would be infections and clusters. That's why from the beginning students, staff and faculty expressed concerns - particularly w/ dorms. (1/6)
During that same time, the consistent message from administration and the UNC System office has been: Yeah. People are going to get sick. That's why we have isolation/quarantine dorms and, hopefully, enough hospital beds and testing capacity. (2/6)
What we're seeing now isn't an unforeseen event and should not be a shock to those who have been paying attention. It's what it actually looks like when harm prevention is one concern but not the primary concern in a plan of this type and magnitude. (3/6)