Adam Jentleson Profile picture
Jul 22, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The question people ask on this and similar polls is: what is Sinema doing? Is this a politically necessary or super=savvy ploy to hold her seat, one that justifies the big sacrifices to Biden's agenda on voting rights and much else? Let's take a look. 1/
If the goal of Sinema's rightward gambit is to be popular in AZ, the results are meh. She comes in at 44% and net +2 approval among Arizonans - an OK number since it's narrowly positive, but lower than Biden (50%, +2) and especially Kelly's net +11.
One clear effect of her rightward lurch is to severely harm her support among Dems. Being barely above 50% with your own party is not a great place to be, especially in our polarized era. Compare her approval among Dems (54%, +13) to Kelly's (85%, +76) and Biden's (94%, +89).
If Sinema has sacrificed support among Dems, she must be making up for it with independents, right? Wrong. Here, again, she trails Kelly. This gets to the cost/benefit question: Sinema is blocking Biden's agenda, but still has a lower approval among indies than Kelly, who is not.
The place where Sinema outperforms is with Republicans. But what is that worth? In a head to head, Republicans will vote for the Republican. Even if a candidate only has to win ~10%, Kelly has 21% with Rs while also enjoying much stronger numbers with Dems & indies. Seems better.
Sinema's decision to obstruct Biden's agenda has left her open to a primary challenge. But what's truly remarkable is that she has not just left herself vulnerable to the far left. She has left herself vulnerable to anyone who runs as a Democrat supporting the Democratic agenda.
Let's get to the question: what is Sinema doing? Do those relatively high approval numbers with GOPers mean she's going to switch parties? Probably not. While her numbers among Rs are reasonably high for a Dem, they are too low to win a GOP primary. Compare to Ducey, for example.
What about running as an indie? Maybe. But that's hard to do when your overall favorability rating is underwater (-4), and when you fail to achieve majority favs with any faction. Also, as stated above, her performance among indies is underwhelming, and lags far behind Kelly.
Another explanation, suggested by her “fuck off” photo, is that Sinema doesn’t care. Fair enough. But it’d also be fair for donors, grassroots leaders, and other supporters to ask why she is sacrificing Biden’s agenda and making it harder for Dems to hold the majority in 2022.
Clearly, Sinema’s gambit is not necessary for her politics. Kelly is in stronger standing, which he has achieved without blocking Biden’s agenda. It’d be entirely reasonable for supporters & donors to ask why she’s sacrificing priorities like voting rights for no good reason.
Sinema’s gambit is also hurting Dem efforts to hold the majority. Blocking S1/HR4 keeps the playing field tilted towards Rs. Without filibuster reform, other key priories won’t pass either. And Rs are using Sinema’s rightward shift to attack Kelly as a radical. Bad! And for what?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Jentleson

Adam Jentleson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AJentleson

Nov 14, 2024
A quick 🧵 on what seems to be Trump's plan to obliterate the Senate's advise and consent responsibility so that he can recess appoint his cabinet, or at least those members who lack the votes to get confirmed by the Senate. 1/
Remember that only the Senate confirms nominees and judges. The House has no role in the confirmation process itself.

The Constitution allows POTUS to make recess appointments, ie to put nominees in place without Senate confirmation. In the past this has been used sparingly. 2/
For recess appointments to happen, the Senate has to be in recess. For a decade or so, the Senate has not been going into recess when it adjourns but pro forma sessions, which can last up to 3 days. Long story, it goes back to Rs blocking Obama from doing recess appointments. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Nov 9, 2024
Early taxonomy of responsibility:

1. Joe Biden’s profoundly arrogant decision to run again

2. The strategy by groups and their funders to push Harris to take politically disastrous positions in the 2020 primary, thus leaving the people they claim to fight for worse off
Moving forward, we can’t do anything about the first problem but we can do something about the second.
Gadflies need to reckon with the fact that the people they claim to fight for are worse off because of their efforts.

Winning elections is how you change policy.

The price of Trump winning will be paid by vulnerable people, not professional activists.

Read 7 tweets
Nov 3, 2024
a quick🧵 on why this selzer poll of Iowa (???) matters, translated for normal people, i.e. those who don't remember where they were when she released her poll of the 2008 democratic primary (me, not normal: i was in the edwards HQ in chapel hill, all love to my JRE08 peeps ✊)
the reason political obsessives revere @jaselzer is that she is uncannily accurate, and has the courage to publish results that do not herd - and which usually end up proving prophetic. her record speaks for itself:
@jaselzer while IA has not been in play for dems at the presidential level since 2008, selzer polls still tend to predict neighboring states such as WI and maybe in this cycle, NE. and/because...
Read 5 tweets
Oct 24, 2024
alright here's a 🧵on why i'm feeling optimistic and tips on surviving the next two weeks. take it or leave it.
first i want to endorse @danpfeiffer's take - YOU have agency. if twitter is stressing you out, log off. i like and respect @NateSilver538 but his model is not going to tell us anything by E day that it doesn't tell us today. the race models as a tossup.
but unlike nate my gut says harris is going to win. here's why.

let's starts with the fact that the race is a tossup. that's a GOOD thing compared to where we were a few months ago. in july, we were on track to lose. instead of a death march, harris has us in a position to win.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 13, 2022
While it's true that you can't mint candidates who look like Fetterman, the reason his message resonated was that the campaign was so deeply in tune with PA, including knowing that the NJ attack would resonate in ways that many political reporters never really grasped.
A common reaction among super-savvy DC political types was that the NJ stuff was “too online.” Well either Mr. Beuth, a retired 72-year factory worker from Armstrong county, is super online, or many super-savvy DC political types were wrong.
A good takeaway might be that just because something plays well online doesn’t mean it’s “too online.”
Read 5 tweets
Nov 12, 2022
Indeed. By contrast, the single smartest person about Nevada - in ether party - has not tweeted since August 31.
I meant among political operatives. @RalstonReports is very smart too but don’t tell him i said that.
He is 😢 But he lives on through her.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(