My favored immigration policy for Italy would be something like picking 4 or 5 favored states for a guest worker -> "green card" (no expiry, family) -> citizenship path. It would include overhaul of the school system to accomodate these languages.
Each national community would be focused around 4 or 5 cities with schools offering a spectrum of original language-> italian instruction, with the ultimate goal of producing dual fluency.
Each community would get facilitations to build their own "Piana degli Albanesi" somewhere in the countryside, to produce whatever traditional agricultural goods can be adapted to our climate, and to serve as cultural, spiritual, and social center for their community.
Each community would also get facilitations for importing goods from their home countries, and for investing money back home (their own savings, or act as agents/facilitators for Italian investors).
One of the side quests on this would be to ensure that Rome has excellent air connections to many African capitals, which would set it up to act as a hub for Europeans going there, and Africans coming to Europe.
The objective would be to focus on 4 or 5 bilateral relationships for the first decade or so, and then use lessons learned to explore others. The idea would be that many more people would come to learn, earn, and study, than actually stay long term.
The individual rights of immigrants would be ironclad, but the partnerships with the national governments would be contingent on free and fair elections, respect of human rights, etc

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrea Matranga

Andrea Matranga Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andreamatranga

21 Jul
Fun aside, we are indeed at a pretty important turning point, in terms of the space race. In a few years we will start seeing pictures we've never seen before, like rows of orbital launch vehicles lined up for assembly or awaiting a launch window. ImageImage
Ten years. I am agnostic as to whether this will pay off in the grander scheme of things, but a number of people with mind boggling resources have decided they want to build a bunch of rockets, so whatever else may happen, we're going to be seeing bunches of rockets.
Something that comes out very strongly out of the history of aviation, is that propulsion is usually the critical step, so if you want to see who's ahead look at the engine technologies.
Read 10 tweets
20 Jul
There's a famous story that Feynman tells in one of his memoirs, of the measuring of the charge of the electron (I think, @notanastronomer ?). It's a bit embarrassing. The first pioneering measurement was say 86% of the true value, which is actually quite good.
But then the progression went something like 89%, 92%, 95%, 97%, 102%, until finally it converged on the true value. The reason its embarrassing is because you would expect the values to jump on BOTH sides of the actual value, if these were unbiased estimates.
So what seems to have happened is that after the first measurement, whenever a team was making another, if the value was say 120% (very far from the first one), the scientists would suspect they had made a mistake somewhere, check all the vacuum lines, calibrate the balance, etc
Read 13 tweets
20 Jul
My space billionaire-skeptical takes will probably not age well. Oh but to have seen us in our prime!
This is essentially orthogonal to the merits themselves of private space exploration. Think of how many people say "yes WWII was awful, but we got radar and pressurized aircraft and computers out of it.
And well, Apollo. The nature of technology, and more generally knowledge, is that once it exists, others will build on it. And once they do, yhe tendency will be to perceive favorably those blocke further down in the pyramid, and those that layed them
Read 4 tweets
13 Jul
Back in my Civ playing days,I thought it would be better if there was no "research" per se, but rather you would discover new technologies randomly, but more likely if you did more of certain activities.
In particular say you could build ships object with three levels of quality: basic (does the job but falls apart quicker), medium, and improved. In particular the improved ships would be better than medium, but so expensive as to not be cost effective for most purposes.
BUT building improved ships would drastically increase the likelihood of discovering the next big sea tech.

So, hey, maybe the billionaire space race will be as transformative as personal computers or refrigeration. Still seems a bit of a gamble as a society.
Read 7 tweets
13 Jul
I think part of the (anti- vs CRT) divide could be spanned with an analogy with tourist sites. Some places have great natural or historic significance, but have also dangerous features. We don't wipe them off the face of the map, but we do ensure that dangers are clearly marked.
Take Columbus. He was clearly a wretched man, as his conduct towards indigenous and Spanish alike proved beyond a shadow of a doubt. He was also an awful navigator who would have died with all his crew if there hadn't happened to be an entire continent at the right place.
There isn't really much in him to hold as an example for future generations... "Be wrong, but get lucky, then extremely cruel".

But for other figures, where their achievements were in unrelated fields, and the stains on their legacy largely incidental,...
Read 7 tweets
13 Jul
I understand the logic of the officer/enlisted division, but it's becoming increasingly at odds with the norms of western society. It overlapped perfectly with society circa 1700, gentry or can write a sentence -> officer, commoners -> enlisted. But we've come a ways since then.
It's possible that the fundamental issue is that a rigid separation between officer and enlisted is simply optimal for warfighting, and medieval/early modern society molded itself on its requirements.
Now we managed to shift society towards more egalitarian norms, but we still need to preserve the distinction in the military because it's just the right way to do it. But if the societal division was preexisting, we might be dragging around a vestigial organizational form...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(