@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
π over n
π÷n
.
Any point has two points, the point of stability, π÷π, and the point of instability, π÷n.
.
π over n
π÷n
.
Any point has two points, the point of stability, π÷π, and the point of instability, π÷n.
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Most people don't like to think of π as method of measurement, and especially don't like to think of π as being treated algebraic,
none the less
(√π × √C) ^ (1/2)
is the standard mathematical formula of drawing a square that has the same area as circle.
Most people don't like to think of π as method of measurement, and especially don't like to think of π as being treated algebraic,
none the less
(√π × √C) ^ (1/2)
is the standard mathematical formula of drawing a square that has the same area as circle.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
π is treated as algebraic when squaring the circle
.
a right angle triangle
with side A as being √113
with side B as being √242
And C, the hypotenuse, √355
.
π is treated as algebraic when squaring the circle
.
a right angle triangle
with side A as being √113
with side B as being √242
And C, the hypotenuse, √355
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
√C in this case √355
becomes the base line measurement of one side of a four sided square
.
and then can be used to calculate the length needed for the radius of circle that has a defined area that will exactly match the area defined by the square
.
√C in this case √355
becomes the base line measurement of one side of a four sided square
.
and then can be used to calculate the length needed for the radius of circle that has a defined area that will exactly match the area defined by the square
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
It is extremely unlikely that current particle physicist will switch their measurement standards to a π based standard, none the less, as the field of geometry expands out to the general masses, individuals will begin to study particle physics with π as standard of measurement
It is extremely unlikely that current particle physicist will switch their measurement standards to a π based standard, none the less, as the field of geometry expands out to the general masses, individuals will begin to study particle physics with π as standard of measurement
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Measurements of things is based upon laws of geometry, and is not based upon any number theory.
.
Measurements of things is based upon laws of geometry, and is not based upon any number theory.
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
It is the laws of Geometry that allows us to use only a straight line and a compass
that can draw
a square that has the exact area the same size as a circle
.
It is the laws of Geometry that allows us to use only a straight line and a compass
that can draw
a square that has the exact area the same size as a circle
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Please note that one diagram is mislabeled, with a number of √244, it should be correctly labeled as √242
.
Do the math and the radius of the circle ends up being something like 10.630099999
.
Please note that one diagram is mislabeled, with a number of √244, it should be correctly labeled as √242
.
Do the math and the radius of the circle ends up being something like 10.630099999
.
https://twitter.com/art32pazuru/status/1416269425582305287?s=19
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
For me, personally, I can readly see that laws of physics will be rewritten using a dirivative of the numerical standard of π as being the standards of stability and instability within and around any object.
.
For me, personally, I can readly see that laws of physics will be rewritten using a dirivative of the numerical standard of π as being the standards of stability and instability within and around any object.
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
The current method of atomic structure isn't accurate enough for modern physics endeavors because
.
The current method of atomic structure isn't accurate enough for modern physics endeavors because
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
... √0 has no length in outer space, ...
.
any numerical calculation based upon a Cartesian coordinate system that uses (0,0) as a base is an invalid calculation because it is using the imaginative i as a form of reality,
Reality is one, not zero
.
... √0 has no length in outer space, ...
.
any numerical calculation based upon a Cartesian coordinate system that uses (0,0) as a base is an invalid calculation because it is using the imaginative i as a form of reality,
Reality is one, not zero
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Yeah, it seems impossible and improbable that the atomic structures of the elements will be remeasured, none the less
π over π
π÷π
is stability
π over n
π÷n
is unstable
.
Yeah, it seems impossible and improbable that the atomic structures of the elements will be remeasured, none the less
π over π
π÷π
is stability
π over n
π÷n
is unstable
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
It is likely Korea will keep the plasma generator, Europe will lose CERN
π÷π is stable
π÷n is unstable
.
It is likely Korea will keep the plasma generator, Europe will lose CERN
π÷π is stable
π÷n is unstable
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
This allows the west to become freed from the zero fetishes of their predecessors.
.
This allows the west to become freed from the zero fetishes of their predecessors.
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Once geometry is reestablished as foundation, then truth becomes both beauty and measurements.
.
Once geometry is reestablished as foundation, then truth becomes both beauty and measurements.
.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
Yes, it's difficult to realize that the west will be forced back into Plato's Theory of Forms, but it's also interesting to know we now know of fractals, the circle, the square, the triangle are two dimension, but the fractal pushes it into the three dimensional world.
Yes, it's difficult to realize that the west will be forced back into Plato's Theory of Forms, but it's also interesting to know we now know of fractals, the circle, the square, the triangle are two dimension, but the fractal pushes it into the three dimensional world.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger It will probably be a thousand years or more before we decide to redo the measurements of atomic structure of the elements, none the less, it is inevitable.
@fridaysimon @AleksKissinger .
In brief, every point has two points, the point of stability and the point of unstablity.
geometry is the method of discovering and measuring the forces that govern the moving motion of things and of all things.
In brief, every point has two points, the point of stability and the point of unstablity.
geometry is the method of discovering and measuring the forces that govern the moving motion of things and of all things.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
