How many rounds(भांवर) are right during marriages? 4 or 7
In Gujrat we have 4 rounds. 7 rounds are quite popular in UP,Himanchal,bihar and many other states✨
Does the concept of tradition applies here?
Shastras too falls under tradition. A tradition which does not go against श्रुति-स्मृति is considered right others are wrong.
+
A tradition that does not mentioned in shruti smritis(as मंगलसूत्र) is right because it contradicts none.
पारस्कर ग्रह्यसूत्र of the shukla yajurveda which is very famous among pandits states:-
चतुर्थं शूर्पकुष्ठया सर्वाल्लाजानावपति भगाय स्वाहेति ।
4th time all the लाजा's{Kheels} should be sacrificed in fire then they do the last parikrama as said in 7th sutra
The हरिहर and Gadadhar Bhashya of the 7th sutra states:- " ततः समाचारात्तूष्णीं चतुर्थं परिक्रमणं वधूवरौ कुरुतः
Complete the fourth Round for sadachara.
Which means 3 rounds+1 round for achara,।
Bhagvan Ram and ma sita did 3 parikramas.
ईदृशे वर्तमाने तु तूर्योद्दष्टनिनादिते | त्रिरग्निं ते परिक्रम्य ऊहुर्भार्या महौजसः ।। ( Balkanda 73/39 )
In #मानवग्रह्यसूत्र 1.10 we have the clear statement:- चतु: परिणयति. Bride and Groom complete the parikrama 4 times.
In laghu ashvalambha smriti Vivaha prakrana/15 too:-विधिरेष विवाहस्य प्रत्याहुतिप्रदक्षिणम् । मन्त्रोऽर्यमणं वरुणं पूषण लाजहोमके ।।
3 mantras are defined for 3 ahutis and then one round for each ahuti is described. Which means 3 round with mantra and 1 can be done without it.
The unnecessary relation of rounds with #सप्तपदी and the "7 life means 7 rounds" has given rise to such traditions. सप्तपदी takes place after rounds not with it.
TVs and others are responsible for this too,they have also maligned the tradition at many houses.
With wrong vidhis marriages will fail without a doubt.
Rayta science logy dot com. Someone was saying "there must be 8 rounds to promote equality"😆
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Rgveda Shakala samhita the total number of letters is 4,32,000. Rishis have calculated every word of Veda so the knowledge can be passed without a single letter getting lost.
Similar is the case with the tradition of interpretation. You can notice it in DarshanaShastras too. In Vedanta the debate about what is the meaning of अथ in the sutra अथातो ब्रह्मजिज्ञासा has taken many books to explain.
Interpretation of vedas require much effort.
Durgacharya has written {meaning in image
"Women didn't used to cover their breasts before British Rule" All this is Victorian Morality
Traditions, customs and dresses may vary within communities and region. But you can't say that "women didn't used to cover the upper part of body". There are different types of clothes mentioned to serve the purpose.
All of us agree that Kalidasa is Pre Mughal, Pre-British and maybe pre to any type pf cultural invasion.
For a second imagine all these stories to be true(in the way he has represented).
anecdotes cannot be against Vedas. By saying that the "meaning of Vedas should be taken from Itihasa and Puranas" we mean that history and Puranas are only for Vedas. Not against it.
If the method is derived from the Anecdote going against Veda or Smriti. So Due to the stability of the fame of Ravana,till date who abducted someone's wife such method can be derived :-
"कीर्तिकामः परदारानपहरेत् (the person who desires fame has to abduct the wife)"
But it's not derived because it's against Veda and Smritis. Therefore, one should imagine that the anecdotes holds no authority to determine what is dharma and adharma by themselves...
😂 Real Ramayan, Lol who takes these people seriously
In the very first page see how ill logic "Rama was a human not an avatara" this is the propaganda they are promoting and Hindus will be fine with this.
Also in this "pure ramayana "Hanumanji used monoplane ✈️ to reach lanka