braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

First: We are a half-vaxxed country. And a country that looks like it is going to stay half-vaxxed: there is just too much money to be made by media grifters and too much political hay to be made by right-wing politicians seeking to win the Trump... 1/
...base for vaccination rates in the country as a whole to get above 50% before the Delta Variant sweeps through.

This is a catastrophe.

While hiking in Claremont Canyon earlier last week, I found myself to Andy Slavitt’s podcast. Andy had been one of the most positive... 2/
...influences on the rolling what-to-do-about-coronavirus debate. Yet I found it extremely disappointing to listen to:

On one of the podcasts I listened to he had as his guest Trump FDA Commissioner Scott Gotlieb. Gotlief had been one of the best of the Trump political... 3/
...appointees. (And, yes, I realize how incredibly low a bar that is, and how brutal is this damnation-with-faint-praise.) As I hiked down from Panoramic Ridge back to the house, I found myself depressed and let down.

The first reason I was let down was what seemed to... 4/
...be a constant mantra repeated over and over again by Slavitt and his guests alike: if you are vaccinated, resume your normal life without masks and without social distancing—you can do everything except go into a moist, crowded, hot batcave and sing for hours. And maybe... 5/
...you can do even that.

But that seems to me to completely ignore the fact that we are a half-vaccinated country. If you do get the Delta Variant in a breakthrough case, since we are a half vaccinated country and the Delta Variant’s R[0] is between 4 and 8, you will... 6/
...give the disease to between 2 and 4 people—say 3. And in two weeks, they will each give it to 3 people—now we are at 12. After two months your downstream chain of infections will have given the disease to about 363 people. And odds are that 4 of them will die.

If you... 7/
...mask up, and maintain social distancing, so that you don’t give your breakthrough case to anyone during the three days after which you are infectious before you realize you have symptoms, you save four lives. Now you can say that a breakthrough case is a low-probability... 8/
...event, and it is. You can say that it is no worse than drunk driving at night. Yes, you can say that.

Or you can say that the antivaxxers are immovable, and that each of them will catch the Delta Variant sooner or later, so all your giving the disease to them would do... 9/
...is move their death date forward in time by six months to a year: they had their chance to get vaxxed, they rejected it, so their deaths from drowning in their own mucus are none of their concern. Yes, you can say that.

The second reason I was let down was what seemed... 10/
...to be a constant mantra repeated over and over again by Slavitt and his guests: risk to you, risk to YOU, RISK to YOU, risk to YOU, risk to you, risk to you. Very rarely—in fact, if I counted correctly, more mentions from the snippets of recorded person-on-the-street... 11/
...than from Slavitt and his guests—was there any talk about the risks to *****US****.

On September 26, 2020, now-Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett allowed the Trump White House to host a crowded party for her. 30 people. Risks to her from having this nomination... 12/
...party were not that large. But, approximately, caught COVID-19 at that party. With a fourteen-day infection cycle, those 30 then gave it to 50 in mid-October, who then gave it to 80 in early November, who then gave it to 150 at the end of November, who then gave it to... 13/
...200 more in mid-December, 200 in early-January, and 200 in mid-January. Then it drops off—another 620 between then and now. A total of 1530 people. And that’s if the guests at Amy Coney Barrett’s party and their contacts behaved like normal Americans. They may not have... 14/
...—it might be much, much more. Or it might be much less: some fraction of that 1530 would have rejected immunization, and we know that with the Delta and other variances eventually more than 90% of Americans will acquire immunity either through vaccination or through... 15/
...getting a strong enough case of COVID-19 to trigger an immune response.

Odds are that, of those people, 15 are now dead. 15 people who would now be alive had Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett said “I don’t think that’s a great idea” when having a big party for... 16/
...her was mooted. Maybe it is more—maybe the chains of infection went to elderly Trumpists. Maybe it is less—maybe a good many of those who got infected would have gotten the disease anyway in the winter or the future, and that for many of the 15 it just cut their life... 17/
...short by 4 months or so. I can’t tell.

But 15 is the number to keep in your head. Amy Coney Barrett, I guarantee, does not think of herself as some ca. 1450 Mexica priestess watching her hench-priests sacrifice 15 people with obsidian knives on one of the pyramids of... 18/
...Tenochtitlan to celebrate her ascendancy to power. She does not light fifteen candles every Sunday, and pray on her knees that if any of those fifteen died unshriven that their sins descend upon her rather than upon them.

But maybe she should?

Slavitt and his guests’... 19/
...—all of their risk to you, risk to YOU, risk to you, risk to you—greatly discourages in his listeners the kind of systemic equilibrium thinking that we economists and you epidemiologists do as a matter of course. And we very badly need Americans to think that way:... 20/
...“vaccination is of very little risk to me, and may do a lot of good for others” is the way the thinking should go. And Slavitt’s vibe… discourages that.

I do not know why his podcast is doing this. Has the elite public health community decided that the best way to get... 21/
...as many people vaccinated as possible is to say that the reward for getting vaxxed is that you get to resume your normal life, and that whatever spread to the unvaxxed is produced by the vaxxed who do not social distance is outweighed by the reduction in spread because... 22/
...that carrot will induce more vaccination?

If so, show me the arithmetic.

If not, what are Slavitt and company thinking?

And there was a third reason I was let down. Scott Gotlieb was all about “Let’s not point fingers at Trump and his enablers! Let’s talk about the... 23/
...systemic bureaucratic defects that have also led to this… total clusterfuck!”

If every Scott Gotlieb who wants to preserve his standing among professional Republicans by “moving on” from Trump and his enablers would actually, you know, act like somebody with real... 24/
...ovaries, the country would be in a much better position than it is. And Slavitt did not challenge him, at all.

Sick, in an almost Cultural-Revolution sense…

braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

25/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brad DeLong: 'Live long, & prosper!'

Brad DeLong: 'Live long, & prosper!' Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @delong

17 Jul
braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

First:

This is, I think, 100% correct:

Ken White: ’1. The First Amendment and Section 230 let private companies like Twitter and Facebook choose how to moderate their sites. 2. American free speech rights are exceptional and protect a very large... 1/
...amount of speech many of us would agree is dangerous or harmful. That broad protection helps insulate speech from political and ideological urges to censor. 3. But the government has a leadership function as well as a governing one. Part of leadership is praising good... 2/
...behavior and condemning bad behavior, in hopes that people will do the right thing, without the coercion of law. 4. Facebook has a right to make money off of this alarming and deadly disinformation. But that doesn’t make it the right thing to do. Just as Americans have... 3/
Read 6 tweets
16 Jul
braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

First: Facebook as we know it needs to be shut down. But how do we replace it with something that does what it does without being a similar center for destructive grifting and brain-hacking?:

Brian Stelter: Authors of New Book Depict ‘Facebook’s... 1/
...Dilemma & Its Ugly Truth’: ‘“No Filter” author Sarah Frier, who was tasked with reviewing “An Ugly Truth” for The Times, says the book documents a clear pattern: “The social media behemoth does as little as possible to prevent disasters from happening, then feebly... 2/
...attempts to avoid blame and manage public appearances.” That’s why the back cover of the book cleverly lists the company’s apologias over the years: “I’m sorry.” “We need to do better.” “We need to do a better job.”... Frier wrote in her review.... “Frenkel and Kang...
Read 5 tweets
14 Jul
HAPPY BASTILLE DAY!!

braddelong.substack.com/p/document-cha…

"The French Government, after requesting the armistice, has now full knowledge of the conditions dictated by the enemy.

As a result, the French Army, Naval and Air Forces would be completely discharged, our weapons laid down... 1/
...the French territory occupied and the French Government under the control of Germany and Italy.

One can say that this armistice would not only result in capitulation but also in slavery.

However, a large number of French people do not accept the capitulation or... 2/
...the enslavement for reasons that are called honor, common sense and the higher interest of the Nation:

I am talking about honor! Indeed, France is committed to not laying down its weapons unless its allies agree to do so. As long as its allies continue fighting, our... 3/
Read 11 tweets
14 Jul
braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

First:

I have recently uncovered a substantial hole in my visualization of the Cosmic All:

I understand feudal politics: A network of connections, most vertical, some horizontal, overlapping with kin and marriage ties, allocating resources and... 1/
...support of various kinds. I understand Republican politics: an electorate plus local notables with their client networks Competing to win elections, after which magistrates with various forms of imperium take office and function within some agreed-upon legal structure... 2/
...in attempts to maintain and expand the coalition that elected them and also to accomplish what they think are good policy goals.

But suppose you have politics as the internal workings of a self-replacing and co-opting elite which organizes itself neither according to... 3/
Read 11 tweets
9 Jul
braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

First:

This, from Andy Slavitt, who was one of the most positive voices in the rolling COVID-19 plague discussion over the past year and a half—well, it stopped me in my tracks. Slavitt said: Delta “is twice as infectious. Fortunately… we… have... 1/
...a tool that stops… Delta… in its tracks… vaccine”.

That does not make much sense to me.

I am told that the way to bet is that Delta as has an R[0] of 8, that mRNA vaccines are 80% protective, and further that they are 80% protective against death conditional upon... 2/
...your getting a case of the plague. And I am told that that is a somewhat cautious bet—that it could turn out that mRNA vaccines are in fact significantly more protective than these “80%” still semi-guesses…

But let’s run with what I have been told…

80% protective... 3/
Read 16 tweets
8 Jul
braddelong.substack.com/p/briefly-note…

This—Gregory Clark: The Secret History of the Industrial Revolution—is an extremely interesting but ultimately, I think, not fully sustainable paper. In it, Greg Clark does the Greg-thing: taking an unsustainable position, turning all his ... 1/
...intelligence and industry to sustaining it, and getting remarkably far. His unsustainable position is that the British Industrial Revolution was not the try of modern economic growth—the 2%/year economy-wide improvements in lab or productivity broadly distributed... 2/
...over sectors that we have seen since 1870—but rather the last two of the post-Medieval discrete localized and sector-specific industrial advances. Steam and textile machinery are therefore classified as things like the caravel, printing. It was only, Clark claims... 3/
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(