Fun facts courtesy of Fauci:
By mid-Feb 2020 an “ad hoc” group of experts “informally led by Jeremy Farrar” had been meeting to look at “coronavirus sequences to . . . determine the evolutionary origin.” Also per Fauci, this sort of thing “is not [his] area of expertise.” LOL 1/
Fortunately, Farrar decided to include Fauci in this “ad hoc” group (despite admitted lack of expertise), and now we have his (heavily redacted) emails. (Thanks FOIA!) Farrar’s first act as informal leader (that we know of) was to organize a teleconference on Feb. 1, 2020. 3/
“Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared until agreement on next steps.”
Bold opening statement, especially considering it went to top public health officials from the US & UK (Fauci & Vallance) as C-19 was spreading rapidly within both. 4/
See image below for the agenda. Note the initials of the person giving the “introduction, focus and desired outcomes” and the “summary and next steps”.

This “informal leader” clearly has some muscle.

*Googles “Jeremy Farrar Wellcome Trust”*

Before the call, Farrar sends another email to the group [pages 3172-3173 of the Buzzfeed Fauci email dump]:

“Kristen [Kristian?] and Eddie have shared this and will talk through it on the call. Thank you.

Hope it will help frame the discussions.” 6/
What did Kristian Andersen and Eddie Holmes shared with the group that Farrar hoped would frame the discussion?

The name of the file Farrar attached appears at the bottom of the email [page 3174, Fauci dump]:

“Coronavirus sequence comparison[1].pdf”

In an earlier Tweet, I mentioned UK Chief Scientific Advisor Patrick Vallance was also part of this “ad hoc” group. Well, @WhatDoTheyKnow was able to obtain his emails via FOI request, and here’s where it gets interesting… 8/
The Vallance emails, though heavily redacted, reveal an interesting reply to Farrar’s email with the coronavirus sequence comparison file that was either omitted or redacted in the Fauci emails.

“We need to talk about the backbone too, not just the insert?”

Odd question to put to a group of scientists convened to look at “bat, pangolin, and human coronavirus sequences to try to determine an evolutionary origin”, no?
Sounds more like something you’d ask a group that understands you’re dealing with an infectious chimeric virus. 10/
It’s worth noting that only a couple of hours earlier Kristian Andersen told Fauci that some features of the coronavirus sequences “(potentially) look engineered” and that he, Eddie, Bob, and Mike “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” 11/
Of the 13 scientists invited to join the call, we know that at least four found the virus inconsistent with evolutionary theory, including the Andersen and Holmes, who prepared the sequence comparison and sent to the group before the call. 12/
So it’s not surprising that whatever sequences were being compared and discussed on the call would include sequences that had been engineered. Whatever “desired outcomes” were presented on the call must have been persuasive because they’ve been zoonosis zealots ever since. 13/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Tyler Cardon

Tyler Cardon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TyCardon

21 Jul
Fauci committed perjury. @randpaul called him out, citing NIH-funded gain-of-function work by Ralph Baric, Shi, et al., in which a synthetic infectious SHC014 recombinant virus was created.
Fauci: "ThAtS nOt GoF!"
Ralph Baric: "It was actually a chimeric gain-of-function virus."
The idea that the Baric, Shi, et al. paper does not include GoF research is laughable. Fauci’s just betting no one will actually read the damn thing, and he’s probably right.
What are the odds it was Fauci himself that saved the pdf file as “Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function” before attaching it and sending along to Hugh? 👀
Read 5 tweets
20 Jul
@CalebJHull Fauci sent Hugh Auchincloss the same paper @RandPaul referenced at the hearing today via email on Feb 1, 2020. The name of the attachment: “Baric, Shi et al - Nature medicine - SARS Gain of function.pdf” 1/
@CalebJHull @RandPaul Auchincloss’s reply a few hours later is also telling. “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH.” 2/
@CalebJHull @RandPaul Neither Fauci nor Auchincloss seem concerned that the experiments with the chimeric SH014 recombinant viruses had been wrongly classified as “gain of function” in the paper, and no corrections to the Acknowledgments section were ever made. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!