One reason why this is a big deal? It brings HIV prevention into line with other infectious disease prevention. The federal government is taking steps to do for HIV what they have done for diseases like COVID and Tuberculosis.
I've talked about my own experience with TB before. The government poured money into my treatment in order to prevent others from being infected. They have also, clearly, invested in COVID.
There is no vaccine for HIV. And, unlike TB, which is bacterial, it can't be cured with antibiotics. But there have long been steps the Fed Gov could take to stop the spread & to mitigate the harm of infection. These include PrEP and ArT (Antiretroviral) cocktail.
It is a *big* deal for the Fed Gov't to move HIV prevention into the realm of "we need to spend more money on medicine to prevent this disease."

Even more steps need to be taken to supply people w/ both PreP and ArT.

These steps could vastly decrease HIV infections.
It's great that the Fed Gov is taking action now. But more action should be taken. We should take all known steps to eradicate HIV. This includes coverage of both PrEP and ArT. We should fund this just as aggressively as any other infectious disease prevention.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

23 Jul
First, abortion is not an infectious disease. Second, this precedent is actually not new. We've actually been rather lax about COVID restrictions compared to other infectious disease control. When I had TB, I would have gone to jail if I refused treatment or broke quarantine
Here's what I went through w/ TB: random check ups to ensure I was quarantined. Supervised medicine over the course of 7 months. Literally had pills delivered to me every day, unwrapped, counted, and popped in my mouth. I wasn't allowed to touch them unsupervised.
There is a lot of hardcore infectious disease control happening behind the scenes. People just didn't see it before COVID. It's why we don't have a big issue w/ TB anymore! You are legally mandated to be treated. Requiring a vaccine for employment is child's play compared to that
Read 6 tweets
22 Jul
I did not dismiss any such reporting. I criticized a particular kind of journalism that relies on coughing up connections that invite substance-less inferences about malfeasance. Journalism-by-insinuation is not a good way to get at the truth.
From what I've read, it seems like NSOGroup is worthy of a lot of criticism and/or examination. SKDK's decision to briefly do PR for them (ending in 2019) is also interesting. What was the PR? What did SKDK know about NSO's practices? Why did SKDK stop doing PR for them?
I'd be happy to see reporting on this. And I would not defend SKDK if they were aware of unethical business practices & engaged in PR to cover them up.

But I wasn't informed by @kenvogel's tweet about any of this. It was much more in the vein of throwing spaghetti at the wall.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul
I feel like this misunderstands the American political atmosphere. Those who are highly tuned into this process are already partisan. FOX news will succeed at convincing their audience the process is bad no matter what. Non-partisans will either ignore it or tune in irregularly
And Democrats shouldn't change their behavior based on how the GOP will spin it. It would be the political equivalent planning all your behavior to counteract the future narrative of an increasingly fascistic cheshire cat. There's no way to actually succeed on this path.
Better for Democrats to accept that the propaganda is going to exist no matter what & to counteract it when it comes. When planning their own activities, they should just do what they think is right.
Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
There is not a one-to-one mapping between economic systems & prioritizing profit over human/environmental needs. Countries with socialism, communism, or varying degrees of nationalization can also have profit motivations that lead to bad human & environmental outcomes.
The USSR was a notorious polluter & engaged in massive deforestation. Russia is currently warming at a faster pace than the rest of the planet. Part of Ukraine is still sealed off due to Chernobyl. Also unfair labor practices were widespread and human welfare was poor.
China is a massive polluter and also has unfair labor practices, including child labor. Venezuela is suffering from a lot of pollution due to oil production and, again, human welfare is poor. PEMEX, the Mexican oil company that caused the ocean fire, is state-owned.
Read 6 tweets
20 Jul
I'd be a lot less irritated by this whole "private space" thing if Bezos used some of his unfathomable fortune to alleviate some Americans' medical debt and paid his damn taxes
People make a lot of exaggerated claims about how many problems billionaires could truly solve in a sustainable way. Also, the charity model stinks & we need a stronger welfare state

That said, surely Bezos could have made some kind of generous gesture w/ this giant pile of $$
My point here is that I really wouldn't have a problem with someone funding their own space travel as long as they did nice things for other people. If Warren Buffett or George Soros wanted to employ a bunch of engineers to launch them into space, I'd be like, "Okay, that's fine"
Read 4 tweets
18 Jul
I feel like I just read a screed from a white child about how his Black dolls are so much cooler than his white friend's Black dolls
If you want to understand the dynamics of the CBC and Black candidates for Congress, maybe just try to do some factual reporting, instead of wish-casting your feelings in some kind of bizarre white-puppeteer act about Black people you like vs Black people you think are uncool.
The fact that Nina Turner is identified as Black in this tweet but Shontel Brown is not carries the implication that perhaps the CBC has some kind of lack of support for Black candidates. Which, again, sounds like white people playing puppeteer with Black people. Not your toys!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(