Too much you could say here, but let's start with this: in 2008, the US authorities arranged the overnight extradition of Colombian death-squad leaders because they were about to start talking about Alvaro Uribe's support for their campaign of mass murder. 1/ Image
The paramilitaries thought Uribe had betrayed them when a Colombian court ruled they would have to serve actual jail time for their crimes, so they were about to sing like canaries. The US legal system stuffed their mouths with gold in the form of absurdly light sentences. 2/ Image
The extradition happened literally overnight when Alvaro Uribe realized his allies were about to start talking. He had them bundled out of the country before the Colombian courts could intervene. Washington jumped to assist him without delay. 3/ Image
The US authorities made sure the paramilitaries were "handsomely rewarded", as the New York Times put it, and brushed their record of mass murder under the carpet. 4/ Image
The paramilitary leaders and their victims both felt that Uribe had one motivation: to prevent them from testifying in a Colombian court about pervasive state collaboration with far-right death squads. Washington did everything in its power to assist him. 5/ Image
One of the judges openly stated that he gave special treatment to these drug traffickers because they didn't just sell cocaine for profit: they used the cash to fund a campaign of mass murder to exterminate the Colombian left, "activity" which had some "positive perspectives". 6/ Image
One of the US prosecutors in the trials of these death-squad chiefs said that all things considered, he couldn't be sure he wouldn't also have done the same thing—in other words, ordered his underlings to slaughter innocent men, women and children with machetes and chainsaws. 7/ Image
Full details here—a brilliant piece of in-depth reporting by the NYT. Now tell us again how the US ruling class is deeply concerned about democracy and human rights in Latin America and can be trusted to do the right thing. 8/

nytimes.com/2016/09/11/wor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Finn

Daniel Finn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanFinn95

8 Jul
This article is all spot-on as far as Starmer is concerned. But the reluctance of journalists to interrogate the standard, grossly misleading narrative about how Corbyn "disastrously dealt with Jewish claims about antisemitism" helped bring us to this point.
In reality, Corbyn removed officials who were provably incompetent in handling antisemitism complaints and brought in people who dealt with them properly. His reward was to have the ex-officials lionized as "whistleblowers" by the national broadcaster.

buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/le…
There's a mountain of evidence to show what these "whistleblowers" were actually doing when they worked for Labour. But the idea that they were making heroic efforts to root out antisemitism has been given canonical status by the British media.

novaramedia.com/2020/05/19/did…
Read 6 tweets
6 Jul
This decision is obviously a disgrace, but so is the Guardian's absurd description of Phillips as an "anti-racism campaigner." This isn't journalism: it's ideological warfare against the concepts people need in order to talk about and understand politics.

theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/j…
This is what Phillips does for a living: he writes articles for the Tory press, denouncing anyone who questions a whitewash of racism in Britain by another Tory stooge (complete with ridiculous lies about "Mandingo fighting" being a widely used term).

thetimes.co.uk/article/silenc…
A much better Guardian article, which correctly notes that the far right popularized a false narrative about grooming gangs. But the far right also had respectable mainstream figures on its side, including "anti-racism campaigner" Trevor Phillips.

theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
Read 4 tweets
21 Jun
I guess we all have our threshold for cringe. Being a Lib Dem means you can stomach this kind of thing; being a socialist means you're comfortable with the word "comrade." Each to their own.

tribunemag.co.uk/2019/11/debunk…
The Lib Dems ran a deliberate wrecking campaign in the constituency where Grenfell happened, lying about Grenfell, lying about their own chances, to ensure it would have a Tory MP who could vote against implementing the Grenfell report's recommendations.

mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Sam Gyimah lied about Grenfell for the same reason Jo Swinson lied about this: their entire campaign was a deliberate kamikaze mission against the left. As their election report said: "We chose to claim to believe we could win outright ourselves."

theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
Four years to the day since Jeremy Corbyn & his allies obliged columnists such as Jonathan Freedland to write columns like this. The ferocity of the backlash that followed—and is still following—surely owes a great deal to feelings of wounded pride.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
No guff here about May being a uniquely awful campaigner (although he did squeeze in a line about the "weakest Tory campaign in at least 40 years" towards the end—a taste of the narrative to come). Corbyn "deserves credit for this astonishing performance", said Freedland. Image
Freedland also acknowledged that Labour under Corbyn won a lot of ex-UKIP votes instead of forfeiting them to the Tories—a trick that seems to be eluding Keir Starmer today. Another point that was scrubbed from the media narrative as soon as possible. Image
Read 6 tweets
4 Jun
I see Margaret Hodge is hamming it up for the cameras like the world's worst soap actress, and journalists are pretending to believe a word she says. It's like the summer of 2018 all over again, albeit without the sunny weather.

jacobinmag.com/2018/09/labour…
Frankly, anyone who believed that Hodge was sincere in any of her claims that summer should atone for their gullibility by wearing clown make-up in public for a full year. Every part of her protracted temper tantrum was planned out on a grid with her factional allies.
You can be quite certain that no British journalists actually took her ravings seriously, although they found it expedient to pretend otherwise. It was a display of cynicism and bad faith with few parallels in modern times—a stomach-churning performance.
Read 7 tweets
17 May
Latest Long Reads podcast is up now, with Paul Buhle talking about the life and work of C. L. R. James (and a few clips from James himself talking about cricket, Haiti, Marxism and more):

blubrry.com/jacobin/772553…
Great interview with James by Studs Terkel from 1970 here:

And another between James and Edward Thompson here:

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(