1/ Recently heard advertisement for a device that removes 99+% of virus that causes COVID-19 from treated air. To many this might sound like the device removes 99% of viruses in room or building air. This is highly unlikely in a real-world setting.
2/ It is not clear how the company arrived at 99+% removal of SARS-CoV-2 virus and whether this means inactivation of the virus or removal of aerosol particles that convey the virus.
3/ It is not clear whether this figure was derived from a very small chamber with low ventilation that the device was placed in, whether "treated air" means air that flows through the device, or something else.
4/ If "treated air" means air flowing through the device, then 0.99 is the single-pass fractional removal efficiency through device. Sounds great, but efficiency is not equal to effectiveness, as the flow rate through the device is also critical.
5/ The clean air delivery rate (CADR) = A x B, where A = single-pass fractional removal efficiency and B is volumetric flow rate through the device, e.g., cubic feet per minute (cfm). Even if A = 0.99, if B is very small CADR will be very small.
6/ So, now let's assume a reasonably well-mixed 700 sq ft. classroom w/ 9 ft ceilings (volume = 6,300 cubic feet) at steady-state. The classroom is under-ventilated at 2/hr and particle removal to surfaces is negligible (assumptions that magnify benefits of the air cleaner).
7/ For these conditions an airflow rate (B above) of 215 cfm will lead to 50% reduction in aerosol particles in classroom air, 635 cfm (a very high flow rate for portable air cleaners) for 75% reduction, and ... drum roll ....
8/ 23,000 cfm for 99% removal (assuming A = 0.99 in every case). That's a massive fan and intense mixing of room air! So, I do not think that the 99+% removal was intended to mean effectiveness of particle reduction in an actual room similar to a classroom.
9/ Upshot - Do some digging and find out what is actually meant when you hear claims related to air cleaning and try to place in the context of the environment that you are interested in.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"fine aerosols constituted 85% of the viral load detected in our study." "Exposure to fine aerosols should be mitigated, especially in indoor environments."
Still in peer review, but preliminary results confirm what many of us have said for 15 mos. 1/
Reduction of inhalation dose of aerosol particles is critical to win this deadly war, particularly amongst the unvaccinated. Mitigate by wearing masks, increasing ventilation (including more activities outdoors), improved central filtration, portable HEPA filtration. 2/
Remember that only about 13% of the world's population is fully vaccinated, the Delta variant is a beast, and 3/
In academia we talk a lot about, and celebrate, the successes of students and faculty, and we should. IMO we do not talk enough about or celebrate the tremendous contributions of staff, the gears that keep the academic machine running hour to hour. 1/
They advise prospective students, help guide & encourage current students, support advancement of diversity, equity and inclusion, help faculty and students with a wide range of teaching and research activities, maintain and upgrade IT, clean and ... 2/
fix infrastructure, balance books, clean and fix infrastructure, and so much more. 3/
1/ Recently met a couple who are not vaccinated and who do not mask. It was outdoors, yet I wore a mask and distanced. When I tried to present a series of facts about the importance of vaccinations their response was consistently "our friends tell us differently."
2/ These are not folks who fit the stereotypical anti-vaxxers as seen on social media or television. Their beliefs come from friends who attend their church. They were polite and from our conversation I found out also highly educated.
3/ I failed at convincing them that they should become vaccinated. I am not a social scientist or, perhaps most importantly, one of their friends at church. This exercise reinforced my belief that academics on social media will have little impact on increasing vaccination rates.
1/ Been reading the fascinating Dr. Fauci emails released by @washingtonpost. I am so disappointed that Americans are running to their ideological corners on these. No, he did NOT "lie about everything." No, he did not get everything right.
2/ What jumps out to me is the tragedy that experts across disciplines were not pulled together early. Dr. Fauci is a bright & qualified scientist in his lane of expertise, but emails show he did not understand aerosol science or transport of viruses in aerosol particles.
3/ This is particularly true when discussing the value of masks. Imagine had he teamed with one or more exceptional aerosol scientists, and particularly @linseymarr who is a foremost expert on transport of viruses in aerosol particles. Messaging might have been different.
Portland State University will be open this fall, but with a significant layered risk reduction protocol on campus. 1/
Required vaccinations (w/ some exceptions), required masks inside buildings, increased % outdoor air in supply air, MERV-13 filtration, & an army of very good & appropriately-sized portable HEPA filtration systems in classrooms. 2/
We will have in-person courses and some of these will be taught w/ simultaneous live streaming for those who are unable to come to campus. We will also have on-line course offerings. 3/