This column by @davidfrum gets at something I sense, too. He asks, "Will Blue America ever decide it’s had enough of being put medically at risk by people and places whose bills it pays?" Then concludes rhetorically: "Check yourself: Have you?"
Still, theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Then what? Yes, this is different, somehow, different even than realizing a large minority of the country voted for Trump--twice. This is a far more personal and physical assault. People are sick of the pandemic. Sick of fearing for the people they love. Sick of lockdowns.
Sick of cripplied economies. Sick of the burden on the healthcare system and above all the healthcare workers. And everyone understands that the obstacle to returning to normalcy is the anti-vaxxers--a danger to themselves, their families, their communities, and their countries.
But what are we prepared to do? Secede? I think levels of rage about this are higher than I've ever seen them before in the US. This is one stunt too many. People feel--because it's true--that their lives and their parents' lives and their kids' lives are being endangered.
No longer so much by the virus, because we've beaten it: We know end the pandemic, and we have the tools to do it. But by the imbeciles, who won't let us end the pandemic. And no one feels, anymore, no matter what they say, that we're all one America.
When other Americans don't care if they kill you, or your family, or tank the economy--they've broken the social compact. It's impossible to feel a warm sense of shared citizenship with people who don't care if they kill the people you love.
But what next? We can't break up. We're stuck together. And we can't reconcile. This has been a bridge too far. We're trapped together. The anti-vaxxers say we don't respect them. It's true. We don't. We don't like them, either.
Are we still meaningfully a country? It's kind of hard to see what we have in common anymore. But nothing would be solved by secession. So we have to figure out a way to make it work.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. There is no "unexplained adverse event signal in VAERS." I'll return to this in the next thread.
2. IVM does not "address escape variants." There is scant evidence it does anything at all, no less address these variants. What's more, the reasoning is backward:
Even if it were effective, it's therapeutics, *not* vaccines, that should cause us to worry about escape variants. See: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… The way to avoid those variants is to get as many people vaccinated, with both doses, as possible. As fast as possible.
It's especially important to prevent the spread of the disease to the immunoincompetent, which for obvious reasons requires *the whole community* be vaccinated.
3. There have been *no* reports of ADE from the vaccines. They've looked for it in animal studies: None.
@FDACBER, Peter Marks is dead wrong and @EricTopol is entirely right. nytimes.com/2021/07/09/opi… Public trust in FDA being damaged *by the delay,* which is *assuredly* contributing to vaccine hesitancy and thus to needless suffering and death.
In your opinion piece, you say, "get vaccinated right now." Yet by foot-dragging, your own agency is doing more to undermine this message than any other part of our government. @SenatorBaldwin, can you get on the phone with @DrWoodcockFDA and say, "This is unacceptable?"
I wandered lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden imbeciles;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the milky way,
They stretched in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.
The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed—and gazed—but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:
Covid19 in Tunisia, where there is a severe shortage of oxygen. This is the director of the public hospital. Part of me says I shouldn't retweet images of a stranger's agony. Another part says, "Maybe seeing this will move people to help."
Tunisia’s health system has collapsed. Bodies of the victims have been left for as long as 24 hours because there aren't enough staff to transfer them to mortuaries--and no room at the mortuaries, either. They set up field hospitals, but they've overflowed.
For all of my new followers, and Twitter tells me that for some reason a whole bunch of people (like, a thousand) started following me last week, let me introduce this series and the @cosmo_globalist generally. Stick with me on this thread, okay?
We publish in English, for now, but plan to expand to other languages. We treat *global* events from a genuinely global perspective; our correspondents come from around the world, and we mean for every article we publish to be of relevance and interest to you, wherever you live.
This is very comprehensive, yes. It's excellent. But the simplest argument, I think, and the one that I hope might persuade people who won't read anything longer than a tweet, is this one:
Assume, for the sake of argument, that the spike protein is a poison.
You have two choices.
Would you like a finite dose of poison?
Or would you like your poison attached to a virus?
Proteins don't replicate. *Viruses do.* Viruses take your cells hostage and turn them into virus-making factories. Each new virus comes with ... a spike protein.
So which is the better bet? Spike proteins in a dose so limited that your immune system can quickly despatch it to hell? Or spike proteins travelling on a virus that replicates, meaning within days there are more of these proteins than there are grains of sand on the earth?