Anarchists (Libertarian Socialists) are perceived as a threat and attacked by all sides of the political spectrum (if you will) because what all other sides have in common (Left or Right) is an acceptance of top-down hierarchy and coercive authority (even if some try to hide it).
Anarchists understand Capitalism as not only a system of exploitation, but a system of domination as well, and they understand that domination (in some form or another) has essentially existed since human beings have been around (well before Capitalism even had a name).
Anarchists believe production must be controlled by the people themselves in service to the commons, just as most self-described Socialists/Communists do.
But they have never believed that production must first pass through the hands of some bureaucratic body for this to happen.
Pretty much all other major political tendencies (Left or Right) subscribe to paternalistic and hierarchical ideas around organizational structure or governance; they believe in “leaders,” “representatives,” “bosses,” or an “elite” of some sort, and for different purposes/causes.
Anarchists have historically called the bluffs of all claiming to lead or act “on behalf” of others, while simultaneously having to face the challenge of galvanizing people – conditioned under paternalism and hierarchies their whole lives – to lead themselves through cooperation.
At their worst, Anarchists neglect the struggle of organization, fall into forms of lifestylism, or leave themselves open/vulnerable to authoritarian appeals.
At their best, Anarchists take the concepts of “freedom” and “prefiguration” seriously, and to their fullest extents.
Freedom = “the equality of unequals” and maximization of individual liberty/autonomy under a system of governance directly and democratically determined by a collective.
Prefiguration = reflecting the values of the society you want to reach in the practice of trying to reach it.
Humans can no longer afford to give time, energy, and resources to people (and bodies of people) that don’t take the ultimate goal of freedom seriously, and/or whose means don’t reflect expressed ends in any meaningful way, shape, or form.
Everything is on the line…
Those who continue to delude themselves in their thirst for individual power and domination are laying the foundation for our collective demise (both their *and* our demise).
Only prefigurative, #DualPower efforts for freedom can afford us a chance.
Why is it so hard for some white Leftists (of every tendency) to stay in their lane?
Just because you know Black people who agree with you on some things doesn’t give you license to insert yourself into Black community dialogue.
This shouldn’t need to be stated in 2021.
We started our org in 2018 because it was just as clear then as it is now that we need our own institutions to cover our own history and make our own decisions about our own futures. Unfortunately, we don’t yet have our own public digital spaces for clear, uninterrupted dialogue.
So if you are white and claim to be a comrade, and see Black folks with similar views having a discussion about something online, and sense that there is a disagreement on matters that don’t necessarily concern you, it’s probably best for you to stay out of it.
Go down his timeline and peep who he retweets or is a fan of.
Tells you everything you need to know.
Also peep this interesting pic of him with some fash buds.
This is why “anti-authoritarianism” is a requirement, and especially if you’re Black.
If you’re Black and in support of top-down, paternalistic framing around “revolution” despite the fact that we are ethnic minorities in a white supremacist country, you are delusional.
“Nation-states” are deemed “just” under hierarchical, colonizer logic, but are antithetical to the freedom of those “below,” no matter how similar those “above” in these nation-states may look to those below.
This is why we must offer political frameworks that transcend statism.
Anyone who calls themselves a “Leftist” and implicitly presumes in their analyses that things like nation-states and borders must exist, or be further explored for us to be “free,” do not have an understanding of what freedom is, or simply wish to warp its meaning to control you.
We get free by building freedom in the cracks and crevices of the crumbling system as it stands now, not by caulking these cracks with the very substance of what defines the statist mechanisms or structures of domination closing in on us already.
This clip is a huge mess, not only because we have over a century’s worth of history illustrating how fascists court and work with certain tendencies amongst the so-called “Left,” but because almost the entire discourse in the clip below is in the scope of electoral politics too.
Red-Brownism seems to be reduced by this crowd to a nonsense idea of “left-wingers” working with “right-wingers” because they’re knowingly “right-wingers in disguise,” and their idea of “Left” includes left-Liberal forces (Social Democrats) in and around the Democratic Party too?
Point 1:
When we say “Left,” we refer to the revolutionary Left.
This “Left” is concerned primarily with labor and land, and supplanting the capitalist system with other systems.
The revolutionary “Left” is mostly made up of Anarchists, or authoritarians of various tendencies.