This is the best documentary I've seen in years. Director @gocjhunt strikes a perfect balance between playful mockery and grim realism in assessing the dangerous persistence of white supremacist mythology-as-history.
I didn't learn about the existence of this mythology-as-history in high school; in fact the first time I ever came across the idea was a few weeks ago. Suddenly things made a lot more sense.
This is followed by an explanation of the crucial role played by women in the United Daughters of the Confederacy, chiefly in institutionalizing the Lost Cause narrative in school curricula, some of which survived through the '70s
Do you see the parallels to our current CRT moral panic?
Now, check out the long-term epistemological effects of growing up steeped in this ideology. All I could think about when watching this clip was all the experiences I have had being swarmed by Rufo and Lindsay stans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The left does not have an explanation for Asian American achievement from a critical race theory lens." The left also lacks an explanation of the pancreas from a critical race theory lens. Theories have specific purposes.
Oh GOd. You'll never guess who authored the foreword. Rhymes with Shmimmy Momcepts.
According to @ConceptualJames, CRT accuses Asian Americans of being "model minorities," "white-adjacent," or just "white." And CRT alleges that Asians "push to succeed" bc of their anti-Blackness and desire to maintain their white (or yellow (Jesus, dude)) privilege
Holy shit. Rufo is either actually remarkably stupid or has even less faith in his audience’s will to think for themselves than I thought.
Crenshaw is lamenting this fact, not endorsing it. This is beyond obvious from reading the essay.
At the very least this tweet reveals Rufo did not subject his interpretation to even the slightest amount of questioning. This reading of Crenshaw would entail that Shelby Steele, Charles Murray, and Bo Winegard are critical race theorists.
Seriously, read the article. Crenshaw (@sandylocks) does not mince words. Her observations ring even truer today:
“Make no mistake about it: We are in a full-scale race-baiting campaign. It is well-organized, and it could be effective if we fail to mine the lessons [of history]”
Crenshaw getting to the heart of the issue: ignorance. It is this ignorance that engenders complacency as the norm for otherwise progressive people when it comes to racial justice in the US.
And that ignorance is no accident. Those who benefit most under the status quo have absolutely no interest in teaching the next generation facts about their nation's history that might lead them to endorse a radical restructuring of the socioeconomic order.
And this must all be situated within the reform-retrenchment dialectic of our history. Antiracist efforts are demonized in order to justify White anti-democratic control.
It’s plain. Today’s attacks on critical race theory aren’t meant to rebut its main arguments. They’re meant to paint it with such broad brushstrokes that any basic effort to reckon with the causes and impact of racism in our society can be demonized and dismissed.
It’s true: I made a mistake. On Twitter dot com! So I issued a correction. The point Wokal is taking me to task for here is arguably the most inconsequential thing in the entire thread. Great place to start! 🧵
What Rufo wrote is a blatant falsehood. It amounts to “Commie Crenshaw says White bougie Black prole lulz.”
What Crenshaw claims in the excerpt is simple: both CRT and Marxism begin by appealing to a social ontology which is obscured by that society’s dominant self-conception.