a) the impetus for the investigation is sedition on social media.
b) the investigation starts with a guy named Adam Fox, who, following a meeting in Ohio, reaches out to a militia that has already been infiltrated by the FBI.
According to the Buzzfeed article, the affidavit is backwards.
Buzzfeed’s story starts w/ the militia, called the Wolverine Watchmen. Dan, a veteran, joins it blindly and is alarmed: his new buddies aren’t just interested in fun gun stuff but in potentially killing cops.
Dan tells a cop buddy, who alerts the FBI, who ask Dan to become and informant within the group.
When a protest occupies the Michigan Capitol, the Wolverine Watchmen go along. Dan alerts the FBI, whereupon the cops stand down and let them do it.
Adam Fox, focus of the FBI affidavit, is also at that protest. He doesn’t know the Wolverine Watchmen yet.
Joe Morrison, one of the WWs, is invited to a militia meeting in Dublin, Ohio. He does not go.
Adam Fox, also invited, does.
The meeting sponsor is an FBI informant.
This is the crucial bit: Joe Morrison decides to hook up the Wolverines with Adam Fox, who has radicalized to the extent of wanting to seize the state Capitol and take hostages.
Except *Morrison hadn’t been at the meeting where the FBI obviously had set up him and Fox to meet.*
So here is the crucial question, which doesn’t seem to be answered in Buzzfeed or in the affidavit: *how did Adam Fox — who fantasized about raising 200 men to seize the Capitol — know who the Wolverine Watchmen even were to reach out to them?*
Who connected him & Joe Morrison?
The FBI pretty clearly set up that initial meeting to connect as many people they were investigating as possible under the kind auspices of an informant host, and then see what possibilities for set-ups that offered them so they could pick the most promising ones to roll up.
Also interesting sausage-making: it’s pretty clear they wrote the affidavit’s story of the investigation retroactively. If somebody else had come out of that meeting as a contender, they would have written beginning of the investigation with a different protagonist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Because replies are at multiple levels, here are screencaps of the full, very interesting exchange between Elon Musk and Pete Buttigieg, with timestamps 1/
I always complain that movie & TV sets these days are too aspirational lifestyle
e.g. RED DRAGON (2002) vs. MANHUNTER (1986) — Ed Norton & William Petersen as same dude w/ same job in same story; compare their houses (MH left, RD right) — but I rewatched & it's more than that
RED DRAGON doesn’t just have sets that are bigger or fancier or more expensive: even its spaces with few people are deeper
for example, this police briefing scene, with shots of the speakers and of the crowd (MANHUNTER left, RED DRAGON right)
here is another: the bad guy’s living room (MANHUNTER left, RED DRAGON right)
final verdict on TRUE DETECTIVE S4: just ok, a bit clunky, and the reveal doesn't work on a character level (ie, motivations don't make sense bc ppl's actions require access to information they have no reason to be privy to)
so it got me thinking: what makes TRUE DETECTIVE work?
on my recent TRUE DETECTIVE rewatch I started making notes about what I felt the essence of TRUE DETECTIVE was and what made it work
not a formula, but a vibe and ground rules that I would look to if for some reason HBO asked me of all people to create a season of TRUE DETECTIVE
or, put another way: of the stuff that made TRUE DETECTIVE: S1 compelling TV, what can you replicate without making it feel like a retread?
reminder that when the Gaetz venmo scandal was wall to wall journos were swearing the guy who got arrested would imminently drop indisputable proof that Gaetz was banging a minor
that dude never dropped it, couldn’t deliver Gaetz to prosecutors, and went to prison
I think it’s fair to say that everybody on both sides of the aisle was prepared to believe Gaetz did sleazy stuff, but wanted to see the goods
and the goods never dropped when they could have saved an involved party from prison, so I expect this is bs
here is an amazing anecdote I heard from somebody who has been in Cameroon
it is about money
or rather, the lack of it
petty corruption is *extremely* common in Cameroon; if you are a foreigner (or of a different local ethnicity than the officer) cops will straight-up demand a bribe to let you move on
in US currency:
typical sidewalk bribe: $3.50
typical speeding ticket bribe: $20
the government is doing a poor job of rooting this out, in part because they are all too busy collecting bribes
so busy, in fact, they have neglected a different and more hilarious problem
the media using these goons as a club to hammer normal righties does not mean that that is their most important function as far as they (the goons) are concerned
do not mistake what concerns you for the function; this ain't about you
rule of thumb when you're looking at radical groups is: figure out which groups in question you're dealing with, and here you're dealing with a couple different but aligned ones
they're called a) Blood Tribe and b) Goyim Defense League