It doesn’t matter which “gain of function” definition you prefer... NIH was collaborating on risky research with a Chinese lab that has zero transparency and zero accountability during a crisis — and no one in a position of power addressed that risk.
Fauci is arguing the system worked. It didn’t. Even if the lab leak theory isn’t true, what’s clear is that we need more oversight of this risky research, both in the United States and in China.
Congress and the media would be derelict not to examine the decisions by Fauci and others that led to this collaboration. But rather than respond with openness and transparency, Fauci has consistently thrown cold water on the lab leak theory.
"This is ultimately not about Fauci or Paul or even gain of function research. This is about getting to the truth of how this pandemic started so we can adjust our policies to prevent the next one."
It’s bad enough Beijing is forcing Covax to pay for China’s subpar shots. The worst part is that U.S. taxpayers are effectively financing Beijing’s scheme.
.@SenatorRisch said the Covax contract to buy subpar Chinese vaccines is "appalling" and noted "the irony that China has contributed nothing to Covax and yet now stands to profit from it, when indeed, they started this whole mess in the first place.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@washingtonpost In Oct 2019, 9,000 international athletes from more than 100 countries traveled to the Wuhan Military World Games — and many of them later got sick with covid-19-like symptoms. But there has never been a real investigation... washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Nailing down the timeline of the pandemic’s origin is a crucial task. The United States needs to do its best to figure it out, lawmakers are now saying, regardless of where the data leads.
In this @nytimes "interview" with Wuhan Institute Virology scientist Shi Zhengli, she just repeats the usual CCP propaganda while ignoring all questions about her complete lack of transparency or accountability. Zero new information. nytimes.com/2021/06/14/wor…
@nytimes There should be a section of every one of her interviews that mentions that any scientist or doctor who didn't toe the CCP party propaganda line on the COVID story in public got detained or disappeared. She has no ability to speak independently, it's sad but true.
What the CCP propaganda she regurgitates tells us is that the Chinese government is calling the Biden administration liars on several aspects of the COVID origin story, including about the sick researchers and the work they were doing. Both governments can't be telling the truth.
Biden points out that the Chinese labs have zero transparency, which is a huge problem regardless of whether COVID-19 leaked from a Wuhan lab. He also says we need to find out if it leaked from a lab.
.@SecBlinken says on @FaceTheNation the WHO must be able to move forward “with China cooperating” on a Phase 2 report looking at the coronavirus origin. That’s not serious. The WHO has already shown its impotence. If Biden punts to the WHO, that would be negligence.
.@jdickerson points out Beijing has already said it won’t cooperate with the WHO on investigating the Wuhan labs. Blinken says “China has to cooperate with that” but has zero answers for what the US would do to bring pressure. All talk, no action.
.@SecBlinken on the Nord Stream II pipeline: "The reality is the physical completion of the pipeline is pretty much a done deal." Says we don't want to alienate allies for no gain.
@HouseForeignGOP .@SecBlinken on suspected directed energy attacks on US diplomats: “We do not know what caused these incidents. We do not know who, if anyone, was responsible, state actor or otherwise.” @SenatorCollins doesn't like the "if anyone" part.
Biden took an important but limited step toward a genuine investigation into the origins of covid-19... But this is just one aspect of a growing U.S. government and congressional effort to finally try to get to the bottom of how the pandemic started. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
“We are not saying that in 90 days we will have an answer or the answer, we’re saying in 90 days we are going to have an update, and then we will see where we go from there,” a senior administration official told me.