A driver last week challenged my assertion that motorists and their passengers suffer half of all head injuries.
It was a fact that I’d carried in my head for years, but I wanted a source.
So I checked, but here in UK there are no ...
2/ routinely collected statistics on the types of injury suffered by different types of road user.
The best I could find was an old webpage on the Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation but few if any of the original studies are online.
It says:
:: The road users most at risk ...
from head injury are pedestrians and young drivers. (Morgan 1988; Ramet and Vallet, 1987).
:: In England, Scotland and Wales, six times more pedestrians and 18 times more motor vehicle occupants suffer lethal head injuries than cyclists. Pedestrians and motor vehicle...
4/ ...occupants also suffer more lethal injuries to the abdomen and thorax. (Kennedy, 1996; DfT, 1)
:: Children are 2.6 times more likely to suffer head injury through jumping and falling than by cycling. (O'Rourke, Costello, Yelland and Stuart, 1987) ...
5/ :: More than 99% of head injuries seen by UK hospitals do not involve cyclists who have been on the road (Derived from OPCS 1 and Thornhill et al, 2000)
:: Helmets for motorists are much more effective than those for cyclists and more beneficial than seat belts, interior ...
6/ padding or air bags. Their potential for reducing injury is 17 times greater than that of cycle helmets. (McLean et al, 1998; Kennedy, 1996)
Perhaps it is time that these figures were brought up to date.
One interesting paper I did find was the Prevalence of Bicycle ....
7 Injuries in Large Urban Hospital (2019), which states: "Of all helmeted patients, significant head trauma seen in 35%. This was like non-helmeted group where 34% had significant head trauma." ...
8/ Wear a helmet if you want to but please don’t evangelise to those of us who choose not to wear one.
One person nagging me to wear a helmet a year ago has led to a year of angst for me. The result is that I've cycled less, and even considered giving it up. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@Kevin_O2L I agree it is complex but your your simplification is misleading *and* wrong. The president of the European Parliament is elected from MEPs (whom we vote for) every 30 months; the president of the European Council (made up of democratically elected heads of state) is elected ...
@Kevin_O2L every 30 months; the president of the Commission is appointed by the Council, with the European Parliament’s approval; finally, the presidency of the Council of the European Union is held in turn by a member state, not a person.
In the UK, we don’t have a direct say in who ...
@Kevin_O2L is PM (May’s first term, Gordon Brown) but we may vote for a party they lead at the time of the election; we don’t have a direct say in the people who form the cabinet (which, after all, is government).
At county level we don’t have a say in who is council leader or who ...
Thread: This story in today's @thesundaytimes raises ethical questions. It's about car drivers and passengers in some makes of popular small car being more exposed to diesel soot and other toxins thanks to flawed filters in the air con. thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/f… (£) 1/14
The three cars named as being particularly poor are the Ford Fiesta, VW Polo and Toyota C-HR, while the Mercedes H-class scored highly. The Toyota filter was worst, removing just 1% of particles compared with the Merc’s 90%.