I wanted to take a moment to look at why the various government rorts are such a concern. I'm talking about the Sports grants and the Carparks and the Community Development grants...
The exact amount of money that goes to make up these various funds is difficult to make out. In part it's because successive Budgets have allocated money into various discretionary funds. In part because it's unclear at times how much money has been allocated or spent.
But first, let's look at how these things are supposed to work.
1. A government department - Infrastructure, for example - will publish a list of grant criteria and invite submissions from the relevant groups. Councils, state governments, community groups etc.
2. All submissions that meet the grant criteria are assessed and rated. Projects are funded down the list until all the money has been allocated.
3. The Minister in charge might make changes, but it's expected they provide (good) reasons for doing so.
4. That final list of projects is funded.
Now, because each project had to think through what they needed and put forward a case, projects are generally ready to proceed when funding approval is granted.
The process is transparent, and money goes to the most worthy projects.
Now, it's important to contrast this process with election promises. These fall into a very different category in which projects might be put forward by a candidate as an inducement to vote for them. "Here's what I'll do for you if I win election."
We expect election promises to be both partisan and parochial. We also recognise that they're contingent on the candidate (and their party) winning the election.
What we've seen in the past two years or so is a complete subjugation of the process of allocating funding based on need. The current government hasn't just blurred the line between the business of government and electioneering; they're thrown it away.
This is effectively corruption. Public money is being used for political purposes and the sums are vast - hundreds of millions of dollars. What's worse, having gotten away with (there are yet to be any consequences), the government is becoming more brazen.
A number of senior cabinet figures have, just this week, defended this misuse of public money, and shown clear intention to do so again.
This is why we need a Federal Integrity commission - an independent body capable of investigating these acts...
It's why the @AustDems have been advocating for an overhaul of our parliamentary salaries and benefits, political funding, and implement a national integrity commission
I wanted to dive into this topic to add some context around why the proposed reductions to JobSeeker and JobKeeper make little sense when you take into account the state of the economy as a whole, and the way businesses think...
Let’s start with the economy. We have been experiencing a slowing in the Australian economy for the past six or so years, culminating in the recession coinciding with the economic fallout of our health response to the pandemic. (The recession wasn’t *caused* by the pandemic.)
When you read about Morrison’s gas-fired economic recovery today, remember the following:
* gas is not a low-emission energy source, and is dirtier than coal when methane leakage is factored in;
* AEMO has a roadmap that shows we can replace gas with renewables by 2025…
* renewable energy projects create *more* jobs than a gas project would & and delivers the emission-reduction we need;
* gas-fired power will take years to build and bring online, by which time we could have built out a 100% renewables grid.
* this plan benefits gas producers...
* we already have plenty of gas, and we pay more for it domestically than we export it for. More gas isn’t the answer; it’s to stop letting gas producers screw over local markets.
A lot of people are going to be experiencing remote working for the first time over the coming weeks. So here are some observations/tips for effective collaboration when you aren't all in the same room...
1) You can't rely on non-verbal cues in the same way as you do (consciously or unconsciously) when you're in the same room with other people; 2) Due to latency inherent in the technology, it can be harder for people to identify natural breaks in the discussion and when to speak
3) Don't be afraid to have short conversations - audio or video. It is easy to slide into the habit of communicating in writing with people who aren't with us. 4) Be deliberate in inviting comment from everyone individually instead of a general 'Any questions?'...
Some thoughts I’ve been having about the state of Australia. Here’s a short, incomplete list of things we need:
1) We need a broad-based commitment, from all levels of government and industry, to decarbonise our economy. As quickly as we can. 2) We need a treaty with our indigenous peoples and a true path to reconciliation.
3) We need to address the gaps in our taxation system that allow large corporations and rich individuals to receive subsidies for their profit-making ventures, and avoid paying a fair share of tax;
I’m finding the threads on Northam interesting. My years at university were transformative for me in many ways, but in particular they helped me shed much of the racism and sexism with which I’d been raised. Me at 18 was a very different person to me at 21...
The racism and sexism of white, working class Australia in the 1970s and early 80s. When we routinely used racial epithets and ‘women’s work’ was still very much a thing...
(My mother still assumes someone else does my laundry. And if she sees me doing it believes it to be a failure on my wife’s part. Same goes with most domestic chores.)...
It took a lot of work to recognize those attitudes for what they were and change them.