So, I'm learning a lot from today's #TwitterThon with @JoshuaBHoe asking the President to commute the sentences of the 4,500 people who were safely released--pre-screened--and who have been living without incident at home for over a year. A thread.
I have thought a lot about what this system does to the people in it. After all, I have worked in it--in various roles--for about 10 years. And so when I think of accused people, I don't think of "offenders," but rather of very real people I know well and care about deeply.
So the group of people who we could classify as system users--the accused--are as varied a group as any group of humans. Some have caused harm. Many haven't. Few have caused as much harm as they're accused of. And all are actively being harmed, to extreme degrees, by our system.
It's actually pretty easy to retain your humanity on the defense side (or it should be). It's just painful. People let you share their stories, trust you to fight for their lives, and you aren't always able to win for them. But on the other side--it's a different story.
DAs have to seek to put people in cages. Judges have to actually do it by setting bail & imposing sentences. And so we've built this system that relies on dehumanizing the person--the system user--so that other system actors can feel okay about inflicting harm on them.
So the system sets up a structure to preserve their ability to do harm. Using language that otherizes and dehumanizes. Creating spaces where pain is hidden (Judges and DAs only see the accused person for a minute, their pain is hidden outside and in holding cells.)
The problem is, the system would actually get much better outcomes if two-thirds of the parties weren't inoculated against their feelings. They'd be able to better consider the full array of challenges--and potential--in the accused person and craft better offers and outcomes.
This really bears out in practice--when we at @PFJ_USA bring the full scope of a person's story into the courtroom, usually we (1) get jail off the table and get people home and (2) get great feedback from judges and DAs who are happy to have had better, more human information.
But back to today. Today I'm sitting here in upside-down world, where my mentions are overtaken by people with handles like God Blessed 1776 who spit slogans like "do the crime do the time" and urge our government to re-incarcerate people like Gwen Levi. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
I can't reply to all these posts, but I wish I could. I know that if these people's daughter or brother or grandparent was in danger of incarceration, they'd pull out all the stops to protect them, inherently recognizing that everyone is more than their worst moment.
The perspective is infused with the racist dehumanization we pack into every aspect of the legal system and its language, but it's popping up here in people who may have had zero contact with this system in their entire lives. People utterly unaware of its realities.
People didn't do this to themselves (entirely). We did it as a culture--yes, the failures of our educational system, yes the toxicity of our politics, yes, the suppression of elected officials who want to somehow protect our legacy of oppression.
But today made me reflect on how in media, language is more important than ever. The same terms that let judges sentence a person to 30 years--and then do it again the next day--are the terms that let people say a grandma like Gwen should be back in prison to "do the time."
You see it all the time, all around us. "Convicts" are being released. "Offenders" have to be managed. "Facilities" are ready to "house" them. It sanitizes what's really happening and lets God Blessed 1776 continue believing that the people in the prison are nothing like them.
This is not a small number of people who are convinced that (1) our system is fair and (2) that they can hold such cavalierly violent opinions about their neighbors. They don't see the utterly racist application of our legal infrastructure. They just see "convicts."
I'm begging you to share with your local media outlet. Feel free to tag them in the comments. Push them. Your local paper, your local news, your favorite major outlet. Let's demand better so that everyone has to feel the full weight of what we've built. themarshallproject.org/records/2651-l…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Galvin-Almanza

Emily Galvin-Almanza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GalvinAlmanza

24 Jul
Good morning everyone. I'm joining @JoshuaBHoe to stage a 24 hour effort calling on @POTUS to #KeepThemHome. You may not know this, but several thousand people were screened to be sent home from prison to weather the pandemic. forbes.com/sites/walterpa…
Now, @POTUS is signaling that they will be sent back--many for years. These are folks who were screened for safety, released, and have had a 99.9% success rate. They have jobs, families, lives. There is zero safety reason to return them to prison. forbes.com/sites/walterpa…
If this seems unfair to you. If this bothers you.If you want to end mass incarceration. If you want kids to be with their parents. If you want families intact. If you want more potential workers in a community. Join us in asking to #KeepThemHome.
Read 28 tweets
19 Jul
This is an important perspective on the Westfall Act. But it's also much more than that, in the way @tribelaw speaks on the relationship between access to justice and the health of a democracy (indulge me in a super short thread where I relate this back to public defense)
The law is only the law in that it is *perceived* as the law. The way people *experience* our legal structures is, in fact, the way they exist in the real world--and the way most people experience the law is as byzantine, protective of the powerful, oppressive to the powerless.
The subject matter here is the limit of "official duty" and of course we know that Trump stretched that notion harder than he stretches his golf pants, and this resulted in the widespread perception that the law is nothing more than tool of the ruling class.
Read 10 tweets
25 May
This is a BIG DEAL and will need a *lot* of public support to pass. If you care about ending police violence, you should care about this bill. Here's why.

(a thread)

delawareonline.com/story/news/pol…
Delaware, unlike basically every other state, has a weird law in place that actually *shields records of police misconduct* from public view.

You read that right: not *any* police records, records of actual wrongdoing.

They're secret.

The "bad apples" get protection.
The legal shielding afforded to bad cops in DE plays out as repeated instances of violence, and the thing we all fear about violent cops: the ability to hop around from town to town, leaving a wake of state violence against Black & Brown people.

Take Thomas Webster, for example
Read 10 tweets
23 May
I don't come from a journalism background. I was a public defender, and still consider myself to be one, honestly. In the law, a profession where ability to represent *any* position is *essential,* we still generally recognize that humans are humans with their own perspectives.
When I started doing journalistic work with, working for The Appeal and hosting Appeal Live, it was incredibly strange to me to encounter media norms, in which one is expected to take on a pretense of inhuman, unrealistic neutrality.
This case isn't even a close one--things you said or did long before you had a job, generally, aren't the kind of *on the job* things that can get you fired...unless you're into pretending that journalists aren't humans with human perspectives.

Which is dumb, and unrealistic.
Read 4 tweets
28 Apr
I mean, do you know how many people I've defended for failing to pay (or being unable to pay) for a bus ticket??? It's SO COMMON and such a stupid reason to arrest someone.
When you consider that every arrest puts lives at risk--especially for BIPOC who are most likely to be arrested for failure to pay AND most likely to be harmed during arrest--transit fares are like this weird, secret little fast track to police violence.
Read 9 tweets
25 Apr
Just read that a % of people are skipping 2nd vaccine bc they fear side effects. Reading Twitter one would think everyone gets side effects. So for a little balance, hubs & I have ~zero effects from 2nd Pfizer. He's a little tired. I scrubbed the tub and made muffins today.
Since people are asking, thr muffins are grated pear & fresh ginger with cardamom and pine nuts.
And here's what I was reading

Millions Are Skipping Their Second Doses of Covid Vaccines nyti.ms/3gDYym2
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(