Banning cryptocurrencies is a foolish idea; all we need to do is regulate the exchanges.
If people insist their play money is real, then make them do time in the real-world pokey for breaking any of the rules that govern doing stuff with money. It's a similar strategy to making your kid pay rent and utilities if they insist they be treated like an adult.
Banning cryptocurrency would only reinforce the cult's belief system. We should take advantage of the fact that the technology is completely unworkable, and let it die a natural death. Regulating the exchanges will protect civilians while the fanatics get their wiggles out.
Meme stocks like GME are a great example of where we should take cryptocurrency. Make them strongly regulated, legal gambling tokens where the SEC will come tow away your Lambo if you attempt to do shady shit on the public markets.
The place where someone accepts play money and puts spendable money in your hand, or accepts real money from you and tries to move it, is the correct locus for cryptocurrency regulation and enforcement.
The Cuban Convertible Peso is also a stablecoin, but one reason it hasn't taken over the economy is because it's very annoying to try to trade it for the thing it's pegged to. Let us all study and learn from the Cuban Convertible Peso.
You can turn a wallet full of cash into a bank balance, but trying to do that with a suitcase or boxcar full of USD brings many new and very inquisitive people into your life. Do the same for crypto.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pinboard

Pinboard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Pinboard

23 Jul
Klobuchar's bill would make online companies liable for users who post misinformation about public health, in a year when public health authorities have done multiple U-turns on what is true. It would be a windfall for lawyers and serve no public interest. wsj.com/articles/bill-…
The bill would give the Department of Health and Human Services de facto censorship authority over social media, exposing anyone who defied HHS guidelines to predatory lawsuits. If such a law were proposed abroad, we'd correctly identify it as an attack on freedom of speech.
All you have to do is remember back to summer 2020, when systemic racism was asserted to be a public health problem commesurate with covid, to recognize how quickly such a mandate would expand in all political directions, changing with each election. This is how censorship works.
Read 4 tweets
18 Jul
The spyware scandal in the news today is a chance to reiterate that human beings are incapable of producing defect-free software at any scale. In particular, there is no such thing as a secure online system or a secure mobile platform. This foundational issue won't go away.
Our main line of defense against malicious software is that human ingenuity is also limited, so we only find a fraction of our errors. And the malefactors go on to make more mistakes coding the malware. Incompetence is the great defensive wall securing most of our infrastructure.
The phone situation in particular is dire, and I hope we see a future where these all-in-one devices are supplemented by simpler machines that do just one thing (make phone calls, send text messages) and can't be turned into a 24/7 surveillance beacon by hacking an emoji renderer
Read 10 tweets
18 Jul
The law he is presumably referring to is Section 230, which keeps owners of online forums from being liable for what participants post. This law allows small websites like mine to exist. Without it, we would only have the tech giants, who can afford massive legal departments.
If you or someone you love has been hurt in an online argument, and you want to bring the fun and excitement of US personal injury law to the world wide web, then Section 230 repeal is for you! You may be entitled to a cash settlement; call the number on the nearest billboard.
This view that misinformation is inflicted on an unwilling and innocent public is starting to grind my gears. The demand is driven by people hungry for more and more of it. Mark Zuckerberg is not responsible for the human condition, and linear algebra didn't radicalize your aunt
Read 5 tweets
17 Jul
I watched the first episode of a 2016 Chinese police procedural called "Medical Examiner Dr. Qin" last night, and I can't recommend it highly enough. Spoilers ahead, but as you'll see it doesn't really matter.
The show starts with police finding a deep-fried human hand in a vat of illegal cooking oil. An unscrupulous vendor skimmed it from a sewer, where a criminal had just happened to dump the deep-fried remains of his two victims.
Having found deep-fried human remains of a human hand at a food market, the police decide they have 48 hours to solve the crime before the public becomes upset. For the rest of the show there is a digital counter, letting us know how the men and women in blue are doing.
Read 13 tweets
17 Jul
Good example of the catastrophizing mode that is the official line on climate change. Another truth is:

1. Some places will become unlivable
2. Some new places will become very comfy
3. There's a lot of money to be made moving wealthy people from A to B

nytimes.com/2021/07/17/cli…
I understand that "DOOM! DOOM!" is an engaging headline, but we should talk some more about how to live in the coming world as a practical matter, and how to create economic incentives to help the people most affected.
Much more climate change than we're already seeing is locked in. If emissions went to zero tomorrow, we'd still see hotter summers for years. I understand the political goal of making every headline sound like we're about to die, but it's cynical and I believe counterproductive.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul
The deadline the Senate is racing to meet is that they're sending themselves on another vacation. Can senators get the legislation written in time to go off and do fuck-all in August? A nation holds its breath.
Politico calls trying to get something done before going on a month's vacation a hardball tactic. The Senate is also on vacation right now, making it harder to meet this deadline. I'm not making any of this up.
I understand the difficulty of moving bills through an obstructionist Senate, but I don't understand why Democrats don't make everyone stay and do their job for as long as it takes to produce legislation. The utter lack of urgency is infuriating.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(